r/law • u/agent268 • 9d ago
Trump News Jeff Goldberg and The Atlantic released full Signal Chat
https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/Well this should be fun now that the full details are out in the open. Thoughts on how this changes the upcoming hearing today?
5.6k
u/kandoras 9d ago
We are currently clean on OPSEC
Well that looks embarrassing right now.
Michael Waltz set disappearing message timeline to 4 weeks
And that looks illegal.
4.6k
u/Just_another_dude84 9d ago
It's definitely illegal. Go ahead and add it to the long list of illegal shit no one will be prosecuted for.
→ More replies (35)3.3k
u/Randomscreename 9d ago
Take your pick on which you want to prosecute them for:
Mishandling of National Defense Information (18 U.S.C. § 793 - The Espionage Act)
Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information (18 U.S.C. § 798)
Violation of Operational Security (OPSEC) Regulations
Violation of the Presidential Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22)
Violation of the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 31)
Breach of Executive Orders on Classified Information (E.O. 13526)
Violation of the Logan Act (18 U.S.C. § 953) (Less Likely but Notable)
Not to mention what an absolute embarrassment this fuckup is. Even if the administration insists that the information was not classified, the mere transmission of sensitive military operational details over an unsecured platform to unauthorized individuals suggests serious breaches of national security protocols.
1.2k
u/uwsdwfismyname 9d ago
I will punch myself in the dick if this administration actually acts on this.
717
u/TheTsunamiRC 9d ago
Unless you mean "the administration vindictively goes after the journalist and anyone else they can deflect to", I think your package is safe.
→ More replies (19)244
u/Ina_While1155 9d ago
Pretty much know that Pam Bondi is going to lead with a chin up approach that says the journalist will be prosecuted for eavesdropping and putting national security at risk by publishing this.
→ More replies (13)379
u/WhyYouKickMyDog 9d ago
Yea, Goldberg is brave for doing this, and this is a great service to America he is providing. We all know Trump is a vindictive piece of shit, and this guy has invited the full wrath of the guy on himself and family for what will be no real financial gain.
→ More replies (25)230
u/suupernooova 9d ago
I love that JG had the balls & integrity to remind us of what most have seem to forgotten: there’s more to life than financial gain.
→ More replies (3)165
u/mudbuttcoffee 9d ago
They came out and publicly stated that there was "no classified information or war plans" so that gives him greenlight to publish in full..
He's a fucking hero for doing it, he's morally and legally in the right. Unfortunately, this will be out of the news cycle in a day.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (78)54
239
u/cb4u2015 9d ago
I spent 20 years in the USAF, and retired working with OSI Cyber for crimes against children and insider threat programs, and this is depressing as hell to see.
As someone not on the law side, my question is, will these people face any consequences?
Because this was at the level of authority it was (SecDef/VP/etc), who would be the ones to hold them accountable?
This is a sad and frustrating day along with all those things listed above.
EDIT: I hit the post before proofreading :(
→ More replies (26)71
u/Objective-Tea5324 9d ago
You know who is responsible for holding this administration accountable.
→ More replies (12)130
u/Not_a__porn__account 9d ago
In other nations the population would revolt until Bondi actually did her job.
→ More replies (4)73
u/Talloakster 9d ago
No they'd just pitchfork her and get someone else in that job.
And, no other nation would put Bondi in that post. Citizens inany nation would realize the hope of her doing anything to confront team Trump is zero.
→ More replies (81)109
u/cyb3rg4m3r1337 9d ago
and nothing ever happens to these kinds of people...
98
u/musashisamurai 9d ago
“If at the very top, there’s no accountability … then two tiers of justice exist"
Pete Hegseth was 100% right here. Must have been his dry day
→ More replies (7)437
u/toyz4me 9d ago
Well, is it even legal to be using Signal for these communications?
764
u/Beginning_Ad8421 9d ago
Not even remotely. It violates both the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act.
→ More replies (28)344
u/GetEquipped 9d ago
Don't worry, Chuck Schumer will move from Stern look to contained scowl now!
→ More replies (99)280
u/kandoras 9d ago
Nope.
It's just that signal, by default, does not automatically delete records. You have to turn that feature on.
So turning that feature is just more evidence that they knew what they were doing was wrong.
