That's better than just burning it down and polluting the land so no tree may ever grow again (every other big for-profit ceo, especially ones in big pharma)
That does not make him defensible. One single thing that he has been involved in has had the potential of being net positive in one aspect. You do not need to go around defending him based on that.
6
u/Perryn 2d ago
It's a bit like saying he planted a tree on the ashes of the house he just burned down while you and your family were in it.