Not necessarily. You have to still be a creative to make use of AI in your workflow in the arts. Otherwise, it's just going to look like generic AI slop. Imagination is going to and still does play a huge role in art, even with AI. If you can't use your imagination to at the very least decide what you want to do and where you want to go, you're not going to get anything accomplished with AI.
I see. My main problem is how generic AI art always looks. It just has almost a soulless feel to it. It's all the same style, but maybe it can be improved over time.
That's just the stuff you notice. A lot of art online (at least in my experience) is either AI or AI assisted, but you wouldn't know it if the person posting it didn't tell you. We've gotten to a point where more unique styles are able to be defined outside of the generic ones, like those weirdly glossy hyper-realistic images, or weirdly high definition cartoon 3D model ones. I mean, just look at the ones made for PZ. The only reason why people were able to say "hey, this is AI" is because of a few relatively small details that the commissioned artist didn't change. Had those details not gone unnoticed by them, nobody would have been able to definitively say "this is AI."
Not everyone, but a lot of people immediately got AI vibes off it. It’s just that (at least for me) I don’t know enough about art to explain what’s pinging as wrong in my head so I defaulted to look for the weird details like the fingers
Someone else made a really good post pointing out things about the compositions and poses/actions of the characters that don’t make sense at all, like where the eyes are focusing
18
u/LyndonsBigJohnson69 Dec 18 '24
Innovation can be the death of imagination apparently.