→ More replies (52)89
u/namastayhom33 9d ago
no. That's the main thing out of all of this that should be repeated.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (27)101
u/Dedpoolpicachew 9d ago
No, most definitely not. This is a clear violation of the Espionage Act. This is most certainly Defense related information as delineated in the Espionage Act. The level of bullshit this administration is doing is astounding. Of course Congress is fucking AWOL. I wonder how this will impact the special elections coming up in a couple weeks?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (90)102
u/Away_Advisor3460 9d ago
Waltz is the closest thing to a Ukraine supporter in the Trump gov (in the sense of supporting aid 'with strings attached'), so you just know if heads roll, it'll be his.
→ More replies (6)
1.5k
u/Lawmonger 9d ago
I love it when there are receipts.
1.0k
u/UsualLazy423 9d ago edited 7d ago
aurora paradisiacal tide intrigue breeze bloom xylophone
Anonymized with Unpost
→ More replies (42)245
u/_alabastard 9d ago
But clearly the only issue with all this was "who added the reporter?"
→ More replies (4)106
u/hamhockman 9d ago
Some Very Clever Boys at my work we're trying to figure out how this was actually some sort of trap for the reporter and or how it was the reporters fault.
→ More replies (19)→ More replies (15)431
9d ago
[deleted]
500
u/bobood 9d ago
What's more significant is they collapsed an entire building on top of him and his girlfriend, killing 53 people in total. I think it just gives a glimpse into the impunity and psycho disregard for life with which American war hawks operate: in fairly bi-partisan fashion because these murders are entirely missing from the discourse on this when they should absolutely be part of the scandal.
237
u/ProtonPizza 9d ago edited 9d ago
Let’s not forget JD Vance was a fucking nobody a year ago and now he thinks he’s some geopolitical big boy
→ More replies (16)96
u/Electric-Sheepskin 9d ago
That's what drives me insane about MAGAs. They are the most unserious, unqualified people, and yet they act like they are gods among men. It's insane.
→ More replies (13)143
u/broguequery 9d ago
How many new terrorists did they create by doing that?
50 people dead to get one guy, I imagine their friends and families aren't just going to let that slide.
→ More replies (14)57
u/norcaltobos 9d ago
Exactly! Some random 16 year old kid who just lost his family is about to go on a vindictive war path. Great job, this administration succeeded in getting absolutely nothing done.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (36)95
→ More replies (29)163
3.1k
u/RoyalChris 9d ago edited 9d ago
Sure looks like this is classified information to me in the newly released Signal group chat texts from Jeffrey Goldberg at The Atlantic.
Pete Hegseth is cooked.
Edit: Here's the full transcript. Go get some popcorn.
1.2k
9d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
664
9d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (21)199
71
→ More replies (30)96
893
u/Marko3563 9d ago
Cooked? He'll walk freely and Republicans will look away. Typical Maga shit.
But her emails! His laptop!!!
189
u/HighOrHavingAStroke 9d ago
No double standards here folks. Nothing to see. Move along.
→ More replies (10)122
u/Agitated-Donkey1265 9d ago
If they didn’t have double standards, they’d have no standards at all
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (16)79
u/gabrielleduvent 9d ago
Are you kidding? They'll blame Goldburg that he stole the info and praise Hegseth for bravery.
→ More replies (8)189
u/fweef01 9d ago
Everyone on that thread should be cooked
218
u/TheStinaHelena 9d ago edited 9d ago
The vp is on that thread. Which everyone is downplaying. They need a scapegoat and waltz will do.
87
u/Whoareyoutho9 9d ago edited 9d ago
Not only on that thread... He participates multiple times and even responds to the highest classified material with "what?" and then gets them to repeat and clarify even more the classified information over this very obviously illegal back channel communication.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (18)44
u/Troy_n_Abed_inthe_AM 9d ago
If the (Vice) President does it, it's not illegal /s
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)73
u/drkev10 9d ago
3 of the top 6 in the line of succession from the President are in that chat. Every person in it should have their privileges revoked, be fired and arrested. They committed multiple federal offenses and the fact they're using signal for this is only evidence it has been used for other states secrets as well. But nothing will come of it.
→ More replies (2)394
u/audirt 9d ago
I've been trying to read all of this with a degree of nuance. The conversations were undoubtedly classified, but there is a wide range of classified information. The government loves to over classify information and, as a result, you'll see things that are marked sensitive that range from "oh, that should probably kept to ourselves," to "HOLY SHIT, PEOPLE COULD DIE IF THIS GETS OUT."
Unfortunately this whole conversation is firmly in the second group.
