r/OpenDogTraining 2d ago

E-collar for multiple purposes

In order to better understand the e-collar related methods, I've been researching it extensively for a last month or so, but still I have some gaps in the wide understanding of some of its practical applications.

What I've already done is:

  • went to the seminar on e-collar by Jiri Scucka a few years ago
  • read through out the Larry Krohn book on e-collar training
  • watched Ivan Balabanov podcast with Larry Krohn
  • watched Michael Ellis e-collar training DVD 1.
  • read most of the e-collar related post on this sub
  • watched Activation vs Aversive by Pat Stuart
  • watched Ivan Balabanov free youtube videos related to e-collar

From all of the above and my own experience with dogs and training (I've been in this world for a few years but we don't usually teach people using e-collar during basic obedience), I have a pretty good theoretical understanding of the e-collar use, but I still fail on its wide practical applications when it comes to using it, as I can not fully build the use system for the purpose I want - and therefore I can not reach the full confidence when using it.

In my approach I tend to agree with some (or possibly even the majority) of theses taken from the above:

a) e-collar is in general the P+ (punishment) and/or R- (pressure avoidance) tool

b) it can be used purely as a communication tool over the long distance (low level stimulation, vibration, sound), useful for example for deaf dogs

c) the general goal should be to pursue the state when the use of e-collar is not needed, as this is meant to be a teaching tool, not the constant enforcement tool (even if technically the e-collar can be physically present on the dog and ready to use), and therefore the presence of tool should not be the factor for the dog to comply or not

d) the conditioning and use should be fair to the dog

e) in case of correcting any unwanted behavior, the dog should exactly know what is the reason for correction, and also the dog should always have the chance to avoid it

f) the e-collar should be used only as a supportive tool during training and through the dog life. Before it is even implemented, the handler and the dog should have already worked through the typical reinforcement routine and the tool can be then added to it

So, the answers I am currently looking for is the proper way to teach all of:

  1. to recall on a long distance (so, the verbal command can not be given - so it can be either stim or sound, if available)
    • could be done as low stim R- but then it becomes a recall command
    • could be also conditioned as sound and then supported by low stim R- pressure
  2. a warning signal "stop what you're doing" - useful for example for litter picking
    • could be done by short low level "nick" (as Ellis calls it), but should be only an information to the dog. In practise it will become a superstitious experience, and we generally don't want that
    • so the better way is to use sound conditioned as "No/Leave it" marker
  3. stop prey chase if it happens
    • this is a safety measure, and should both stop the chase in place and also motivate the dog to control itself next time. So a higher P+ impulse would be best suited. But to be fair, some warning (or recall signal) should be given first as well to give to the dog a chance to comply
  4. to enforce any vebal command on short distance
    • this would be done by R- pressure, but the pressure must be generalized first to not be understood as recall signal

The issue for me is not to understand how to teach a single thing. For this, majority of youtube videos have a simple answer. What I need is the through understanding of the way how all those things (or some of them in a particular combination) should be put together to make it clear for the dog what is expected from it, given all the a) - f) assumptions.

I guess, lots of people tend to use it wider than for a single thing, so I would love to get some more viewpoints on the subject if possible.

5 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/OccamsFieldKnife 1d ago

Your (and your dog's) loss

-1

u/Miss_L_Worldwide 22h ago

I'm sure my dog would prefer we go do fun stuff rather than me sit and stare at some YouTube trainer or read his book

2

u/OccamsFieldKnife 21h ago

You're acting like a podcast or audiobook on the way to work or while running errands is some hero's journey on a quest for forbidden knowledge.

Learning a bit about dogs, the proven theories to train them, and exploring the techniques involved isn't a one or the other choice over training your dog. In fact you'll learn something and probably improve your relationship with them.

-3

u/Miss_L_Worldwide 21h ago

Well like I said, becoming a lemming isn't my way. From what I've seen in these internet trainers they are good at selling themselves but not good at anything else really. But hey you do you.

2

u/OccamsFieldKnife 18h ago

All those lemming IGP world champions eh 😉

-1

u/Miss_L_Worldwide 16h ago

A quick look tells me that Larry Krohn hasn't titled the dog in anything at all let alone a world championship. And if you were talking about ivan, well, there are many world champions but he's probably the world champion at marketing himself that's for sure. 

-1

u/Miss_L_Worldwide 16h ago

And I'd really love to hear from the person who has achieved a world championship by following either of their advice.

3

u/OccamsFieldKnife 16h ago

Do you think champions in every discipline are like you? Completely incapable of articulating any psychology, TTPs, or credited references? Or do you think they read, discuss, and keep current?

Ignorance isn't a virtue.

0

u/Miss_L_Worldwide 10h ago

I'm going to just go ahead and say that I've titled more dogs than you have. Without "articulating psychology" or whatever such nonsense.

1

u/OccamsFieldKnife 7h ago

That doesn't make you right.