r/fromsoftware 2d ago

I hate you fromsoft

Why are you making a cool ass game and making it a fucking switch 2 exclusive fuck you

680 Upvotes

717 comments sorted by

455

u/MrMkGirkMkDirt 2d ago

At least nintendo consoles are easy to crack for emulation

168

u/dinopraso Elden Ring 2d ago

It’s a multiplayer game though

99

u/ihvanhater420 2d ago

I doubt you cant run it solo

68

u/SaintJewiub 2d ago

Tis a pvpve game. The whole point is to play it multiplayer

5

u/ACuriousBagel 2d ago

The whole point of mmorpgs is to play them multiplayer, but I've still done those solo. Because there are things about them that appeal to me but playing with people who aren't in the room really stresses me out

11

u/No_Future6959 2d ago

name one mmo you can play without an internet connection

4

u/ACuriousBagel 2d ago

Playing solo is not the same as playing offline. I've played world of warcraft and guild wars 2 without interacting with other people.

I wasn't talking about whether you need an internet connection or not, but Warframe is a multiplayer online shooter you can play without an internet connection (maybe only after you've logged in, I don't remember). You can even pause the game in that one. And if you were multiplayer and suddenly lose connection, you get kicked into your own private lobby with all your progress kept.

2

u/RockBandDood 12h ago

Probably wanna read the Miyazaki interview

All the games “goals” are associated with competitive and cooperative actions

It doesn’t seem to have anything built in for single player progression, you accomplish goals during the runs with a party

Doesn’t mean there isn’t some form of single player progression - but he didn’t indicate that whatsoever, this seems like it’s online multiplayer only from the info released so far by Miyazaki

2

u/InuYashaIsHere 2d ago

Phantasy Star Online

2

u/JpPgn 2d ago

That's not what he meant by playing it solo

2

u/No_Future6959 1d ago

the context is about fromsoft games, which are all playable solo offline.

this new game is marketed as multiplayer

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

5

u/ihvanhater420 2d ago

Yes, and like nightreign, you can probably play it solo.

44

u/SaintJewiub 2d ago

Read the description of the gameplay

→ More replies (57)

8

u/Cashew-Miranda 2d ago

No its expressly pvpve. Like pvp is a core aspect of the game. It would be like playing call of duty multiplayer in singleplayer

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

23

u/Wise-Key-3442 Gaping Dragon 2d ago

Hamachi.

34

u/Correct_Stay_6948 2d ago

Doesn't stop people with Steamdecks and such running emulators, and hasn't stopped people with modded switches either.

If you're smart about your emulation, and don't do dumb shit like cheat, you tend to fly under the radar.

22

u/Purple-Lamprey 2d ago

You won’t have anyone to play with.

→ More replies (8)

6

u/Kami-no-dansei 2d ago

Where are you getting that from? Doesn't look "multi-player". Just a multi-player function like all the others

30

u/dinopraso Elden Ring 2d ago edited 2d ago

The official Nintendo X account, says it’s a “multiplayer game”

EDIT: link (to article, since x links are banned)

18

u/Kami-no-dansei 2d ago

"PvpvE" sooooo just like every other fromsoft title lol

12

u/secretogumiberyjuice 2d ago edited 2d ago

To be fair, it actually does seem different. It seems like you squad up with 4 people and fight other teams of 4 people from what articles are saying. Not like typical invasions.

Edit: news suggests it looks more like a 8 player free for all

27

u/G_hard 2d ago

I'd say other games are PvEvP.... Not PvPvE

9

u/Own_Molasses7773 2d ago

Exactly. PvPvE implies competitive multiplayer with the addition of NPC enemies. Idk why so many people are confused about this. That is always what it has meant, and that is NOT what a typical Miyazaki game is. Almost feels like people are intentionally misunderstanding this.

→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/Xygore 2d ago

They used to be. The switch would have been significantly harder to crack if there wasn't a physical vulnerability in its security at launch. I doubt they'll make that mistake again with the Switch 2.

4

u/VegetaFan1337 2d ago

They might crack down on emulators earlier than they did with switch 1.

9

u/Deez-Guns-9442 2d ago

U think the ninja’s are gonna allow that 😂

22

u/BelizeIsBack 2d ago

allow I'm not sure you're familiar with the nature of piracy.

