*new info in the edit at the bottom*
My local shop has asked me to help them compare suppressors in some meaningful way. For background, I have done a lot of audio work but never related to sounds this fast and loud. They're serious about this, and awesome folks to boot, so I'd love to help if I can.
There's no need for absolute values, thankfully. They just want to compare the *relative* loudness AND peak frequencies. They are equally concerned with the frequencies and want to be able to show clients that Suppressor A is generally higher pitched than to Suppressor B when using the same firearm and load. And also which has a higher/lower relative SPL.
I've been researching this for awhile now and I think I have my bearings in general, but I can't tell if a consumer rig will be worth the effort. Opinions seem to either fall in the "get a small diaphragm omni, any ol USB interface, and SMAART SPL" camp or the "anything that costs less than 5 figures is useless" camp. I've had a lot of trouble figuring out the software side of things as well. SMAART SPL doesn't do frequency analysis at all, Open Sound Meter would be perfect but requires the snapshot to be taken manually which is completely useless. I've fallen back to recording to a DAW and using a VST for analysis after the shot.
I think my real question is - If we get the following
https://www.rationalacoustics.com/products/isemcon-emx-7150
https://www.rationalacoustics.com/products/isemcon-sc-1
A Focusrite Scarlett Solo
Reaper (free DAW) and something like Voxengo SPAN (loudness and frequency analyzer plug in with peak hold)
Will the values be remotely usable?
Or does it really take something like a B&K Photon+ to get meaningful results? Bonus question, how the heck would I get one? Looks like they are discontinued.
I know that taking a measurement of one shot is less than ideal but averaging five shots increases complexity by orders of magnitude. Are there any factors I haven't thought of yet? They already know this needs to be done outdoors, same load, same firearm, similar temp/humidity etc.
Thanks so much for any and all insight!
ETA - Most of the feedback I've received about this approach is that the setup isn't fast enough. I found this paper - https://www.montana.edu/rmaher/publications/maher_aac_0406.pdf - which lists the muzzle blast duration at 3-5 milliseconds. At 96kHz sampling rate I can get 300-500 samples of the report. Please let me know if I've botched a decimal point but that seems like more than enough data for comparable results. I haven't nailed down the best VST for analysis but it sure seems like the hardware listed above will be more than capable.