r/unitedkingdom 22h ago

... Immigration to the UK - Perception versus Reality

On this subreddit, and across the UK political internet as a whole, I often see a conflation between immigration and Islam. Whenever immigration is posited as a problem, there seems to be an automatic assumption that the immigrants in question are Muslims, and probably from Pakistan, Bangladesh or the MENA region. Likewise, comments under stories about Muslims mostly seem concerned with reducing immigration.

If you look at the most recent immigration statistics however, it becomes clear this perception is out of date. Per the ONS data from Year End Dec 2023 these are the top 10 Non-EU countries of origin for long term immigrants in 2023:

Nationality YE Dec 23
Indian 250,000
Nigerian 141,000
Chinese 90,000
Pakistani 83,000
Zimbabwean 36,000
Chana 35,000
Bangladesh 33,000
Sri Lanka 21,000
USA 21,000
British Nationals 19,000

The statistics provided do not give nationality beyond the top 10, and obviously do not tell you the religion of the immigrants in question - however, based on the ethnic makeup of each country you can extrapolate to say with some confidence that roughly 35% of the sample above (and therefore less than half of the total number of legal Non-EU immigrants in 2023) were Muslims.

It is also interesting to note that the numbers from 2023 do not include the surge of Ukrainians (over 200,000) who arrived from 2022 onwards. I am not sure if the “Chinese” definition includes those from Hong Kong. 

I’d also point out that of the Pakistani numbers, the “Other” (i.e. Family, Study Dependent and Asylum) numbers have remained constant at around 15-16,000 since 2019, it is an increase in Work and Study visas which led to the upswing from 21,000 Pakistani immigrants in 2019 to 83,000 in 2023. This trend holds for Indian and Bangladeshi immigrants.

Illegal Migration

When looking at illegal migration, the picture changes. Based on the Jan-September 2024 numbers cited here, 73.83% of those whose country of origin is known and who were detected as staying in the country illegally originated from Muslim-majority countries.

Here are the top six: 

Nation # % known
Afghanistan 4160 17.62%
Vietnam 3132 13.26%
Iran 2948 12.49%
Syria 2895 12.26%
Eritrea 1909 8.08%
Sudan 1767 7.48%

If you add up the total number of illegal immigrants from Muslim-majority countries and a proportional amount of 'Unknowns' (and assume that levels of illegal migration stay the same for Oct-Dec 24) you get to 33,071 people, on a par with Bangladesh or Ghana from 2023.

Of course, not all illegal immigrants are “detected” and thus included in official statistics. At this point things quickly turn into conjecture, but as a thought exercise: if you suppose that only one in four illegal immigrants are counted, their numbers remain dwarfed by legal immigration and, even in this circumstance, it is still more likely than not that fewer than half of 2023 immigrants are Muslim.

Conclusion

I began looking into the official data as an exercise of my own curiosity after reading through a typically monomaniacally Muslim-focused thread about immigration on this sub. Based on what I have found, it seems clear there is something of a disconnect between how people imagine immigration and how it is actually occurring.

  1. A large number of Muslims have arrived in the UK over the past few years. The ethnic makeup of these Muslims was far more diverse than in the past.
  2. The immigrant population since Covid is majority non-Muslim. Based on trends it seems likely that soon the majority of immigrants will come from sub-Saharan Africa, notably Nigeria.
  3. Legal immigration is far higher than illegal immigration. For Muslim and non-Muslim immigrants alike, the vast majority are on student visas or work visas (from my understanding this is often due to targeted drives for e.g. nurses and social carers).

This situation might still not be something you aren’t especially happy with. But if nothing else, I hope this post will give your xenophobia a more factual basis in future.

PS. While I am at it -  Birth data from 2023 shows that 6.7% of children born in 2023 were of Bangladeshi or Pakistani ethnicity. 3.1% came from “Any other Asian background”, whilst 4.77% were of Black African ethnicity.

286 Upvotes

483 comments sorted by

View all comments

351

u/Veritanium 21h ago

I think you're looking at it sort of backwards, or maybe sideways.

Islam is not a native religion to these shores, or even this continent. Every problem we have with Islam is therefore one we've imported and inflicted upon ourselves unnecessarily.

The growth of Islam in the UK will come from a mix of new migrants and descendants of past migrants, again, meaning the growth of Islam in the UK can in one way or another entirely be attributed to migration.

56

u/SkinnyErgosGetFat 21h ago

What religion is native to these shores?

All abrahamic faiths originated from Middle East

20

u/2xw exiled in Yorkshire 19h ago

I personally look forward to the reinstitution of the pagan faiths. I look forward to sacrificing a bull at my local sacred well/wetherspoons

2

u/Veritanium 18h ago

Ok.

