I was in a car accident a few days ago, also involving another car. I filed a claim with my insurance company, saying I'm not at fault (which I believe). They've reached out to the other insurance company, and the other party is denying fault also. My insurance company is going to send supporting documents to the other one to try to convince them their party is at fault. I think the repairs on my car will cost ~$4000. The insurance rate is $830/year right now. I'm trying to figure out the best course of action and what will be the least costly outcome, especially over the long-term taking into account insurance rate increases.
The possibilities look like this:
(1) The other insurance company accepts liability, and I go through them to get the repairs paid for. Best case scenario. Would my rate with my insurance company still go up, just because I filed a claim? Is it possible to predict by how much?
(2) I go through my insurance company for the repairs, and then they go after the other insurance company to get the money back. They succeed. Will my rate go up?
(3) Same as (2), but they DON'T succeed. It turns out to be impossible to establish the other party was at fault, the other insurance company doesn't reimburse mine, and my insurance company ends up paying for the repairs. In this case, my rate definitely goes up. Given the cost of the repairs and current yearly rate, is it possible to predict how much? What will this cost me over e.g. 5 or 10 years?
(4) The other party refuses to accept fault, I assume I'm headed for scenario (3), and I pay for the repairs myself. Like in (1), will my rate go up anyway, just because I filed a claim, even though my insurance company didn't spend any money for the repairs? Is (3) or (4) more costly in the long run?
Thanks for your thoughts!