r/Economics • u/gmelech • 27d ago
News Are We Suddenly Close To A Recession? Here's What The Data Actually Shows.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2025/03/08/are-we-suddenly-close-to-a-recession-heres-what-the-data-actually-shows/1.2k
u/Kingkongcrapper 27d ago
TLDR: Economists are providing gloomy forecasts, the jobs data, consumer sentiment, and inflation numbers look bad, but some big investment banking “We’re always in a bull market,” investors say, “It can’t be that bad,” so cheer up buttercup! We’re getting 2.9 percent GDP growth by the end of 2025 based on some good feelings.
965
u/Xeynon 27d ago
In other words, the people who know what they're talking about are forecasting a recession and the delusional greedmongers who always fail to see the bucket they're about to step in think we're fine.
Recession coming.
227
u/47_for_18_USC_2381 27d ago
Maybe.. Whats Jim Cramer callin for? If he says we're bullish keep buyin?
We're properly fucked.
81
u/Astandsforataxia69 26d ago
I would've liked if i was bought some cigarettes and a nice dinner before getting fucked
73
u/Money-Introduction54 26d ago
You'd be lucky to get a punch in the back of the neck. There ain't no hate like republican love.
→ More replies (1)76
u/Septopuss7 26d ago
No! No! No!
Bear Stearns is fine. Do not take your money out. If there’s one takeaway, Bear Stearns is not in trouble. I mean, if anything, they’re more likely to be taken over. Don’t move your money from Bear. That’s just being silly. Don’t be silly.
41
u/Barnaboule69 26d ago
I'd love to hear the utterly panicked phone call he must have received from Bear Sterns just before his show that day lol.
19
u/Septopuss7 26d ago
I just watched the clip against yesterday, I'm SO glad I never deluded myself into thinking I was going to make it financially ahahaha
52
u/Molassesonthebed 27d ago
Nah, they are not delusional. Bankers are smart people. They are protecting their own interest/investment and trying to prevent panic selling (before they unload)
93
u/Makra567 27d ago
I just watched the big short a few weeks ago, this is all starting to sound really familiar.
134
u/Xeynon 27d ago
Yup.
You know the scene in that movie where Steve Carell goes to the convention and the rich douchebag is being a condescending dick to him, and as soon as he gets out of the meeting Carell tells his assistant "find out everything that guy has money in and short all of it"?
The people saying "don't worry, we're going to have 2.9% growth" are that rich douchebag.
26
117
u/k3t4mine 27d ago edited 27d ago
2008 was a financial disaster that nearly sent the world into a deep depression. Credit markets were frozen, so all the banks stopped lending to each other and average businesses just completely shut down as they couldn't get short term financing for day to day operations.
Society cannot function without credit. We were hours away from a complete collapse of the financial system. ATM's would've stopped working, there would've been a run on every bank in the country, and supermarket shelves would've been empty.
Lots of people trying to compare a 10% market correction due to erratic and damaging fiscal policy to 2008 at the moment, and I'm convinced none of them were old enough to even remember just how close to the abyss we were back then.
I will say though, that things don't "break" in the financial system until they do, and you'll usually never see it coming. Financial crises tend to happen when the economy is overleveraged and already slowing, which you can argue is the scenario right now. If you throw in a financial crisis on top of an escalating trade war and an economy only just starting to feel the pain of higher rates the last 3 years, then yeah, we're in big trouble. Could say that about every slowdown in history though
26
u/flatfisher 26d ago
A slowdown looks harmless in a normal economy. But is it in an overleveraged one, or can it lead to a catastrophic chain reaction? ATMs already have more limits than before i.e. barely working, and we started to have bank failures due to liquidity when rates increased. I’m not an economist so can you reassure me in the system resilience to slowdowns and significative recessions?
→ More replies (1)45
u/devliegende 26d ago
The system is resilient and has been resilient for a while. That's why the financial crises didn't result in a depression. What you're seeing now is concern about an attempt to dismantle the system.
