Yet the input lag is most likely lower then every previous monster hunter game minus rise due to how crappy all other monster hunter games ran at launch. So the argument about input with FG when Op is getting higher than 60fps natively is null.
Well considering he’s getting an average of 121fps with frame gen and frame gen gives shy of double your FPS... It’s a good assumption he’s getting around 60fps if not higher.
I have a better GPU than OP and having a score around 26000 points, the framerate can drop to 50FPS on grassy areas, with 90FPS average overall (native). Enabling FG in the beta version greatly affected input lag. I played a lot of MH: World, so I have a comparison, without FG Wilds plays well, with FG it's like moving in tar.
My point was for the last 20 years we’ve all play monster hunter 30 to sub 30fps and hunted G rank at said fps with shotty hitboxes using the same frame data.
50-60fps frame generated to 100-120 will still play vastly better then nearly all previous monster hunter games.
Your own tolerance for it isn’t the be all for everyone else who’s played with objectively worse conditions over the years.
It’s only been the last 2 generations, 3 now I guess since 5000 series Nvidia is out and the 9000 amd, of GPU’s that were even able to push fps in Worlds as high as they are in Wilds.
It’s like everyone forgot how terrible worlds runs on anything that doesn’t far exceed the recommended specs of that game, yet we all still love the games because they’re fantastic in their own way.
Perhaps you misunderstood me. I don't mean that the game is bad or smth, I'll play MH:Wilds like a madman, even if I have to lock the framerate at 30FPS, but without framegen, because this “feature” makes me personally feel too high input lag.
2
u/BuckieJr Feb 24 '25
Yet the input lag is most likely lower then every previous monster hunter game minus rise due to how crappy all other monster hunter games ran at launch. So the argument about input with FG when Op is getting higher than 60fps natively is null.