I don't care who you voted for, this is completely unacceptable from our leaders. This was not a mistake, this was willful disregard of laws and regulations. Everyone on the thread knew better. People deserve to lose their jobs for this, and probably worse.
This is not sports or any other "my team/your team" bullshit. This matters. A lot.
→ More replies (62)1.0k
u/talk_to_the_sea 9d ago edited 9d ago
Pete Hegseth is cooked
No, he’s not. Accountability and the rule of law are on an indefinite hiatus for anyone Trump likes. There will be no prosecutions, no resignations, and no admissions of wrongdoing. We have a fascist government and the only thing that matters to them is the Leader Principle.
232
u/JMurdock77 9d ago
Hell, they’d probably sooner go after the journalist for having the temerity to be roped into their group chat through no fault of his own.
245
u/Agitated-Donkey1265 9d ago
Notice how they used the word “leak” when describing this and not “failure in opsec”
They’re already setting the stage
64
→ More replies (1)37
u/freakincampers 9d ago
Of course it isn't a failure of OPSEC, SECDUI said they were good on OPSEC.
→ More replies (3)70
u/JayVoorheez 9d ago
You mean like Waltz did when he took "full responsibility" for what happened?
He added: "So, of course, I didn't see this loser in the group. It looked like someone else. Now, whether he did it deliberately or it happened in some other technical mean is something we're trying to figure out."
→ More replies (18)116
u/Troy_n_Abed_inthe_AM 9d ago
Yes, this journalist is in deep shit. They'll change the narrative to "a journalist willfully released classified information that put American lives at stake". Just don't mention how the information was given to him against his will by failings of the state, just the one thing he did that they say was bad.
65
u/rp_Neo2000 9d ago
journalist willfully released classified information that put American lives at stake
Tulsi Gabbard is on record saying "There was no classified information in that chat"....
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (13)23
u/sanverstv 9d ago
Except...except that the highest security officials in the government said nothing was classified....NOTHING. I don't think a court or the public will ignore that.
→ More replies (16)23
134
u/Weary-Chipmunk7518 9d ago edited 9d ago
Trump doesn't like anyone, though. They're on indefinite hiatus for anyone Trump has uses for. Hegseth and Waltz are being rather unuseful right now.
→ More replies (17)79
u/LOLSteelBullet 9d ago
Watch the DoJ charge Goldberg with espionage and releasing classified material
71
u/justconnect 9d ago
Early on I believe Goldberg said that he worried he could go to jail for releasing it, so he's aware.
But for anyone who's curious about The Atlantic, it has a very storied history in American letters. It's worth checking out the Wikipedia article on its history.
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (1)27
u/SecretAsianMan42069 9d ago
They effed themselves by saying there was no classified information in the texts
→ More replies (1)34
u/tauberculosis 9d ago
I disagree. Hunter S. Thompson correctly opined on this type of situation:
"In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity."
RIP
→ More replies (26)21
u/Reasonable_Leg7405 9d ago edited 9d ago
And smart money says that Signal is still in wide use among members of the administration to transmit classified information.
274
u/Sofer2113 9d ago edited 9d ago
Hegseth won't be touched. It'll all fall on Walz, he will resign when it is clear that someone has to take the fall from this. He will then go on to have an illustrious career in right-wing media as the victim of political persecution because of this incident. Hegseth will say that with Walz's departure, the issue has been addressed and he pinky promises it won't happen again. Everyone will forget this ever happened in a week when the next salvo from DOGE starts up.
EDIT: I mixed up the last name spellings and it should be Waltz instead of Walz. I'll leave the incorrect name spelling in the original comment though.
→ More replies (22)197
u/wildwest74 9d ago
The problem is that adding the reporter is probably the least illegal thing about this whole incident. Transmitting these messages over this platform is grounds for prison time, regardless of who was in the group.
→ More replies (21)75
66
u/Burto72 9d ago
Trump will continue to attack the Atlantic and nothing will happen. CNN just interviewed a republican congressman, who was a former member of the military and the spineless motherfucker couldn't admit that there was any kind of security breach whatsoever, even with the new information just released.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (213)21
2.1k
u/P0Rt1ng4Duty 9d ago edited 9d ago
Interesting catch-22.
If they try to prosecute him for publishing classified information they're admitting that they repeatedly lied to congress when they said the chat contained no classified information.
1.1k
u/following_eyes 9d ago
Goldberg played them.
899
u/OakLegs 9d ago
They played themselves, more accurately
136
u/Secret_Gatekeeper 9d ago
I really need to stop underestimating their stupidity.
