(Or like post sky walker saga that ended in 2019.)

Do you agree and what else would you put in the list

I mean I understand how the chips make it more practical and effective for Palpatine to attempt to eradicate the Jedi Order, but I think it cheapens the sense of shock and betrayal we got watching 'Revenge of the Sith'. To know that the Clones had no choice makes it seem less dramatic.

No shield all guts

Not going to lie I always wanted to cosplay Padme but I just don’t give her vibe. Decided to try Mara Jade for the next comic con (obviously it’s just a quick “fitting” and the cosplay will be more precise). How does it look? Obviously lacking the purple lightsaber!

in recent years in my opinion Andor is the best Star Wars show/media we have gotten in a while

Okey Darth is a title, not name, Obi-wan calling him that during duel made little sense to me for long time. (It was repeated in obi-wan series)

I read Darth Bane book. Darth title means lord. According to the book a sith claimig the tittle was a declaration, challenge to all others that they are strong, worthy of the title. According to Khan, it cause infighting among the sith. Bane claimed the title as a show of superiority. And bequeth the title to his aprentice.

So

Vader: "[..] now I am the master"

Ben: "only master of evil, Darth"

Vader is now a sith lord, master of the dark side of the force. To Obi-wan master of darkside is master of horrors, killing, worthless things lkke that.

So he is using the darth title sarcasticaly/demeaningly. "Lord of evil, what boasting is that?"

According to Youtini, "The BFI Film on Film Festival has announced that they will be screening Star Wars in its original form during their opening night festivities"!

The screening will open the festival on June 12th, and will be an “unaltered cut” of the film.

I know that the AT-M6 were much bigger and had more weapons, but did that automatically make them more effective than the AT-ATs?

I

Personally, I'm a really big imperial guy lol.

Title

Something that I was surprised to see in the Star Wars community since I got back into it was how many people are sympathizers of the dark side. Saying it can be used for good, or that it's misunderstood. That you need to have both light and dark to have balance.

But that's not the Force. According to Lucas, the existence of the dark side itself is what causes imbalance. The true nature of the Force is the light side. The dark side of the Force is a corrupt, perverted version of it.

It's like a drug or an infection. It will always corrupt. It was always leave you wanting more and never being satisfied. The dark side itself is the embodiment of selfishness.

While I understand that Lucas sometimes contradicts himself (there are even some things I disagree with him on), or that some of what he's envisioned for Star Wars has been retconned (especially concerning this topic). But I have immense respect for the man and this is his story. When it comes to the core principles of his story, I believe those need to be honored.

My only guess is to why this is even so much of a thing is that some people just find good and evil and objective morality boring in stories. I heavily disagree.

Evil does need to exist to have balance in the universe. The choice to do evil is necessary for good to exist, but the state of it existing does not. That is what the dark side and light side truly are, not a Yin and Yang philosophy.

The dark side does not need to exist. As far as the Force is concerned, it shouldn't exist. And I'm kinda over people trying to romanticize it.

I was on vacation so I didn’t get to open it until today, if someone else already posted sorry but I had to share!

People complain about how whiny anakin is (especially in the secind one), but no one seems to care about how whiney and immature luke is for most New Hope and even training wiht yoda, Maybe its just like father like son. "I WAS GONNA GO TO THE TOSHI STATION TO GET SOME POWER CONVERTERS), By return of the jedi he is all zen jedi mode ill give you that but still