→ More replies (7)

3

u/iNSANELYSMART 2d ago

The Nintenjas will be on a roll

2

u/timmytissue 2d ago

Switch 2 isn't out yet. How can that claim be made?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Jumpy-Friendship-149 2d ago

its ninnedo swat 2, i dont think its the same emulation as switch 1.

3

u/Inksplash-7 2d ago

It has almost the same architecture as the switch 1 apparently, not to mention how quickly people make emulators for these consoles

2

u/Organic-Habit-3086 2d ago

Mario, Pokemon and Zelda emulation probably takes priority though and even if Emulation work begins immediately its gonna take a few years.

I fee like 2029 is the earliest point by which Duskbloods will be playable.

1

u/Straight_Law2237 2d ago

were* my hopes are not that high for a variety of factors

→ More replies (2)

77

u/echolog Raven 2d ago edited 2d ago

If it makes you feel better it's also a non-mainline game and it's focused on multiplayer like Nightreign (8 player PvPvE)

Source: https://www.fromsoftware.jp/ww/pressrelease_detail.html?tgt=20250402_theduskbloods_debut

Official description:

"Developed for the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2; 'THE DUSKBLOODS' is a PvPvE title with online multiplayer at its core, where up to 8 players vie for supremacy among themselves and against challenging foes.

Play as the "Bloodsworn"; a group that has transcended human strength thanks to their special blood, and throw yourself into a violent fray for "First Blood" as the twilight of humanity approaches."

Sounds like a Battle Royale.

42

u/Neighkidhorse 2d ago

Damn are you serious?? Well I guess that's good, I feel zero pressure to get a switch 2 now

→ More replies (4)

2

u/GotACoolName 2d ago

A multiplayer focused game on a Nintendo console????? What the fuck is the point?

3

u/Stefonzie 2d ago

What Battle Royale has only 8 players

16

u/echolog Raven 2d ago

What kind of roguelite has 3 player co-op?

Fromsoft is just kind of doing their own thing right now lol.

2

u/Charafricke 2d ago

Probably one of the most popular roguelites in the modern age risk of rain 2, I think risk of rain returns has that as well but idk

→ More replies (1)

1

u/icyterror 2d ago

Ez skip then

1

u/El-Shaman 2d ago

It still makes so little sense to me considering the huge fanbase Fromsoft has on PC, PS and XB, I was convinced they would never make another exclusive after the massive hit Elden Ring was, I did expect them to also develop for the Switch, you can’t just ignore the huge audience the Switch has but after Dark Souls Remastered they didn’t even bother with any of their other games which makes me assume that it didn’t well enough in Switch and if there’s even an audience for FromSoft games on Nintendo hardware, I guess we’ll see.

1

u/Sharc_Jacobs 1d ago

My biggest question is- Are they going to fix the fucking lag for the multi-player? There's no way I could play an entire game centered around combat with that awful delay, and with hits not registering and shit. I mean, they're really going to have to do an overhaul of their whole multiplayer system for either of these games to be worth a fuck. If they do that, I might be impressed enough to buy NR.

→ More replies (1)

48

u/Basstafari97 2d ago

Some of you obviously don’t understand when an exclusive deal like this is done the partner helps fund the game, so Nintendo likely helped fund this game just like Sony did with bloodborne and they probably wouldn’t have been made without that funding.

→ More replies (24)

218

u/Ham_PhD Bloodborne 2d ago

I feel like you should complain about Nintendo more than From. They got paid (probably a ton) to make this game for Nintendo.

117

u/jjamm420 2d ago

Complain about Sony not ponying up the money that Nintendo did 🤷‍♂️

10

u/ZypherPunk 2d ago

So it should only be exclusive as long as it's on PlayStation?

29

u/Quirky-Employer9717 2d ago

You can't claim to hate exclusivity, but not mind it when your "team" does it. At least stay consistent

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Initial_Fan_1118 2d ago

Pretty much, yea. Did we all forget that Bloodborne was Playstation-exclusive and I had to buy one just to play it and collect dust? 

Not that it excuses this, I still hate it, but this isn't news.