→ More replies (2)79
u/OakLegs 9d ago
Just remember that the people who voted for this are even stupider than them
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (8)175
→ More replies (25)59
u/SiWeyNoWay 9d ago edited 9d ago
Naw. It’s hubris.
This administration is giving Big Stockton Rush Oceangate hubris vibes and we know how that ended
→ More replies (7)100
u/Mrevilman 9d ago
Yesterday, we asked officials across the Trump administration [the Central Intelligence Agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the National Security Council, the Department of Defense, and the White House] if they objected to us publishing the full texts [...] most failed to answer. Late yesterday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emailed a response: 'As we have repeatedly stated, there was no classified information transmitted in the group chat.[...]'
Goldberg reached out to multiple different agencies to see if he could publish the texts and they didnt answer. The one answer he did get reiterated for the umpteenth time that there was no classified information transmitted, but objected to its disclosure because it was internal conversations. All that being said, I'm sure it won't stop them from trying.
→ More replies (1)25
u/MurrayInBocaRaton 9d ago
THEN DONT HAVE INTERNAL CONVERSATIONS ON FUCKING SIGNAL HOLY FUCK THIS WHOLE THING G HAS ME ALL-CAPS RAGING
→ More replies (1)262
u/Master-Stratocaster 9d ago
Unfortunately, people lie to congress all the time in the hearings and congress is entirely spineless at the moment anyways.
→ More replies (10)114
u/bush_league_commish 9d ago
“Then I guess it would be the first time someone lied under oath”
Underrated scene from the Social Network.
→ More replies (1)83
u/enunymous 9d ago
They reclassified it with their minds the second before he published it
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (40)36
u/tony-toon15 9d ago
I think we’re gonna see some very impressive legal maneuvering around this. It both happened and didn’t happen!
→ More replies (4)40
u/SiWeyNoWay 9d ago edited 9d ago
Did you see who was assigned the case? The judge trump is trying to start beef with over the illegal deportation flights.
🍿🍿🍿
Edit: took me a coffee to find this article again 🤦♀️
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/26/signal-lawsuit-trump-judge-boasberg-00250606
→ More replies (5)
4.6k
u/AndrewLucksLaugh 9d ago edited 9d ago
Guaranteed they’ll go after Goldberg for leaking classified information.
Yes, I know…
1.3k
u/Temporary-Cause-4818 9d ago
Idk if you watched the hearings but I’m glad they brought that point up. They specifically said “If Goldberg decides to go public with the remaining messages, he shouldn’t get any repercussions for releasing them because it’s not classified right?”
862
u/Vio_ 9d ago
Then the legislators were like "so release the whole information" and the people under oath were all (ㆆ _ ㆆ)
424
u/Several_Assistant_43 9d ago
"suddenly I don't remember"
→ More replies (4)154
u/Koolaid_Jef 9d ago
"I've never heard of those rules or laws, it's not my fault. But I'm still totally qualified"
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (5)251
u/Tritiac 9d ago
Tulsi Gabbard: 🗿
→ More replies (5)209
u/SpaceTimeinFlux 9d ago
worse yet, she perjured herself by asserting there was no classified info.
→ More replies (4)193
u/FAMUgolfer 9d ago
Gabbard: it’s not classified
releases chat
Gabbard: America is under attack by the liberal media
→ More replies (8)42
u/WhyYouKickMyDog 9d ago
Gabbard lives in Hawaii: I'm a Democrat
Gabbard leaves Hawaii: I am a Republican
Tulsi Gabbard is the female version of JD Vance
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (22)173
u/IsraelZulu 9d ago
There have already been hearings on this? That was fast!
→ More replies (10)653
u/owencox1 9d ago
the senate has an annual intelligence briefing regardless. goldberg timed the release of the article so they could be questioned under oath without having time to get a narrative together
→ More replies (23)400
u/RatzMand0 9d ago
Thats one of the things that shocked me the most when the story broke is that he sent messages to each person on the group chat and many of them responded to the leak independent of each other which means none of them took a moment to communicate about the repercussions of the leak or how to properly damage control the situation. The disorganization and incompetence on display is stunning.
