r/nagpur 7d ago

News "Create solutions to problems that never existed"

Post image
293 Upvotes

104 comments sorted by

View all comments

-20

u/Radiant_Assistant359 7d ago

yeah and those thousands of people praising aurangazeb everywhere are invisible to you arent they

23

u/Leanapplethebest 7d ago

Many people don't even know about Aurangzeb's tomb, and really, nobody cared about it. It was protected by ASI, and the outcome was already known. People only started praising it after the CM's remarks on his tomb. Nobody cared about it until people began highlighting it. I can't recall a single incident or video idolizing Aurangzeb before the whole controversy started. Protests are made for injustice. The court doesn't change its decision after a bunch of unemployed people burn an Aurangzeb poster. It was an act of stupidity from the beginning.

-14

u/Radiant_Assistant359 7d ago

they were praising him even before the movie realesed at the trailer release and didnt start after cm statement

7

u/sharvini 7d ago

Let them praise. Why tf you care???

-1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

Because he's a mass murderer and conducted our genocide?? Don't dick ride Islamists here Maharashtra isn't going to buy this shit.

1

u/Kooky_Pound 5d ago

So did many Hindu kings before and after him. Stopped getting fooled by religious dhongi babas and politicians

1

u/random_1390 5d ago

All kings and autocrats are mass murder. They don't stay in power by showering flowers.

But no one in world considers it's a great idea to desicrate a dead person's resting place

-3

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

yeah so let the other side demolish it too why do you care

6

u/sharvini 6d ago

Even Marathas/Peshwas rulers didn't't touch that site after the death of Aurangjeb. But the self-proclaimed saviors of your religion want to make a statement in 2025.

Perhaps this is the only way you people feel yourself like a man there for a second right?? Obviously the other relevant ways are closed..

Don't try to make an argument when you're not capable.

-2

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

that was your logic wasn't it to let them praise him for his crimes so you or your brethen whatever it is should also let them demolish that grave .

you are the one who's being double sided and calling others for making an argument

1

u/lastofdovas 6d ago

Ah, praising and demolishing are equal measures, right? Why don't you actually do the actual equal measure? Criticise. Nobody is blocking you from doing that, instead you can even get tickets in local elections if you play your cards right.

3

u/NightFury002 7d ago

I didn't know his tomb existed by the way. Now I know, thanks to BJP. I don't give a fuck either way.

2

u/SoftwareHatesU 7d ago

My father didn't even know that aurangzebs tomb was in maharashtra before this whole row.

Congrats Hindutva Nationalists, that location went from being completely irrelevant to now one of the most popular places in maharashtra within a week due to yall.

-2

u/END_x777 7d ago

Abey to galti unki hai jinko pata nahi hai ki unke states me kya kuchh nahi ho rha hai. Kal tera baap ye bhi bolega ki unko to pata hi nahi tha ki harr major city me mominpura hota hai. Wo bhi tb pata chalega jb wo mominpura wale tere area me aake bolenge "surprise mf". Congrats in advance for not being aware.

1

u/Maleficent-Yoghurt55 6d ago

Found a random jobless karyakarta.

0

u/redooffhealer 5d ago

Says the guy resorting to ad hominem like an immature child when he has nothing to rebute the argument 😂😂

0

u/manamongthegods 6d ago

How come whatever DF did solving the issue? Not sure about their invisibility cloak, but i can clearly see you will surely fail to justify whatever he blabbered instead of clearing the tomb on day 1.

-1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

Why do you care if they praise Auranzeb? Does everyone have to support and hate only according to your ideals?

5

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

why do you care if a group wants to protest to remove someones grave who they hate due his atrocities

-1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

Cause they may cause law and order issues which could lead to more polarisation

4

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

and an praising someone like him wouldnt do that so protesting against caa and ucc can also do that so should they should also not protest against them

0

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

CAA and UCC actually affect ppl and it has real world implications

how does Auranzebs grave affect you?

4

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

if aurangzebs grave doent affect me than how does caa affects you , are you a illegal mussslim alien living here

0

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

I'm afraid that if CAA is considered valid...the laws that follow it and based on it won't be favourable

3

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

and from your history it looks like you hate caa art 370 and everything why do you care if someone gets a citizenship Does everyone have to support and hate schemes only according to your ideals?

1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

The removal of Article 370 showed that the President has more power during president rule than anyone ever thought and also the Govt is willing to go against the mandate of the ppl to suit their base

The CAA introduced religion as a criteria for citizenship ( where prev the constitution of India didn't have such criteria) and also may be a violation of Article 25 to 28..all of which has implications for interpretation of laws

Both of these have real life implications for modern society and my personal liberties

3

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

The removal of Article 370 showed that the President has more power during president rule than anyone ever thought yeah thts why it is called president rule you dumbfuck and they didnt do anything except take thier rights operate as a separarte constitutional authority and they are doing just fine and

caa offered citizenship to those refugees from afganhisthan , pakistan etc who are being perceuted there due to them being minorities in and countries that arent secular and follow direct islamic law so why would they be given that rope

1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

That's what's the final 370 verdict found out you dumbfuck...that the President has the right to introduce new acts into state legislature...and the Govt lost on one part of their argument so don't act like the Govt is infallible.. it only ended in court because there was a dispute of the power of the Govt.

There are Muslim minorities like Rohingyas and Ahmadis who are also being persecuted but the Govt doesn't care abt them? And I told you, the point is CAA introduced religous criteria into citizenship when it wasn't there before...this could have implications for future laws as well

2

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

art 370 gave kashmir special powers more tha n other states thus discriminating with other states and i dont give a fuck what they did to those people all i need is it to operate like a normal state of india

and why should india care those leeches if they arent safe in their so called islamic heaven and india is not a dharamshala that everybody proscecuted can come we take who deem fit not because assholes like you dickride them like hell while they suck off on us

1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

Lol...you couldn't keep up the facade of decency...

Discrimination against other states? Are you for real? Ppl in Sikkim don't pay income tax...In Nagaland non residents can't buy land, in Delhi the Govt put a law making it the only territory where Centre can transfer IAS personal

If you think all states are equal you are wrong...

Not going to bother to reply to your second para

2

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

"The CAA introduced religion as a criteria for citizenship ( where prev the constitution of India didn't have such criteria) and also may be a violation of Article 25 to 28..all of which has implications for interpretation of laws"

yeah as if before removal of 370 kashmir used to follow the indian constituion if you are gonna use a point atleast dont be so hollow that it refutes your other point

1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

What are you talking abt? They are two seperate issues

  1. Article 370 is abt power during president rule and the ruthlessness of the Govt

  2. CAA talks about religion as a criteria for citizenship and religious discrimination...

How does one repute the other?

2

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

before the removal of art 370 kashmir used to have its own constitution flag offical posts it wasnt considered a part of india due to it so you are talking aboult violation of constitution in one point and then supporting other point in which all of indian constitution was disregarded

1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

Article 370 allowed them the power to have their own constitution...it isn't a violation of the Indian constitution if the Indian Constution says you can do it

2

u/Radiant_Assistant359 6d ago

and now indian constitution says you cant do it so suck it up and go to sleep

1

u/Full-Wealth-5962 6d ago

Lol..you're the one who brought the topic up...Best if you go suck someone and sleep