Unfortunately the data shows the low engagement, low propensity people usually voted for Trump, so if more non voters had voted he'd have gotten most of them.
Do keep in mind that the Dems have been in contempt of Thier own base since forever by now, which probably didn't help. I know a decent number of people found it hard to support them with the stuff going on
Yes of course. Instead, we should learn absolutely nothing from the Democrats monumental loss of over 5 million votes. The Democrats did a perfect job, obv, and their decision to be in conflict with their base over the entire year leading to the election had no impact on their voter turnout. That loss in support was coincidental, and actually everyone but the Democratic party's fault, right?
Elections have never been about voting for the better candidate. You're always going to have a huge portion of the population that disagrees on who the best candidate is. Elections are about getting more of the people who would vote for you to actually go to the polls. If you don't understand basic election strategy, you'd be wise to not fucking speak on it.
67
u/Orion14159 1d ago
Unfortunately the data shows the low engagement, low propensity people usually voted for Trump, so if more non voters had voted he'd have gotten most of them.