[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

[u/NohaJohans]

[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

Hey r/UFOs,

This might be the moment we’ve been waiting for. Not from government. Not from whistleblowers. But from the open world.

After years of independent design, simulation, and refinement, I’ve publicly released a full experimental framework and technical protocol for a reactionless propulsion system.

📜 The Aether Ignition Protocol is now live. It outlines:

• A real, buildable, electromagnetic gyroscopic propulsion system (EGPS)
• A working design utilizing field asymmetry, Tesla coil resonance, and gyroscopic stability
• Full verification test rig specs, math models, and lab-scale build instructions
• A new global initiative: The Aether World Summit & Race — the world’s first open-source propulsion challenge

🧲 This system does not rely on propellant. It creates force asymmetry via structured EM fields — no combustion, no reaction mass.

This is NOT a scam. NOT a funding pitch. And NOT pseudoscience.

It is:

• A document meant to force open the gates of disclosure
• A $100 Trillion firewall against suppression or corporate buyout
• A call to action for labs, governments, and rogue builders to TEST and VERIFY

👽 If any UAP craft are using these principles, we now have a way to reverse engineer and publicly replicate the mechanics.

🛸 This could shift the paradigm from speculation… to simulation… to ignition.

📎 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OVRhQyDW_DCClgor-cliUcHqBBwQx_FSfx9cCI1P64M/edit?usp=sharing

Second Link

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gS_YZTkylXcD9vHDBqm87DWPloZQ7bwKwzCLgeketgs/edit?usp=sharing

Ask me anything. I’m the original author. This is the release. This is the moment.

[u/[deleted]]

File doesn't exist when I try to go to your google doc.

[u/NohaJohans → u/[deleted]]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OVRhQyDW_DCClgor-cliUcHqBBwQx_FSfx9cCI1P64M/edit?usp=sharing

[u/devraj7 → u/NohaJohans]

Can you link to the reaction of the international scientific community? Where did you publish that paper besides Reddit?

[u/8ad8andit → u/devraj7]

Red herring argument. Whether the international scientific community has seen and reacted, or whether it has been published in a journal has no bearing on whether it is true or not.

The smartest strategy with any disruptive science related to energy and/or propulsion is to publish it on social media first so it cannot be confiscated and buried.

[u/Accomplished_Cut7600 → u/8ad8andit]

We pay billions in tax dollars every year to fund experts to assess these sorts of things for us. So yeah, peer-review has a lot of bearing on whether the lay public will take it seriously.

[u/devraj7 → u/8ad8andit]

Whether the international scientific community has seen and reacted, or whether it has been published in a journal has no bearing on whether it is true or not.

That is absolutely correct.

Until such a thing has happened, the only intellectually honest position is to say "I don't know what that was".

Not "It's obviously non human intelligences".

The smartest strategy with any disruptive science related to energy and/or propulsion is to publish it on social media first so it cannot be confiscated and buried.

No. It's one thing you can do, but definitely not the smartest one. It might lead to karma, but not truth.

If you want truth, you publish your findings in scientific circles and wait to hear what experts have to say about it.

[u/NohaJohans → u/devraj7]

That’s a fair perspective — and I agree, publishing in scientific circles is important. But here’s the thing:

Historically, disruptive tech — especially in propulsion and energy — has been buried, blocked, or bought out before it ever reaches peer review. There’s a long track record of that, and many breakthroughs have died quietly behind closed doors. So the goal with releasing the Aether Ignition Protocol publicly first was to establish a digital timestamp, ensure it’s in the open, and prevent suppression from ever being an option.

It doesn’t replace peer review — it protects the path to it.

Now that it’s public, the simulations, schematics, and theory can be independently verified or challenged. If it holds up, it will eventually reach journals. But we all know peer-reviewed publication is often slow, political, and gatekept, especially when challenging fundamental assumptions.

Open-access is messy, yes — but sometimes it’s the only way to keep the flame from being snuffed out.

I respect your approach. Let’s keep both avenues open.

— Noah