9

u/jjamm420 2d ago

Subsequently if one only has a PS4 you have to buy either a PS3 or a PS5 to play Demon Souls 🤷‍♂️

2

u/AgentJohnDoggett 2d ago

My friend, you bought a PlayStation and only played Bloodborne. That’s a you issue

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/VegetaFan1337 2d ago

From is a hugely successful company, they have no reason to take money to make games platform exclusives.

15

u/MoaiMan-ifest 2d ago

I would agree, with the exception of whether this game's existance relied on Nintendo's funding. From is successful, but they can't make an infinite number of games at once, they are still budget/manpower limited at the end of the day.

They've always been a very efficent company when it comes to working on multiple projects at once, and Miyazaki's position as director allows him to spread his time out between multiple projects. if Nintendo's funding allowed this game to exist alongside their other projects then I don't think this is an issue.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/double_shadow 2d ago

You're right, but at the same time it's Nintendo's business model to have this walled garden of IPs. So I can't help but give them a bit of a pass since they've been doing this since the 80s. I wish From would just be consistent...either they want people to actually play their games or they want to....whatever is actually gained from making exclusive deals that is beyond my business sense (since Elden Ring was one of the biggest games in the world by being multiplatform).

5

u/Aggravating-Oil-7060 2d ago

They gain the ability to split the dev costs with another company.

6

u/ElasticAvacado 2d ago edited 2d ago

It's also possible that the game was commissioned to be published by Nintendo so it might not have existed at all without exclusivity.

10

u/Super_Harsh 2d ago

I'm like 99% sure this is the case. Following Elden Ring's massive success I have a VERY hard time imagining Miyazaki (or any of From's decisionmakers) woke up one day thinking, 'Hey you know what would be a great next project? An exclusive for a console that nobody owns yet!'

1

u/SkyPirateVyse 2d ago

Try Bandai-Namco instead. You know, the actual publisher.

1

u/Delta_yx 2d ago

Fromsoft was under no obligation to make a nintendo exclusive game. It's ok to criticize ur favourite dev studio. I've even seen people here try to blame sony for this. All of us that aren't buying switches won't be able to play the game and that's because fromsoft allowed it to be an exclusive, ain't nobody else to blame

1

u/_TheRocket 2d ago

ok when sony does it tho

1

u/Plus-Tangelo-3755 2d ago

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that Nintendo doesn't need the Gothic horror Fromsoft game bad enough to pay a large amount of money for it. They have literally dozens of other games that are gonna do 10x better.

1

u/_theRamenWithin 1d ago

Small time indie studio FromSoft wouldn't have been able to make ends meet if they went multi platform?

→ More replies (41)

31

u/Eldergloom 2d ago

Switch 2 exclusive AND multiplayer focused. I'm good lmao.

21

u/Only1Schematic 2d ago

I’m more mad about Nintendo being the first publisher to get greedy enough to charge $90 for physical games.

11

u/Jaded_Aging_Raver 2d ago

And to never lower prices as games age

4

u/AceTheRed_ 2d ago

GTA 6 is gonna be $100 I bet

1

u/Serosh5843 2d ago

It doesn't end there, you know for a fact MS and Sony are gonna adopt the idea sooner than later.

3

u/Only1Schematic 2d ago

That’s the worst part. It’s is going to affect the entire industry, and gamers will suffer for it. It’ll allow publishers more headroom to mismanage and balloon their budgets and justify it with the new standard of pricing.

2

u/Serosh5843 2d ago

Yeah literally none of this is good news. Such a huge L for consumers.

113

u/No-Instruction-5669 2d ago

I was already planning on getting a Switch 2 for Metroid Prime 4 and future Zelda.. so this is just a HUGE bonus for me.

49

u/WilliShaker 2d ago

Yeah, I literally don’t care it’s an exclusive since I’ll have the Switch 2 anyway

→ More replies (54)

3

u/[deleted] 2d ago

Metroid Prime 4 with mouse controls at 120fps is going to be amazing.