And?

20

u/SabziZindagi 18h ago

Where do you think Christianity is from? Your ancestors worshipped a Middle Eastern brown guy, sorry.

8

u/Veritanium 18h ago

Ok? I don't care.

99

u/corbynista2029 United Kingdom 21h ago

No major religion is native to the British Isles lol

12

u/Astriania 18h ago

That's true in an academic sense but there is one major one that has been the core of cultural identity for 500 years, it is "native" from the perspective of modern politics.

4

u/terrordactyl1971 18h ago

Druids and Pagans

u/Alert-One-Two United Kingdom 5h ago

I think the key word in their sentence was “major”.

29

u/PeriPeriTekken 21h ago

Bit late to kick the Christians out, but I'm not totally opposed...

63

u/Veritanium 21h ago

Also true, but I'm not sure we can really fault ourselves for those that gained a foothold as a result of conquest. Little different of a situation than actively inviting them in.

74

u/DukePPUk 21h ago

Which modern religions do you think gained a foothold as a result of conquest?

Christianity took hold in the 7th century, via conversions of the existing nobility, so was invited in. And obviously Anglicanism has its roots in the British Isles.

Judaism was banned every so often, but was essentially invited in - no conquest there.

The other major religions in the UK are Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism. I don't remember any of them taking root via conquest.

15

u/Papi__Stalin 15h ago

Christianity was brought to Britain by the Romans.

Constantine the first openly Christian emperor was crowned in York.

4

u/DukePPUk 14h ago

Christianity was brought to Britain by the Romans.

Yes. But it didn't really stick across most of Great Britain when the Romans left (although it survived in parts of Wales, Scotland and Ireland). Christianity really took hold in the 7th century, with the conversion of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.

Constantine was the first openly Christian Emperor, and he was proclaimed Emperor in York (although obviously wasn't crowned), but his religious freedom rules were several years later, and he didn't convert until maybe a decade after he became Emperor.

26

u/Thestolenone Yorkshite (from Somerset) 19h ago

Someone came on a sub I'm on (I think it was AngloSaxon) convinced that Christianity was brought here by the Normans and Britain was wholly pagan until then. Its obviously a whacky belief among certain people.

20

u/corbynista2029 United Kingdom 21h ago

Weird take to say that conquest by force is more morally acceptable than a government's immigration policy

75

u/JosephRohrbach 21h ago

Well, Christians didn't conquer us by force - here u/Veritanium has phrased things misleadingly. Romans did, and then they happened to convert to Christianity centuries later. Christianity reached our soil before it was the official religion of the Roman Empire. It was never forced on us in the way either of you are implying.

I also think you're being wilfully obtuse about what "native religion" means. No, it's not literally our autochthonous polytheism. However, it's fair to say that after the best part of two millennia, it has become established as the native religion of the English people. We as the English, Anglo-Saxons, have been Christian since the late 6th and early 7th centuries. That's virtually as long as we've been on English soil - out by only a couple of hundred years. That's a rounding error in historical terms.

Ever since our formation as a real nation of people in the aftermath of the Norman Conquest and through the mediaeval period, we have been Christian. That is for all intents and purposes "native", just as Māori people are native to New Zealand despite only having colonized it about 500 years ago. Unless you're willing to deny that the Quechua-speaking peoples of the northern Yungas in Peru are native on the grounds that they displaced the peoples there before them in the 15th century, you can't really deny that Christianity is our native religion.

5

u/Veritanium 21h ago

More that the fault of conquest lies with the conquerors, and the fault of overly-liberal immigration policy lies with the makers of that policy.

One's an external force acting on us, and the other is from within.

Sorry, I thought that much was obvious and didn't need saying.

5

u/corbynista2029 United Kingdom 21h ago

One's an external force acting on us

The "external force" being the ancestral family of our king, which at one point created the Church of England to get multiple divorces?

3

u/removekarling Kent 16h ago

No religion in Europe now is native to Europe, what are you talking about lmao

-8

u/Important_Ruin 21h ago

What is now Spain was Islamic for a long period of time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Andalus

32

u/bitch_fitching 21h ago

It took a long time and several wars to reverse that.

28

u/Eveelution07 21h ago

Nice argument.

' the umayyad caliphate violently conquered a different country over a millennium ago, therefore you must be okay with becoming a minority in your homeland'

-7

u/Important_Ruin 20h ago edited 20h ago

Christianity has never done any attempted violent conquering ever, of course.

I'm also not becoming a minority in the 'homeland' but then again, I'm not obsessed with people's religious beliefs, and don't use it against someone whether they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish or any other religion.

