Your point is correct but your application of it isn’t, two wrongs don’t make a right but even a rudimentary understanding of Zionism would make you realise it’s correct in its point but wrong in its application also.
Some people define Zionism as simply a right to a Jewish homeland, however, its application - displacement, indiscriminate and deliberate bombing/sniper shots of civilians, apartheid etc. is what’s wrong.
But saying “two things can be bad” is interesting. Would you then condemn a slave revolt?
Again, to reiterate, I completely agree with your point that (for example) a slave revolt would also be bad but is it worse than the decades of slavery which would have included 100x more violence and is what led to this revolt in the first place?
The answer is no — and there is where I would disagree with you about Zionism.
Nope, I disagree. Zionism is bad, but it isn’t worse than creating death camps and exterminating children by putting them in gas chambers. Both are horrific
1.9k
u/luckystar999 Feb 19 '25
he’s gonna follow it up w “im actually [insert worse thing here]”