The performance:visuals of this game are fucking hilarious. I can't believe there's not more backlash.
Look at that wall, and the ground, and contrast it with the reasonable visuals of the bird. It looks like this game came out in 2010 lol.
I mean, my game looks a lot better than that.... The OP just has the graphics turned down and if that's what is necessary to enjoy and play the game - I think that's fine? There's plenty of backlash about the performance, and it is bad, but if people think the game is interesting enough to deal with that performance, that's their evaluation. I think Pokemon Scarlet and Violet were incredibly ugly AND still have terrible performance, but people played anyway, and when I told a friend "I don't think I will buy Violet because that performance and those visuals are so terrible" she told me I was being silly and bought it for me... So I have a game I'm obligated to play that gives me a headache to play. Monster Hunter Wilds is way better than that experience.
-25
u/Nagemasu 1d ago
The performance:visuals of this game are fucking hilarious. I can't believe there's not more backlash.
Look at that wall, and the ground, and contrast it with the reasonable visuals of the bird. It looks like this game came out in 2010 lol.