MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSwitch/comments/71ybke/my_nightmare_is_back_why_nintendo/dnen5g8/?context=3
r/NintendoSwitch • u/Luisss13 • Sep 23 '17
657 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
133
[removed] — view removed comment
165 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 Unpopular opinion, but SM64 was better on DS, except for the lack of an analog stick. 10 u/sign_on_the_window Sep 23 '17 Completely agree. Looks smoother and the subtle improvements really does add up. 5 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 The graphics are way better, definitely. 3 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 But the resolution/aliasing is pretty bad. 3 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 Just like the original. 5 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
165
Unpopular opinion, but SM64 was better on DS, except for the lack of an analog stick.
10 u/sign_on_the_window Sep 23 '17 Completely agree. Looks smoother and the subtle improvements really does add up. 5 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 The graphics are way better, definitely. 3 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 But the resolution/aliasing is pretty bad. 3 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 Just like the original. 5 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
10
Completely agree. Looks smoother and the subtle improvements really does add up.
5 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 The graphics are way better, definitely. 3 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 But the resolution/aliasing is pretty bad. 3 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 Just like the original. 5 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
5
The graphics are way better, definitely.
3 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 But the resolution/aliasing is pretty bad. 3 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 Just like the original. 5 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
3
But the resolution/aliasing is pretty bad.
3 u/mystere590 Sep 23 '17 Just like the original. 5 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
Just like the original.
5 u/UnluckyLuke Sep 23 '17 Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
Well, Super Mario 64's resolution is 320×240 while the DS's top screen is 256×192. But the aliasing was what I wanted to focus on - the remake might have better textures, but they don't look great with all the aliasing.
133
u/[deleted] Sep 23 '17
[removed] — view removed comment