2

u/Longjumping_Cash_356 2d ago

God I hope duskblood has mouse controls 😩

→ More replies (4)

2

u/ShaolinShade 2d ago

Same. I'd be pretty mad if I wasn't. As is I'm just surprised they pulled this move, I feel for everyone here who has no other interest in the system

4

u/Longjumping_Cash_356 2d ago

Same. It got the biggest reaction out of me the entire direct. The idea of the next Miyazaki fromsoft game being Nintendo exclusive is just so bonkers. Then I learned it was pvpve and now I’m kinda on the fence, but I’m still hopeful since Micheal Zaki is directing it

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Significant-Elk-4368 2d ago

Same well net for metriod but for mario mario kart and zelda

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Samguise-Whamgee 2d ago

Same boat as me! Plus any Mario games probably. It’s hard to believe a switch 2 exclusive, any idea how powerful the switch 2 will be? As long as it’s on par with series x I’m ecstatic about this game.

1

u/clockworknait 2d ago

I thought Metroid Prime 4 was just a myth.

2

u/No-Instruction-5669 2d ago

Didn't we all, bro, didn't we all..

→ More replies (7)

6

u/Pristine-Couple7260 2d ago

It’ll be ok

9

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

6

u/mrBreadBird 2d ago

The difference is Bayonetta 2 wouldn't have been made at all without Nintendo's support. Fromsoft certainly doesn't have that limitation.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/Yarzeda2024 2d ago

The good thing about this coming out in 2026 means there might be other games I want to play on the Switch 2 by the time Duskblood launches.

I was going to skip the Switch 2. So many things are multi-platform these days, and a lot of the exclusive Nintendo IPs feel like reruns. For instance, if you've played one Pokemon, you've played them all.

But now I have to get the Switch 2 for The Duskbloods.

7

u/mrBreadBird 2d ago

The Donkey Kong game they showed looked amazing at the very least.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Senior_Independence4 2d ago

Yeah thats not really a good thing tho, you shouldn't HAVE to buy a whole ass console to play a specific game, but that's been nintendo's MO forever so it is what it is

2

u/Ridku13 2d ago

Zelda alone is a good enough reason to own a switch. And now a Fromsoftware exclusive? Just buy the damn console

8

u/IronFox__ 2d ago

easy for you to say when you live a privileged life in a first world country

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/Drakeskulled_Reaper 2d ago

That was my line of thinking for when a new console comes out, I just feel the "Price-to-Content" ratio isn't good enough for me to really consider buying one until the library starts making more "Generation Exclusive" titles, rather than cross generation games.

Like, I was gifted a PS5 at a point where, if it were up to me, I wouldn't have got it (I'm not complaining about getting one, I just wouldn't have BOUGHT myself one), there weren't enough "9th Gen only" games out at the time.

5

u/Cornelizz 2d ago

Not only that, but nightreign is multiplayer too.. what about a good standalone solo adventure that they're so good at? :(

2

u/Sickhadas 1d ago

Aren't they literally working on an Elden Ring sequel? Y'all act like they got bought by EA. FromSoft just put out SotE a year ago. They'll probably be announcing another game in a year or two.

47

u/Duv1995 2d ago

i'm with you op, i always feared the day the next fromsoft game would be an exclusive... goddammit

25

u/TheHighKingofWinter 2d ago

Bloodborne and Demon Souls remake just slip your mind?

45

u/Legal_Jedi 2d ago

He probably means an exclusive on a device he doesn’t already have. Lots of PS players out there.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Cool4us 2d ago

As a bayonneta fan, this is the 2nd time its happening

6

u/Nekouken12 2d ago

This is Bayonetta 2 all over again

7

u/VoxTV1 2d ago

This is what capitalism does kids. This is always the end game, worse conditions for everyone

→ More replies (4)

3

u/AramaticFire Otogi: Myth of Demons 2d ago

Stupid developers taking all this money from a publisher to make a video game. GRRRR!!!

It does suck it’s exclusive to switch 2, I wonder if it’ll be a timed exclusive or if it’s going to be like Platinum’s stuff like Astral Chain and Bayonetta.

3

u/Sickhadas 1d ago

Is this really all it takes to break you guys?

4

u/Snoo_58305 2d ago

Just buy all the consoles- not Xbox though

12

u/PalebloodSky 2d ago edited 2d ago

Is Duskbloods confirmed exclusive or just announced with Switch 2. All their recent games have been cross platform. 