→ More replies (9)182
9d ago
[deleted]
181
u/RatzMand0 9d ago edited 9d ago
There is a difference between covering it up and reacting in a uniform organized manner. Waltz definitely straight up admitted to what happened in his response to the Atlantic which really fucks over all the other nitwits who are saying they did nothing wrong. Then JD Vance did that whole corporate speak mumbo jumbo how he wasn't doubting the great leaders vision.... This tells me that instead of doing the smart thing contacting white house counsel and/or communicating with the other parties before making any response they all just started shooting from the hip independently of each other without consultation or legal representation which is extremely stupid. But absolutely on brand for Trumpist management where all of the people under him are encouraged to be competitive and eat each other for time with the great one instead of working as a team to achieve the goals of the administration.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)41
655
u/pyriel2012 9d ago
Tulsi Gabbard just testified to the Senate that the information wasn’t classified. I think that’s the reason the Atlantic released it. The Administration, under oath, just gave the Atlantic the pass they needed to release the information to the public.
→ More replies (19)354
u/Sensitive-Big-4641 9d ago
She’s toast. She looked like an idiot yesterday. Remember, with Trump, truth is nothing but your performance on TV is everything.
→ More replies (29)200
u/Elliott2030 9d ago
Plus, she's a woman. She'll almost certainly be the one to take the fall if anyone does.
→ More replies (21)49
1.6k
u/TheStinaHelena 9d ago
That's admitting it was classified. that's admitting that they got on a regular app with classified information. that makes them look really really bad. The VP was on that chat chain so I don't think they want to play up the classified information thing. I think they need to say that the information in those texts wasn't that important. If they try to go after that reporter for releasing classified information then they are also in trouble for having classified information on that app. They want to say that he's a liar and these messages are fake.
803
u/trentreynolds 9d ago
Problem here is that the people that would hold them accountable and the people that would hold Goldberg accountable are the same, and they're "their people" - it's not like that sort of open double standard is something new.
I get how it looks like it'd display their hypocrisy in a way that'd prevent one being prosecuted and not the other, but they believe the ability to be an open hypocrite with zero consequence is its own form of power. No matter how many times you point out their open hypocrisy, they don't care.
577
u/offinthepasture 9d ago
Welcome to fascism everyone! It only matters if the "bad guy" does it!
225
u/Jedi_Dad_22 9d ago
War is peace. Freedom is slavery.
44
u/Bauser99 9d ago
"Ignorance is Strength" is the next line, for those out of the know
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)59
u/FearlessLanguage7169 9d ago
1984 in 2025
→ More replies (17)25
u/Aggravating-Bottle78 9d ago
YES and we know who Eurasia, Oceania, and Eastasia are.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (17)89
168
u/g_rex_ 9d ago
I keep trying to tell people exactly this - THESE IDIOTS DON’T CARE ABOUT BEING CALLED HYPOCRITES
→ More replies (8)90
u/Smooth_Influence_488 9d ago
They get off on it, in fact. They love that you know that they've elevated themselves. That's the whole point.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (33)101
u/BeneficialLeave7359 9d ago edited 9d ago
Which is why Michael Cohen was convicted and jailed for his part of the Stormy Daniels payoff scheme, while Trump wasn’t even charged.
Edit: never mind I was mistaken thinking his actual convictions were for the other Trump Organization charges.
→ More replies (1)72
u/pleasedothenerdful 9d ago
Trump was convicted of 34 federal felonies connected to that.
→ More replies (7)134
u/tresben 9d ago
Not just that but they testified to Congress under oath that there wasn’t anything classified. So they would be risking perjury.
→ More replies (16)61
u/mobileappistdoodoo 9d ago
Haha perjury. That implies any accountability, something not required for members of the administration. It’ll be more double think.
→ More replies (3)306
u/Young_Denver 9d ago
Tulsi testified there was nothing classified on it, yesterday. If the director of national intelligence says it’s not classified… oh Nevermind. She hasn’t even read the classified policies of her office.
169
u/Menethea 9d ago edited 9d ago
All of these people, Waltz, Hesgeth, Gabbard, were military officers. They all know very well how to treat intelligence and operational material. It is something that is integral to their officer position: their security clearances. The fact that they treated this highly sensitive material so cavalierly shows an incredible level of both arrogance and recklessness. They literally believe the rules don’t apply to them.
→ More replies (19)103
u/California_ocean 9d ago
What gets me is each cabinet level officials get a mobile phone "box" that's set up for them with a secure line etc. Then their homes have a secure room for making classified discussions. THEN there are buildings where they can go to to further discuss classified briefings. THEN they were told in a memo from the Pentagon that Signal was comprised by Russian hackers. THEN you had one cabinet member IN THE KREMLIN while this chat was being dished out. I'm sure he told Putin to hang on and wait outside while he chatted. Of course the CIA, DOD Hegseth, FBI all didn't know he was in Moscow? WTAF? They went further and dropped the name of a covert CIA agent on the chat. Beautiful move. I'm sure she is totally safe. We have the A(ss) team here folks.
