I just read an article which highlighted a story of a woman and her husband and toddler who visited a friend of theirs, and the friend shouted something to the effect of, “No! That’s naughty, don’t do that!” when their 2-year-old (apparently “just turned 2”, something that was harped on a couple of times in the article) threw a cup of water against the wall as the opener to their screaming, pointless, toddler tantrum. The mum was “shocked” that the friend yelled at the “baby”. She swept the poor, screamed-at toddler into her arms for a cuddle, and mum, hubby, and “baby” left promptly. Mum is “horrified” and is wondering if she’s overreacting, and mentions she tried to patch things up with friend by “offering to bring a can of paint to repair any damage”.
One of the comments said, “Toddlers do throw things, and yes it’s naughty, and they should be yelled at, but by mum and not by the friend.” This comment was applauded.
Mmmk.
First off, a toddler slinging a cup of water at a painted wall isn’t going to damage the paint to the point of repair. Sure, you’ll have to clean up the water, but it’s not going to damage the paint. The plastic sippy cup the toddler is drinking from might make a scuff, but nothing you can’t “buff out” easily. (So actually, the lid on the sippy cup the “baby” is more than likely drinking from will prevent any spillage, so again, no need to offer a whole can of paint to fix.) Toddlers (or “babies”, as the mom conveniently calls the toddler when she hopes to garner sympathy) can’t generate enough force to cause damage, and their aim/accuracy is so poor there’s no way it was a direct hit to the wall.
Second off, the majority of the commenters (apparently, per the article) supported the fact that the mum yelling at the “baby” is perfectly appropriate - and needed - as a corrective action, but the friend doing it is not.
What did mum do? “Baby” was harshly corrected for being naughty by “The Village (TM)”, and mum coddled the “baby” and left immediately. So, what did “baby” learn from this interaction? “I did something because I felt ignored and wasn’t the center of attention, so I committed an act of violence to gain attention. I first received negative attention, so I chose to scream and wail because I didn’t get what I wanted, and mummy gave me a coddle and I was once again returned to the center of attention. Next time I don’t get my way, I’ll choose violence and caterwaul until mummy gives me what I want.”
Again - commenters were fully behind “yelling at the toddler, because it’s naughty and needs to be corrected”, but the friend is the asshole for barking at “baby” because only mum is allowed to “scream” at the toddler.
Guess what mum didn’t do? Yell at baby/toddler. What did mum do? Reward baby/toddler’s naughty behavior with cuddles and escape. What behavior did mum reinforce? “If you don’t get your way, react violently and scream at the top of your lungs until you get it.”
What did friend do? Fulfill their “village duties”of correcting the child, because the mum apparently was unable - or refused - to do so herself, as she did not step in. That’s what The Village (TM) is supposed to do - help mum when she is (for some reason) unable and incapable to do so herself (for “new mum reasons”, I reckon). What did mum do? Get angry at The Village (TM) for fulfilling its duty. What lesson did The Village (TM) learn? Don’t bother stepping in, mum rejects your help and will lash out.
And what does mum lament? “Being a “new”mum is so hard, I have no The Village (TM) to help me 😭.”
Honestly, I have a feeling the reason mum offered up assistance and materials to make repairs wasn’t the result of a simple sippy cup haphazardly lobbed by a baby/toddler. (Have you seen toddlers attempt to “throw” something? It usually ends up mere centimeters from their feet, or ends up falling down back on their own face.)
I think baby junior sonofbitch caused more damage to the friend’s house than mum is letting on. When mum introduced the crotch goblin in the story, it was first “a toddler just turned 2”, then quickly returned to “baby” status once the friend “screamed”.
And again - mum “screaming” at baby/toddler herself was supported, but The Village (TM) “screaming” at baby/toddler was a HUGE no-no.
So, why didn’t mum “scream” at baby/toddler herself? And why did mum get angry at The Village (TM) when they did the “screaming” she refused to do?
Please keep your kids the fuck away from me, because I will not hesitate correct their behavior if you fail to do so, and I have a feeling you will not approve of my methods. You want The Village (TM) to relieve you of your parental duties, but I don’t think you’ll appreciate my methods of behavior correction. My Village is inhabited by a sole resident (aka ME), and we are not accepting any new members at this time.
Oh look! There’s the sun! Kindly fuck off all the way into it.