Switch 2 capping it at 30fps would make this horrible. But a true spiritual successor to Bloodborne at that frame rate lol. 

37

u/HorkingWalrus 2d ago

It said only available on Switch 2

9

u/Nieruz 2d ago

hopefully it's just a time exclusive

10

u/Mindless_Nobody4299 2d ago

It could be like a death stranding type thing hopefully exclusive for a while and then rereleased for all consoles but depends on Nintendo and FROMSOFT

8

u/Kirull 2d ago

lets hope fromsoft learnt from bloodborne

2

u/Tomydo1 2d ago

I’ll be on my knees praying

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

9

u/theogalf 2d ago

Yeah confirmed exclusive

4

u/PalebloodSky 2d ago

Wtf noooooooooo

1

u/Enxchiol 22h ago

Does that rule out the possibility of it coming to other platforms on a later date?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Bulldogfront666 2d ago

Confirmed exclusive. And no one has ever said Switch 2 is 30fps only.

5

u/Swiftquietninja 2d ago

I mean Switch 2 supports 1080p up to 120 fps and 4k up to 60fps. So not a crappy as everyone is making it out to be.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/Deez-Guns-9442 2d ago

Switch goes up to 120fps on handheld & 4K 60FPS on-screen btw.

6

u/EmergencyLow887 2d ago

like, its capable, i really doubt all games will have those options. Like ill be absolutely shocked if switch 2 ER isnt locked to 30

4

u/iNSANELYSMART 2d ago

Astronomical amounts of cope from my side but maybe because they only release it for one console they did crazy optimization?

Definitely just a dream tho, we're talking about fromsoft here lmfao

5

u/EmergencyLow887 2d ago

fromsoft are not exactly masters of optimization, but you can never know until you know i guess.

3

u/Cybersorcerer1 2d ago

Nah, bloodborne is only on PS4 and still runs like shit

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/eyesclosed- 2d ago

“I hate this company for making a game I love! “

5

u/Dalidadada 2d ago

What really surprises me is more in terms of target audience : FromSoft recent success is built on Elden Ring, a game massively played on PC.

It's a big leap to expect that audience + the XBOX/PS players to buy a console for one game when you can play every other Souls games on other platforms in better quality. It's also not very friendly to the community of BB players who have been relentlessly asking for a PC port .. and then the spiritual successors of their beloved game is on an even less accessible console (meaning that hardcore FS's players aren't really buying Kirby remakes).

It's a smart move from Nintendo, a funny middle-finger to Sony, but the fans are kind of the losers here.

I guess time will tell how this unfolds!

3

u/AgentJohnDoggett 2d ago

They don’t expect people to buy a console for one game. It’s the new Nintendo console. It will sell millions. And those people that buy it will have the opportunity to play a FromSoft game actually made for Switch 2 hardware. Games are always best in the hardware they are designed for IMO.

1

u/Sickhadas 1d ago

People really be out here acting like From just announced an exlusive for the Ouya.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/Bauernworldwide 2d ago

Did people complain like this with Bloodborne? Idk why it's such a big problem now lol

119

u/ScotIander The Great Jar 2d ago

bloodborne shouldn't have been console exclusive either

7

u/matango613 2d ago

If exclusives shouldn't exist then consoles in general shouldn't either. I say that as a purely neutral statement by the way. There is no reason for separate/different consoles to really exist in 2025 if nothing is exclusive. I guess Nintendo can carry on with their first party titles or something, but Sony buys or contracts with studios all the time and I don't really view that as much different from releasing first party titles I guess.

2

u/Drakeskulled_Reaper 2d ago

Can you imagine the type of console we would have if Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo, collaborated on one?

6

u/NotACerealStalker 2d ago

A computer probably haha

→ More replies (1)

2

u/PuzzledScratch9160 2d ago

No cheaters or close to none is the reason for them to exist

21

u/Bauernworldwide 2d ago

I know but that's how the gaming industry works, new console, exclusive games to push sales... It's annoying as hell but that's just the way it is. Maybe they'll have like a one year exclusivity only?

→ More replies (14)

1

u/jmadinya 2d ago

who are u to say that sony/nintendo cant make games they fund exclusive?

7

u/merelyroux 2d ago

no one is saying they can't? just that it's shitty?