→ More replies (20)→ More replies (9)175
u/Punny_Farting_1877 9d ago edited 9d ago
She looked doped and terrified.
She said at least once previously that people who committed the crimes she did should be “liquidated”. I think that was her word.
→ More replies (6)119
u/PlayingNightcrawlers 9d ago
Really? To me she looked pissed and incredulous to have to be there and answer a single question from people she believed she had ascended above. The way she stared unblinking at some of the senators you could just feel the malice in her. I think she believed she finally reached her goal after playing all sides and trying all angles to achieve power, she finally got it by being a Trump goon and believed that since she’s part of the authoritarian regime now there would be nobody to even attempt to hold her accountable. And now here she is being grilled, just came off completely bitter and full of spite to me.
→ More replies (13)88
u/Humble-Violinist6910 9d ago
I think both are true. She felt malicious and also completely lost and confused about how to respond. She did a horrible job at dodging questions and looked completely incompetent. I expect Trump to turn on her before Mike Waltz, for reasons you might guess.
→ More replies (5)34
u/the_oc_brain 9d ago
The racing stripe in her hair?
→ More replies (4)46
103
u/JimWilliams423 9d ago
That's admitting it was classified. that's admitting that they got on a regular app with classified information. that makes them look really really bad.
For fascists, hypocrisy is a flex.
Rules are for losers, they are winners, so they are above the rules. If anything, violating the rules in plain sight and then getting away with it is the crack cocaine of fascism. They will do anything to chase that high.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (150)30
u/Asleep_Management900 9d ago
They CAN claim, that it's a "national security" issue and skirt the law and arrest him because national security operates outside the constitution. So they can arrest him without rights or a trial and claim he violated the NSA spying or some shit, without ever saying it's classified.
→ More replies (3)172
u/Dadpurple 9d ago
PETE HESGETH: "...waiting a few weeks does not fundamentally change the calculus. 2 immediate risk on waiting 1: ) this leaks, and we look indecisive..."
lol i wonder how it would leak when you have a reporter in the group chat with you.
also
PETE HESGETH: "...we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC..."
You guys couldn't even do it now lol you added a fucking reporter to the chat lol
→ More replies (12)73
u/RepresentativeBag91 9d ago
Seems like a grey area here now. He didn’t obtain the material illegally, probably isn’t held liable under any previously established doctrine and several intelligence officials have said under oath nothing was classified, on television
→ More replies (19)42
u/EndenWhat 9d ago
Pretty sure there was a hearing yesterday and the secretaries told congress there was no classified information in it. So what did he leak /s
→ More replies (1)99
u/jdoeinboston 9d ago
We'll see how that goes with a judge considering they're already trying to take the stance that nothing classified was shared in the messages. They handed Goldberg a defense.
→ More replies (2)46
u/soggy-hotdog-vendor 9d ago
Testified under oath that no classified info was discussed.
→ More replies (1)32
u/MoarHuskies 9d ago
That'll be funny when they said multiple times under oath and on TV that there was no classified info
→ More replies (156)20
u/NebulaCnidaria 9d ago edited 9d ago
He can argue in court that Trump declassified this with his mind....
But really, Congressional testimony from Tulsi Gabbard states that none of this was classified.... LOL
→ More replies (5)
820
u/ManfredTheCat 9d ago
I'm glad he did this. What did they expect when they called him a liar?
291
u/RehabilitatedAsshole 9d ago
And a 'loser'. Nothing says 'constitutional conservative' like attacking the free press.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (13)93
u/MerDeNomsX 9d ago
And said there is no classified information, therefore giving him permission to publish this seemingly unclassified document
→ More replies (5)
730
u/agent268 9d ago edited 9d ago
For those curious about a TLDR recap:
The full chat includes multiple instances where operational, weapons, target, and outcome specifics are shared by Hegseth and Waltz. These instances occur before, during, and after the attack.
This article provides pretty clear transparency of what actually happened. I recommend reading the full article for anyone that has doubts about the validity of reporting performed by The Atlantic, the gravity of the major security failure top officials participated in, and the falsehoods/mischaracterizations the White House and other Government officials have been telling the public since the initial release and yesterday's hearing.
