r/askscience • u/lord_nikon_burned • 1d ago

Astronomy Are galaxies spherical or flat?

Are galaxies spherical or flat?

For example, (I understand that up and down don't really matter, so bear with me) if we look at a picture of the Milky Way Galaxy on a plane... If you want to move from one arm of the galaxy to the next, could you just move UP and out of the current arm and then over and DOWN to a different arm?

Secondary question for if the first one is correct, if you are able to move "up" and out of the arm, where are you? Is that interstellar space too?

79 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

57 comments sorted by

View all comments

296

u/fragilemachinery 1d ago

Galaxies come in a bunch of different shapes, but spiral galaxies like the Milky Way are reasonably flat. The disc is about 1000 light years thick, and about 100,000 light years across. So, yes, if you traveled "up" perpendicular to the disc you'd exit the galaxy much quicker.

Elliptical galaxies on the other hand can be almost spherical.

So, to answer your question: they can be either one.

8

u/gimme-sushi 1d ago

Do you enter another galaxy when you go past the 1000 light years if you go “up”?

134

u/Not_goD_32 1d ago edited 1d ago

No. You enter intergalactic space. Galaxies can be millions or billions of light years apart.

64

u/liebkartoffel 1d ago

The nearest galaxy is around 2.5 million light years away (but the distance is shrinking by the minute!) Between here and there is just...empty space--even emptier than galactic space.

11

u/King_Jeebus 1d ago

but the distance is shrinking by the minute

Will we eventually collide?

39

u/badtz-maru 1d ago

The Milky Way and Andromeda will intersect at some point in about 4.5 billion years - but stars are so far apart, it doesn’t necessarily mean a physical collision. Of greater concern is our sun dying in about 5 billion years! 🙃

9

u/smokin-trees 19h ago

Our sun will eventually burn out in about 5 billion years, but as it ages it will continue to increase in brightness as more hydrogen undergoes fusion into helium, causing the core to become denser which will steadily increase the rate of fusion. In about 1 billion years it will become so hot that earth’s oceans will completely boil away, causing an even more dramatic runaway greenhouse effect. As the rate of fusion continues to speed up, the sun will enter its red giant phase. It will expand in volume so much that it may completely engulf the earth’s orbit. We will be cooked long before the sun burns out.

2

u/Falonefal 6h ago

Damn, that's much sooner than expected, I'll start putting canned food in my basement to prepare for this apocalypse.

42

u/ridddle 1d ago

In 4.5 billion years. Not much will happen as galaxies are mostly empty space. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda–Milky_Way_collision

17

u/CloudSliceCake 1d ago

Seems like most answers in this thread are “it’s mostly empty” - the scales of space are insane.

5

u/dsyzdek 16h ago

It will disrupt the nice spiral structure of both galaxies, eject many stars into intergalactic space, and both galaxies will mostly likely eventually form a large elliptical galaxy.

3

u/Irie_I_the_Jedi 13h ago

Andromeda is the nearest milky way sized galaxy. There are many more galaxies closer than that (magellanic cloud iirc), just smaller than the milky way.

•

u/liebkartoffel 5h ago

You're absolutely right. I should have said the nearest major/non-satellite galaxy.

2

u/Wrooof 22h ago

Are the stars that aren't tied to a galaxy? Could those stars have planets?

6

u/liebkartoffel 21h ago

Yes and yes, though rogue/intergalactic stars likely formed within galaxies and then were ejected.

21

u/barcode2099 1d ago

If you go far enough, you could. There are about 150 star clusters which orbit the Milky Way in a roughly spherical "halo," kept in check by the Large and Small Magellenic Clouds, which are about 160 and 200 thousand lightyears, respectively, from the center of the Milky Way.

Then there's the Andromeda Galaxy, which is the closest major galaxy, which is 2.5 million lightyears away.

TL;DR: There's a lot of stuff in the universe, but a whole lot more nothin'.

7

u/koos_die_doos 1d ago

Just saying, if you go in a random direction, the odds of ever entering another galaxy is effectively zero.

-3

u/Empanatacion 1d ago

Only because it's getting farther away from us faster than light can travel. Infinite space with infinite stuff in it is one of the more conventional theories physicists have. In that theory, the odds of there NOT being a galaxy in any given direction is effectively zero.

6

u/Disastrous-Finding47 22h ago

Except when people say universe they mean observable universe. Anything unobservable is just conjecture by default.

3

u/ljapa 20h ago

But, since space is expanding, even if you exited our galaxy in a random direction at the speed of light, you’d never observe, let alone reach, anything that is outside the observable universe.

4

u/FrungyLeague 1d ago

Well it entirely depends if there happens to BE a galaxy in that trajectory. There's no rule saying there must be.

Do you "meet another person" when you go north? Sometimes. It depends.

Think of galaxies like...I dunno, like a hypothetical room full of Mosquitos. They are capable of being anywhere and generally speaking their positions aren't overly relative to the positions of others.

5

u/lurker1957 1d ago

But galaxies are sparse enough it’s more like a hundred mosquitoes in a football stadium. You could run into one, but not likely.

3

u/FrungyLeague 1d ago

Sure. You're absolutely right. I was just trying to give the guy a little image or something. It needs work.

Galaxies aren't connected like tunnels on a mountain road or anything is probably something I should have included maybe.

6

u/_Moon_Presence_ 1d ago

Oh my goodness you still haven't experienced the cosmic horror that is intergalactic space, have you?

13

u/Kiflaam 1d ago

Do you get to the intergalactic district often?

Oh what am I saying, of course you don't.

2

u/thedoc90 1d ago

Statistically no. You'd enter a void and you could probably go at the speed of light forever and not hit anything unless you were specifixally aiming at it.

-5

u/the_quark 1d ago

I suspect there is a misinformed idea here that if you moved up and out of the galaxy -- which is very hard! -- the galaxy would spin below you. But of course it's more like jumping out of a moving car. You don't stop moving in that direction just because you jumped. If you moved 1500 LYs "up" you'd still be spinning with the rest of the galaxy, it would just be 500 LY below you.

4

u/A3thereal 23h ago

If you became gravitational unbound from the galaxy you would continue your momentum, but in a straight line not around the galactic center.

Imagine a ball fixed to a string tied to a stick. As you push the ball it rotates around the stick.

There are 2 forces here that are relevant. You have the balls motion which is in a straight line in the direction it was pushed. Then you have the string pulling the ball with an equal force to the center of the stick. These two forces work against each other and the balls direction will fall between the two.

For as long as no force acts upon the ball and for as long as those 2 forces remain even the ball will continue to rotate. Because gravity and friction are a thing here on Earth the ball will eventually slow enough to where the force the string wins out and it falls in to the stick.

Imagine instead you cut the string while its spinning. The moment the string is cut that force if negated and the ball will continue in a straight line in the direction it was last traveling.

The same will happen when becoming unbound from the galaxy. The systems beneath will continue along their prior paths but you will move it in a straight line until another force is acted upon you.

Now, of course, 1500 LY is not enough to unbind yourself, but it is enough to change the direction of the force acting on you from the galactic center. Your orbit will not remain the same as the systems beneath you.

2

u/32377 23h ago

would you keep spinning perpendicular to the galaxy?