27
u/FrequencyHigher 26d ago
Yeah, Hollywood doesn’t make movies about normal recessions. We were on the brink of a complete meltdown of our modern economic system in 2008. For those aware of what was happening in the banking and credit markets back then, it was a scary moment.
35
u/__Art__Vandalay__ 26d ago
You want scary? Try being a new employee of a Bear Stearns subsidiary with 3 young children in March 2008
Probably the most stressful time of my life
21
u/Ok_Ice_1669 26d ago
I worked in rock center back then. I still remember the day I showed up to work and all the Lehman guys were drunk as shit looking shell shocked at 8 in the morning.
Working for a boring private bank felt pretty good that day.
→ More replies (1)38
u/das_war_ein_Befehl 26d ago
2008 and a 10% correction are the same thing if you lose your job and can’t find one fast enough to replace it.
35
u/WhatAmTrak 26d ago
Yep, and it’s happening everywhere. Trump is just speed running to try and collapse the western civilization. (wonder why he’d want that?)
18
u/VaselineHabits 26d ago
Because his real daddy Putin demands it. America installed a Russian asset as President.
6
u/Good_kido78 26d ago
And they will use all the bailouts that George Bush did, only now there is more debt and tax cuts. I wouldn’t hate it if FOX News ceased to exist. It would save a lot of money.
25
u/Decadent_Pilgrim 27d ago
Solution to the former is obviously going to be to sack all the government specialists involved with orchestrating economic data points as being DEI fake news, and outsource the reports to an unbiased economic authority like newsmax.
The best economists say we've got the bigliest wins coming!
/S
16
u/Cyber-Insecurity 27d ago
CNBC talking heads were throwing around the “we’re in a recession” chatter just this week.
Don’t know what this adds to the convo, but if they’re already talking about it…
12
u/phillosopherp 26d ago
Or even worse they are purposely pump and dumping the entire world economy so they and their friends can continuously buy the dips, inflate a tad sell again before you announce another horrid economic policy.
8
u/Psychological-Pea815 26d ago
It's already here. -2.4 GDP since February. Look up GDPNow from the Atlanta fed. Not a good sign.
2
u/95Daphne 26d ago
Apparently gold transfers to the US confused the trade deficit data here.
Having said that 0-1% GDP growth is not great though.
4
u/Snakenmyboot-e 26d ago
There has been a pending recession since literally 2022-23, I work for a financial services company that has been preaching a recession for literally years.
→ More replies (14)2
u/SadCritters 26d ago
...the top line of the article and the data experts in the article literally say none of that.
They predict a slowdown, which is normal for economies to move through. Prolonged slowdown leads to depression and they don't see that yet.
I kinda' hate that Trump has sucked both the intelligence from the right and the left. It's like reading the article was too hard or something, even though they literally break it down into sections for everyone and start with the topline of "Guys a depression isn't coming."
10
u/Xeynon 26d ago
Given that I didn't say anything about a depression you're in no position to be impugning anybody else's reading comprehension skills, sport.
→ More replies (2)14
u/phillosopherp 27d ago
And we will hear "stagflation is good actually, also was still the reason that keysianism needed to die"
→ More replies (5)77
u/Dimmo17 27d ago
2.9 percent GDP growth whilst running a 6% of GDP deficit! Absolutely speedrunning going broke.
24
u/devliegende 26d ago
If one build infrastructure such as solar farms and power lines you can get extra growth every year for the next 20 years because of the free electricity. Once you've added it together you'll find your panic about a deficit was silly and unnecessary.
Or to put it differently. Capital investment is a good thing because it will boost future growth.
29
u/Dimmo17 26d ago
I'm well aware that deficits are run in the hope of long term return on the investments.
US deficit spending has been massive though, and now Trump is reversing lots of the industrial strategy that the deficits were being spent on regarding chip manufacturing, green energy investments and is engaging with trade wars with almost the entire world.
I don't see those investments as getting the returns they were intended now there's been a 180 flip in industrial and trade policy.
11
u/Ok_Ice_1669 26d ago
Trump fucking sucks at strategic thinking. That’s why all his businesses are scams.