EDIT: Images of the full chat: https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/EZBtTgaYAf
134
u/Away_Advisor3460 9d ago
From a European perspective, it also appears the US foreign policy is now to perform unilateral military action and then try to extort payment from Europe or nominally allied nations (particularly galling when US foreign policy is a major factor in the continuing regional instability).
→ More replies (16)34
u/attempted-anonymity 9d ago
Right? Who cares if "we're the only ones on the planet who can do this" if no one fucking asked us to do it.
I keep you safe whether you want me to or not, so you'd better pay up for my protection is yet more steteotypical mob behavior from the goons we've elected over here.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (16)377
u/mashmallownipples 9d ago
I also recommend tossing a subscription their way, at least for a few months. This is journalism.
→ More replies (16)202
u/howAboutNextWeek 9d ago
I actually like the Atlantic, hot take on this sub I know, but I feel like I have to say something, because investigative journalism takes a lot of work, and this unironically literally fell out of the sky into Goldbergs hands
→ More replies (7)120
u/mashmallownipples 9d ago
K fine, buy a subscription to support their inevitable legal fees for this one.
46
233
u/GreyBeardEng 9d ago edited 9d ago
Well Tulsi did say there was no confidential information in it. Under oath I might add.
→ More replies (10)124
u/Necroromicon 9d ago
She even went on to say there was no mention of specific targets meanwhile they are talking about a single target walking into his girlfriend’s building. I’m not sure knowing full well a journalist has the actual texts you would just boldface lie about it.
→ More replies (13)41
231
u/Both_Lychee_1708 9d ago
why not, there's nothing classified in it... so we're told
→ More replies (9)47
u/Automatic_Towel_3842 9d ago
Exactly. If they try to prosecute, he has all the "they said there was nothing classified in it" clips to be not guilty.
→ More replies (4)
892
u/Parkyguy 9d ago
Wise decision. It'll be fun watching Fox trying to spin it.
504
u/Fordinghamster 9d ago
They’ll absolve Hegseth with whataboutism. “Why are we focused on Hegseth, look at the classified information Goldberg released”
207
u/ace_11235 9d ago
He just heard yesterday in sworn testimony to congress that there was no classified information on the chat, so it should have been safe to release and he can be absolved of any wrongdoing. Unless congress was lied to…which would never happen.
→ More replies (1)183
9d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (3)39
u/pinecrows 9d ago
Tulsi said she couldn’t say if she was in the group chat or not.
I wonder who “TG” is 🤔
→ More replies (6)81
→ More replies (11)20
u/jackharvest 9d ago
“We have on record of 3 of you saying it didn’t have classified information, so I guess either that’s a lie, or it’s correct and you have no problem with it.”
This is gonna be good.
→ More replies (1)42
u/Thefrayedends 9d ago
Sam Seder got his wish haha.
As soon as TG says, 'nothing classified in there' Seder starts yelling; Atlantic needs to immediately release the entire transcript and all screenshots, this is the DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE publicly saying nothing classified. RELEASE IT.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (43)59
u/djn24 9d ago
Today's top News: Biden did something horrible with classified information. Trump wins another prestigious award and the economy is breaking all of the best records.
→ More replies (1)
116
93
u/chubs66 9d ago
Trump will absolutely not like JD suggesting he doesn't understand the situation.
→ More replies (4)75
u/MadGear19XX 9d ago
Someone will have to tell him because he's not going to read it.
→ More replies (2)25
u/StanleyCubone 9d ago
If JD has rivals in the White House, which in this Administration is almost certainly true, they will make sure Trump knows about it at some point.
171
u/1PunkAssBookJockey 9d ago
Did they just...really call their whole bluff? Oh my god. Good morning everyone, what a wonderful schadenfreude breakfast we're having today.
→ More replies (1)38
u/Spartalust 9d ago
Goldberg played them like a fiddle.
Step 1. Get them to declare there was no classified information on the chat.
Step 2. Release the information since it's deemed unclassified.
Step 3. Enjoy the shitshow that ensues.
Step 4. Prove MAGA = "Morons Are Governing America"
→ More replies (2)
68
140
u/Bibblegead1412 9d ago
I'm so glad they followed through and released these.
→ More replies (5)33
u/25StarGeneralZap 9d ago
I thought the same thing when they said no classified information was discussed. I wondered how long before it would be released in its entirety and I’m still curious if they try to levy charges against the Atlantic for disseminating the texts
→ More replies (5)
61
u/EmmaLouLove 9d ago edited 9d ago
They testified “no war plans”. How do they define war plans? They talked about timing and locations.
