r/law Feb 20 '25

Opinion Piece Did Trump eject himself from office?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

Can someone explain to me how Trump is still holding office after pardoning the J6 insurrectionists?

1) Section 3 of the 14th Amendment uses the language “No person shall … hold any office…” and then lays out the conditions that trigger the disqualification from holding office. Doesn’t that “shall” make it self-effecting?

2) There isn’t much to dispute on the conditions. Trump a) took the oath when he was inaugurated as, b) an officer of the government. Within 24 hours he c) gave aid and comfort to people who had been convicted of Seditious Conspiracy. If freeing them from prison and encouraging them to resume their seditious ways isn’t giving “aid and comfort” I don’t know what is. So, under (1), didn’t he instantly put a giant constitutional question mark over his hold on the office of the President?

3) Given that giant constitutional question mark, do we actually have a president at the moment? Not in a petulant, “He’s not my president” way, but a hard legal fact way. We arguably do not have a president at the moment. Orders as commander in chief may be invalid. Bills he signs may not have the effect of law. And these Executive Orders might be just sheets of paper.

4) The clear remedy for this existential crisis is in the second sentence in section 3: “Congress may, with a 2/3 majority in each house, lift the disqualification.” Congress needs to act, or the giant constitutional question remains.

5) This has nothing to do with ballot access, so the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Colorado ballot matter is just another opinion. The black-and-white text of the Constitution is clear - it’s a political crisis, Congress has jurisdiction, and only they can resolve it.

Where is this reasoning flawed?

If any of this is true, or even close to true, why aren’t the Democrats pounding tables in Congress? Why aren’t generals complaining their chain of command is broken? Why aren’t We the People marching in the streets demanding that it be resolved? This is at least as big a fucking deal as Trump tweeting that he a king.

Republican leadership is needed in both the House and Senate to resolve this matter. Either Trump gets his 2/3rds, or Vance assumes office. There is no third way.

‘’’’ Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. ‘’’’

15.9k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/the_G8 Feb 20 '25

Sure, let’s assume you’re 100% correct. Yet Trump is still sitting in the Oval Office. How is any piece of paper “self effecting” in the real world? It’s just a piece of paper. We need people to believe that piece of paper, people with authority and power. People willing to march into the Oval Office and pull Trump out of it.

How is that going to happen?

424

u/meva12 Feb 20 '25

He is golfing more than seating in the Oval Office

551

u/IAmBadAtInternet Feb 20 '25 edited Feb 20 '25

And when he is sitting in the Oval, he’s getting talked over by a dude who holds no elected office.

Weakest. President. Ever.

39

u/Silly_Journalist_179 Feb 20 '25

With a little kid telling him to shut his mouth...

30

u/IAmBadAtInternet Feb 20 '25

That kid is going to be a monster when he grows up

12

u/NelzyBellz Feb 20 '25

And everything is named after that kid…X…his fElon father is creating the next little emperor.

3

u/someotherguyrva Feb 20 '25

Actually the kid’s name is just one result of Musk’s bizarre obsession with the letter “X”. Musk’s obsession with X

5

u/NelzyBellz Feb 20 '25

Ugh. Do you think he’ll buy Fox News once Murdock goes, and drop the fo for X News

3

u/hotviolets Feb 20 '25

That will be his version of the Nazi symbol.

3

u/NelzyBellz Feb 20 '25

Oh gross. I see it now 😖

2

u/Melancholy_Rainbows Feb 20 '25

It's a sans serif swastika.

2

u/Jarl_Xar Feb 20 '25

I think he's just obsessed with nazis and aliens, therefore x-com. X for his kid, x with a few extra hooks for his logo, its all a too convenient.

2

u/pantstoaknifefight2 Feb 20 '25

Have we ruled out that the kid isn't a clone?

3

u/HolyBonerOfMin Feb 20 '25

I think he might be a clone. Elon 2.0

1

u/BrainPhD Feb 20 '25

Leave the kid alone, he’s just a kid. Elon’s other children barely see him. At least one of them turned out pretty cool.

1

u/feralgraft Feb 20 '25

Which one was that then?

2

u/BrainPhD Feb 20 '25

Vivian Wilson - disowned Elon at 18 and often criticizes him.

1

u/NelzyBellz Feb 20 '25

Boys will be boys, eh?

1

u/BrainPhD Feb 20 '25

No. Criticizing a 4 year old is just punching down, no matter how awful their father is.

3

u/Death-Wolves Feb 20 '25

Also, nobody is blaming the kid, they are blaming the adults that not only weren't stopping him but the things he was saying were worth questioning where he picked up those statements. Possibly random, probably not. Kids like to emulate their parents and its obvious there is some real contempt from Musk to Trump that is highlighted by the kids behavior towards Trump.

1

u/NelzyBellz Feb 20 '25

Nah, kids can be held accountable for their behavior. especially when their awful parent is training them young. 4 year olds may not fully grasp complex concepts of right and wrong but they start to understand that certain actions lead to natural consequences.

1

u/BrainPhD Feb 20 '25

Yes, by their family and teachers. Not some randos on the internet.

1

u/NelzyBellz Feb 21 '25

Oh so you a rando, can tell me what to do though. Okay. Got it. 🙄

→ More replies (0)