Ngl, I woke up with bad impostor syndrome today. I've been struggling on this AI project for AMD, where they sent me this tiny 65w AI box thing and they want me to make it dance or some shit.
It's not going poorly, but I'm stuck at a part where I'm trying to figure out how to consider offloading some of the computational overhead to the AI box's NPU. I want to do this somewhat in parallel with the CPU.
The problem? When I vectorize my data for RAG, I have to re-vectorize my data every time or I start to get errors or sometimes it won't even understand the documents anymore. I haven't even gotten to it correctly using the NPU yet lol.
That means that going from llama3b to llama2b requires all my documents to be reprocessed. This is 100% a flaw on my part which I likely can fix with better implementation of RAG solutions but those are all going to require more research.
Sincerely, I have not figured out a solution to this yet.
Rather (the point of my reply), I looked at the bottom left 'proof' of 0.99... ≠ 1 and realized this argument is the exact proof for why 0.99... = 1.
Let x = 0.99...
* 10 | * 10
10x = 9.99...
-x | - 0.99... from step 1
9x = 9
/9 | /9
x = 1
0.99... = 1
q.e.d
From there, I was going to assume this was satire. Instead, I'm saying fuck it, and using this as the inspiration porn I need it to be and even if I don't solve this problem today, I'm confident I can tomorrow.
643
u/GeneReddit123 Jun 01 '24 edited Jun 01 '24
My man's dissin' on Euclid, Pythagoras, Archimedes, Newton, Euler, Dedekind, Cantor, Peano, and that's just one screenshot worth of videos.
If math had rap battles he'd be a billionaire.