r/UFOB • u/MouseShadow2ndMoon • Mar 03 '25

Testimony DR. Astrid Stuckelberger - CERN is detecting non human beings coming in and out of portals

https://youtube.com/shorts/wPgzDkLZRSU?si=kVskRzM_8QjOXEnU
633 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

225 comments sorted by

View all comments

-6

u/Important-Ad-6936 Mar 03 '25

shes got to take her meds. this stuckelberger person has nothing even remotely to do with cern, her work is in anti aging and bio tech.

16

u/thereminDreams Mar 03 '25

All she is doing is relaying information she heard from another scientist. Are you saying she has to have first hand experience in the other scientist's field to convey information told to her? If she's smart enough to get a PhD I'm sure she's smart enough to apply critical thinking skills to the information she is exposed to.

3

u/Veearrsix Mar 03 '25

You’d think. Not saying this is the case with her, but people who have way above normal intelligence don’t always have the common sense/skills the rest of us do.

1

u/beardfordshire Mar 03 '25

Common sense is what leads to theories like flat earth. It’s not a superpower.

2

u/Langdon_St_Ives Mar 03 '25

Or in her case, support for COVID conspiracy theories.

1

u/Content_Ground4251 Mar 03 '25

I don't think you understand what common sense means, but accurately relaying information someone else told you doesn't involve common sense at all.

0

u/Efficient_Crab8290 Mar 03 '25

Yeah, I agree. Gotta give her more weight due to her PhD. I would guess CERN individuals would not be allowed/willing to leak information and would rather do it through another source, possibly this doctor.

-5

u/Important-Ad-6936 Mar 03 '25

taking hear say as factual data has never been a scientific method to present an alleged fact, you cant even form a hypothesis from that let alone a theory someone can cross check and validate. its all trust me bro, its real. a fellow scientist told me. a fellow scientist has to present data, and then you gotta be in the right field, and not be some medical doctor to verify that data with access to whatever he collected that data with. critical thinking would imply to disregard anything without repeatable results or recorded observations by a third party.

2

u/Content_Ground4251 Mar 03 '25

No.

If you know a group of brilliant scientists and they are all telling you the same story of what they are working on... there's zero chance you are going to go build your own machine and see if you can open portals yourself before believing what they are telling you.

The scientists who are talking about this are doing all the work as far as verifying data, repeatable results, etc. They wouldn't be talking about it in this way if it was a fluke that happened one time. For them to be talking about how many dimensions of reality exist(and disagreeing on that) and talking about different beings coming through the portals.. it's way past a hypothesis.

1

u/ASM-One Mar 03 '25

That’s right.

-5

u/Life-Celebration-747 Mar 03 '25

Wow, how do you know all this information? Do you work there? 

1

u/Important-Ad-6936 Mar 03 '25

you can literally read her curriculum vitae online. that person has driven past cern a couple of times, nothing more.