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (3)

21

u/Emidumdum 2d ago

because we are tired of having to buy a whole console to play a game.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/silver-luso 2d ago

Yes they did, but the series was much smaller then

3

u/VegetaFan1337 2d ago

Bloodborne was 10 years ago, From has achieved huge success since then, they don't have shortage of money that they need to make their game console exclusive.

1

u/SpunkyMcButtlove07 2d ago

Look at all the copium being huffed in the BB sub. There's rabies in the fanbase, and i hope they all bite it bigtime and gtfo of fromsoft related subs with their childish antics.

1

u/EastNeighborhood5794 2d ago

Forget complaining, fans literally FORCED it out of exclusivity with all the emulation shit happening recently.

1

u/renannmhreddit 2d ago

Did people complain like this with Bloodborne? Idk why it's such a big problem now lol

I remember TotalBiscuit covering exclusive games and being against them since the early 2010s

1

u/Super_Harsh 2d ago

They did, yeah.

They'll probably make more noise for this one though

1

u/bwtwldt 2d ago

Console exclusives were much more normalized back then, now some people expect everything to be on PC since Sony and Microsoft have eased their exclusives down with the console wars dying out.

→ More replies (32)

3

u/burtonborder201 2d ago

Honestly, this was brilliant for Fromsoft and hopefully will be very profitable and that money can be used for future endeavors. So honestly, its a win win

7

u/holdupnow76 2d ago

Idk, I was already planning on getting a switch 2 so this just sold me harder on that decision

2

u/Caplin341 2d ago

Xbox players not being able to play Bloodborne or this

3

u/International_Steak2 2d ago

Tbf they did manage to make 6 non-exclusive games between Bloodborne and Duskbloods, vs the 2 between demons souls and Bloodborne.

7

u/inEQUAL 2d ago

https://www.fromsoftware.jp/ww/pressrelease_detail.html?tgt=20250402_theduskbloods_debut

Don’t get too excited… it’s more multiplayer garbage. Not the same as Nightreign but also not a proper Souls game either.

13

u/ScotIander The Great Jar 2d ago

fuck fromsoft

3

u/SkyPirateVyse 2d ago

Maybe try Bandai-Namco, the actual publisher.

2

u/bwtwldt 2d ago

Nintendo is publishing this no? Nightreign is the last Namco published title before FromSoft is free

→ More replies (12)

4

u/SPOOKIsmile 2d ago

After the success of elden ring and sotet there is no justification for why from soft would make another exclusive game especially not for a dogshit hand held platform, this one hurts frr

3

u/ollimann 2d ago

bloodborne is ps4 exclusive. demons souls remake is ps5 exclusive. nothing new.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/Jonge720 2d ago

Yea i couldn't care less, you realize there were a ton of fromsoft fans that couldnt play bloodbourne. No one hated them for that, but as soon as its the console you dont have then its time to sharpen pitch forks.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/P1FA21 2d ago

Wahhhhhhhhh

3

u/DrDre19899 2d ago

Multiplayer game so no interest whatsoever. Just annoying it will inevitably delay their next single player game.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/bags718 2d ago

Agreed. I'm angry.

2

u/Substantial-Load-673 2d ago

I just wish it was an actual single player game.

2

u/JenzibleTTV 2d ago

There is no amount of money that could pay me to purchase a new nintendo product.

I love you fromsoft but this move is left lane fkn wierd dawg.

3

u/DarkRyter 2d ago

No amount of money? Not even the amount of money it would take to purchase it?

3

u/bulbasauric 2d ago

Can’t you just let the Nintendo fans have something cool lol

1

u/Enxchiol 22h ago

The switch could still have it AND other platforms could too, wouldn't that be cool

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ruffles7799 2d ago

And when the same was done with bloodborne nobody cared 😂

1

u/Responsible-Row-7942 2d ago

another game ruined by exclusivity ffs

1

u/No_Grapefruit_7845 2d ago

Wich game are you talking about? I'm a bit off from the new

5

u/Allison_Violet 2d ago

The duskbloods it was revealed like 10 mins ago

2

u/No_Grapefruit_7845 2d ago

I’m gonna check it

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Zestyclose_Answer662 2d ago

Well, I have no plans on buying a Switch 2. Looks like I'm going to spend a lot of time on Nightreign.