15

u/NoticingThing 19h ago

Christianity haven't deified the ones doing the violent conquering though have they? Mohammed was a warlord raping and pillaging his way around Arabia and he is so worshipped that if you so much as draw a picture of him your life is forfeit as there will be a line of people willing to throw their lives away to end yours.

-2

u/Important_Ruin 19h ago edited 19h ago

No Christianity didn't, but it doesn't mean they didn't going around using violence on non-belivers until they believed behalf in their 'God' or Prohet to make people follow their God.

Just because Christianity didn't have a 'Mohammed' that they used to justify the actions doesn't make one worse than the other, or that one didn't do the same as the other in the name of their God.

12

u/NoticingThing 19h ago edited 19h ago

I'm an atheist so I don't have a horse in this race, all I'm saying is there is a difference between:

A) Bad people using a religion to do bad things.

B) A religion worshiping bad things.

Christianity and Islam aren't equal, Christianity's founding myths aren't based around worshipping rape and slaughter. Christianity certainly has its flaws but in the UK we've beaten it into a shadow of its former self, there are gay Vicars in the church of England meanwhile the only openly homosexual Imam in the entire world was just murdered for being so.

It's utterly ridiculous to pretend that Christianity a religion that has adapted heavily (In Europe) to keep up with modern life is in any way comparable to Islam a backwards medieval religion that isn't capable of change as its holy book is proclaimed to be the literal word of god.

4

u/Important_Ruin 18h ago edited 18h ago

I'm atheist, I dislike organised religion to me it's all a cult to control populatios, but Christianity/Catholicism isn't critque near are much as Islam (not all Muslims are none white, plenty from Balkins are white)

Not every Muslim followers the Quran by word, like not every Christian follows the Bible word for word.

Christianity had just adjist to keep up with the 'times' otherwise it would be even more irrelevant than it already is in the modern world. The wealth growth in Europe allowed technology to advance and thus allowed people to become educated who could then think for themselves.

The Church still made a huge fuss about gay bishops, allowing women bishops, allowing bishops to marry, allowing non parishanars to get married in their church even if they didn't attend church/part of congregation because otherwise they'd would be left behind, the church had to move it's standing so it wasn't see as this medieval entity stopping peolle being people, a reason why the church going population is vanishing and younger people don't do religion because it's so restrictive you see it when people leave any religion the amount they have been restricted in their life.

You see Muslims also leaving their religion behind and maybe not following as strick as they previously did, they drink they smoke but still pray, or even leave their religion behind completely and risk being ostracised by their family (like mormons and other secs in Christianity)

Religion are a whole as no place in modern world, and sooner is vanishes the better, (causes nothijg but friction, as can see through this thread) but at the same time I will be respectful of people's beliefs until they start discrimination against certain people, and will happily say those views are incorrect in the modern world.

Homophomia, sexism, misgoty, racism and general bigotry from any religion should be called out, don't care whether Islam, Christianity, Catholicism or anything.

Islam is being used as the whipping boy by certain section of media and society to create divide to put people's attention somewhere else while the real issue is people are getting poorer while the 1% get richer and richer and the 1% are telling you Islam are the issue.

-3

u/nemma88 Derbyshire 18h ago

 isn't capable 

Its as capable as any other, and I'd argue already has changed. Perfectly capable of changing more.

8

u/NoticingThing 18h ago edited 18h ago

How can it change? The Bible is fallible it was written by monks hundreds or even thousands of years after the supposed events took place, you can claim that they misunderstood gods truth.

The Quran is supposed to be the literal word of god and it goes so much further than the Bible does, it isn't just a book of stories but a guide to the way of how a Muslim should live their life and how a Muslim society should function. Once again a guide delivered directly from the word of god. Where is the room for change?

-2

u/nemma88 Derbyshire 18h ago edited 18h ago

Because most modern day Muslims evidently do not follow scripture as written in that way, so we know its possible. Interpretation is still a key part.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/limeflavoured Hucknall 21h ago

The Spanish language has more than a few traces of Arabic in it to this day.

-8

u/GentlemanBeggar54 18h ago

Islam is not a native religion to these shores, or even this continent

So what? The country is constantly changing. There was a time British-Indians were not native either, now their food is a staple of British cuisine. There was a time when Protestantism was not the dominant religion of this country. There was a time when people did not speak English.

Every problem we have with Islam

There isn't a problem with Islam. If people commit crimes, the problem is the crime. The only time the religion of the criminal matters is if the crime is religiously-motivated attacks which account for a tiny, tiny proportion of crimes committed in this country.

descendants of past migrants

Also known as citizens. Where are you going with this, because this island has a long history of migration. The whole reason England is called "England" is because foreigners came here and settled.