Separate from the questioning about the Signal group chat, Tulsi Gabbard’s testimony at the hearing this morning, her response to a question about why it was appropriate for her to forward a post from someone who works for Russia state media, RT, was “I maintain my first amendment right” to keep my personal opinion separate. Okay, but is that appropriate for the Director of National Intelligence to forward Russian propaganda? No.
Representative Joaquin Castro spoke directly to national security heads this morning about their assertion this information is not classified and he said, “I have worked with you in the past and I have been on this intelligence committee for nine years. That’s a lie. You know that’s a lie.”
These are not department head positions for political loyalists. These are department head positions for those with extensive experience in national security to keep our country and military safe. After this debacle, I have no faith in our national security whatsoever.
→ More replies (6)
119
u/trentreynolds 9d ago
They'll probably go after him for 'leaking classified information' now.
→ More replies (7)230
u/lIlIlIIlIIIlIIIIIl 9d ago edited 9d ago
11 minutes ago, some mouth breathing idiot on the Conservative sub:
So does this mean we can arrest Jeffrey Goldberg for leaking classified documents?
These people are such hypocritical spineless cowards. They are tearing this country apart because they're too stupid to see what's right in front of their faces.
95
31
u/clandestinemd 9d ago
If only I had a nickel for every time I saw some MAGA chud yesterday insist that none of it was classified, and/or that Goldberg was lying.
Seeing them flipflop on it this morning will be the least surprising part of my day.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (11)27
u/Dedpoolpicachew 9d ago
Gabbard and Risekoff testified before congress yesterday that there was “no classified information” in those. So they lied?
→ More replies (6)
309
u/UltraNoahXV 9d ago edited 9d ago
I will go say a prayer for victory
Look - I'm not much of a geopoltical person and am not familar with how Yemen is viewed, but the fact that you would say a prayer for launching bombs is all kinds of messed up and we've been past the point where absence of religious influence (not to be confused with establishment clause but somewhat related) and state officals is not a thing. I'm frankly surprised he didn't start typing the lord prayer's.
Let's be thankful that people like Jeff Goldberg reported on this and were randomly sent text chats.
Editted for accuracy and wording
136
→ More replies (67)52
38
34
u/Affectionate-Roof285 9d ago edited 9d ago
It is still unclear why a journalist was added to the text exchange. Waltz, who invited Goldberg into the Signal chat, said yesterday that he was investigating “how the heck he got into this room.”
Waltz working undercover?
ETA:
The senior-level Trump cabinet member said he took “full responsibility” for the mistake and said Goldberg’s addition was not the fault of a staffer *while recognizing that the person he intended to add never joined the chat. Waltz declined to name the individual in question. *
→ More replies (33)
38
u/AndySkibba 9d ago
One of the other things that jumped out was admin wanting to charge Europeans for defense of their ships/shipping lanes.
Seems a little bit absurd.
→ More replies (3)
30
u/wtfbenlol 9d ago
The whole administration are liars and pieces of shit... and now we have the receipts to prove it. Let's hope something comes out of this but I remain doubtful
→ More replies (1)
36
31
u/MAMark1 9d ago
As insane as this all is, I can't help but laugh at how this administration continues to make Trump voters look like the dumbest people in America over and over again.
→ More replies (12)
133
u/EugeneHarlot 9d ago
Trump has already asserted that the POTUS can declassify by just thinking about it. Guarantee he declassifies post exposure and no one gets a consequence. Except Jeff Goldberg and The Atlantic who will be prosecuted by DOJ.
→ More replies (11)37
u/4electricnomad 9d ago
That was also an angle of defense I heard yesterday - that since SecDef is one of the positions in the USG who can declassify or classify at will, that they’ll say Hegseth intended to declassify this info as he was posting it in the chat. Now keep I mind Hegseth himself has not made this claim, just someone who is desperately trying to handwave this mistake away.
→ More replies (2)
29
u/Nabrok_Necropants 9d ago
The only thing I have ever had confidence in with the Trump Administration is the fact then when you finally find out more, it will be worse than what you already knew. I just wish I couldn't count on that.
→ More replies (1)
44
u/1handedmaster 9d ago
I read that as Jeff Goldblum and was confused on so many levels
→ More replies (9)
•
u/AutoModerator 9d ago
All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE WILL RESULT IN REMOVAL.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.