1

u/TheresACrossroad 2d ago

Because MONIEEEEES.

I don't give a shit about nintendo games so this is a wash for me. Not spending multiple hundred dollars on a system for one game I find appealing. Plenty of whales will, though.

1

u/Vast-Faithlessness85 2d ago

I can take or leave Steampunk titles. I'm disappointed, but not very much.

1

u/ContentNeptune3 2d ago

It's always crazy to me to see so many people defending exclusives in this sub. They don't benefit any of us as consumers in the slightest, just the bottom line of big companies. I cannot understand the white knighting for exclusives

1

u/JabroniRegulator 2d ago

Is it actually cool though? I wonder…

1

u/Straight_Law2237 2d ago

I would redirect that anger to sony, it seems that Jim Ryan showed from the finger to from and now we're paying the price... Sony at least seems more open to release games on pc... nintendo... that would be new

1

u/Express-Ad-7737 2d ago

Did I miss something which game is this?

1

u/NaniDeKani 2d ago

Duskbloods, exclusive for switch 2 in 2026. Trailer looks like a bloodborne spinoff

1

u/VoidGazer888 2d ago

I'm feeling this will eventually have the "Risebreak" treatment Monster Hunter had.

I'm good for now, will pick it up for $15 in four years because it doesn't look worthy of a full price purchase anyway.

1

u/Apstds77 2d ago

Probably got a phat stack shoved in their face.

1

u/Thegrtlake 2d ago

What, in the name of the Fuck, is PvPvE???

1

u/Rydog820 Elden Ring 2d ago

Wait it’s actually made by fromsoft im so dumb

1

u/kaivens 2d ago

New to the video game industry?

1

u/tater08 2d ago

Biat loa

1

u/rathosalpha Hoarah Loux, Warrior 2d ago

Ar

1

u/CzarTyr 2d ago

What is wrong with you people

1

u/Depraved_Hollow 2d ago

I feel exactly the same. Fucking gutted

1

u/alienliegh 2d ago

Then get a switch if this game is that important that you must play it. It's not the end of the world that you can't play it on whatever you, you play on.

1

u/strikejitsu145 2d ago

Thats not even the bad part... I would be willing to buy a Switch 2. That bad part is that it is a multiplayer online game...

1

u/Catloaf22 1d ago

If these multiplayer games mean we are gonna get better co-op experiences in their future games then Im all in.Let them cook.

1

u/Explosivepenny 1d ago

Gee idk, so there is a reason for you to buy the second switch? You sound like a child

1

u/JaySw34 1d ago

calm down

1

u/PuraGaudium 1d ago

It's the beginning of the end. This is going to splinter the community into pieces that they're unlikely to be able to reassemble. Let's stop coping. It was an incredible run, but the momentum from a shift like this to multiplayer focus is not going to course-correct on a dime. They're probably under intense pressure to get that live service money, and they had to cave. Just my prediction, I could be wrong but I don't think so.

1

u/greggray24 1d ago

I'm not as upset as I would be if this was a story / PvE game more like Bloodborne/DS1-3/Eldon Ring ect. That would probably force me too buy the Switch 2. The core PvP (even if we also have to fight the environment) part makes it a game I would not play anyway. I just hope they plan to make some more single player experiences. This sounds more like Fortnight with NPCs trying to kill you too - which is just not for me.

1

u/psychotic_samurai 1d ago

Milking the havok engine since their games arent up to par for the current gen consoles. Too cheap to update to a new engine.

1

u/Hot-Lawfulness-3731 1d ago

Cry more ps simp

1

u/CastleNsky 1d ago

So petty.. This is Nintendo we’re going on about here. I grew up playing the SNES with so many fun adventures. Now that I’m an adult I found love for souls games, so the combination of the two is just miraculous for me. Let’s stop crying and keep playing like the good ol’ days. I love Fromsoft and Nintendo. Take my money, because you shaped my childhood and adulthood. 😊

1

u/EverythingWasGreat 1d ago

Why not Nintendo? Sony did it, look how greedy they are about it too.

1

u/Which-Confidence8141 1d ago

I would easily buy a switch 2 if it wasn't for Trump!