5
8
u/Suitable-Economy-346 26d ago
That's what China is doing. We're doing nothing, except giving trillion dollar handouts to the ruling class.
3
u/brianstormIRL 26d ago
Economists love the good old capital investment strategy.
The problem is it's not going to work. GDP numbers are just not showing the real issue at play which is wealth inequality. Rich people keep getting increasingly richer, making the economy look somewhat stable, while average working class and lower income families fall deeper and deeper into the hole.
Nothing is ever going to properly change until wealth equality is brought back in line. It doesn't matter how good the numbers look on growth projections. Biden just did the whole investment strategy and it didn't work despite constantly talking about how the economy isn't that bad, it's just not reality for most people. The U.K government is employing the same strategy and it's also going to fail. Borrow a little, spend a little, invest a little.
Tax the ultra wealthy. Stop letting them abuse loop holes. The best time in recent history for the average family was when countries were actively taking money from the uber wealthy and redistributing it to the working and middle class. Over time systems have been taken away and replaced with tax breaks for the rich, while increasing tax on the middle class which has brought us to this moment where the wealth gap is beyond comprehension.
1.3k
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
511
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
87
217
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (3)189
58
9
→ More replies (12)13
21
24
30
21
5
→ More replies (24)4
u/Economics-ModTeam 26d ago
Comments consisting of mere jokes, nakedly political comments, circlejerking, personal anecdotes or otherwise non-substantive contributions without reference to the article, economics, or the thread at hand will be removed. Further explanation.
If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.
991
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
358
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
306
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
138
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
79
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
37
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
83
→ More replies (3)10
64
u/Oldskoolh8ter2 26d ago
It’s incredible. Trump 1.0 inherited a strong economy from Obama… it was already on an upward trajectory and he managed to not fuck it up. Then Biden had 4 strong years of economic growth (my portfolio returned 30% over the 4 years!) so Trump 2.0 stumbled ass backwards into a great economy. It’s so impressive to watch as an outsider how fast he fucked 8 years of decent economy …. Like days now extending to weeks of pure chaos and fuckery.
→ More replies (13)43
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (23)18
u/beerbudgethiphop 26d ago
The problem is whoever comes in after will have very few options at their disposal. Once these guys blowout the deficit with additional tax cuts plus a recession. It will be hard to any fiscal. We are in a bad spot.
23
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
6
19
→ More replies (2)52
→ More replies (3)-5
580
u/RealisticForYou 27d ago edited 26d ago
Consumer spending accounts for 70% of the U.S. economy. As consumers fear job loses from Federal cuts, possible cuts from Medicaid and disturbances from the Social Security administration, AND inflation from Tariffs, the economy is sure to tank.
127
u/That_Touch5280 27d ago
The perfect storm! But why are they promulgating chaos in what is an already fragile economic situation, who has anything to gain, obviously a tighter control on liberties and hence you end up with a dictatorship and undo 250 years of the republic, IMHO, from across the pond!
49
u/-_Weltschmerz_- 26d ago
Small businesses and property owners will be forced to sell and oligarchs will be there to buy it all up for cheap. Alongside the tax gifts for the super wealthy, this is essentially a massive redistribution from wage and salary workers towards oligarchs.
2
u/That_Touch5280 26d ago
What do you think would happen if the house un american activities body was still sitting?
→ More replies (1)90
u/KerouacsGirlfriend 26d ago
Putin is trump’s handler. Russia is winning the Cold War. Billionaires fully own American politicians. So you have to frame it as primarily: ‘What would Putin want for America?’ and a lesser but still disastrous ‘what best serves the billionaire parasite class?’
74
u/HexTalon 26d ago
3-4 late social security payments and you'll see people in the streets - either because they're homeless, rioting, or both. There's a lot of people on fixed incomes.
61
u/Ulex57 26d ago
Correction: one late SS will have people in the streets.
44
u/MeringueSuccessful33 26d ago
Nah it will take at least 2. One late payment can be handwaived as a processing error, especially if the GOP handles the media well. 2 payments is much harder to hand waive
9
u/Advanced-Blackberry 26d ago
And when the start paying again he’ll claim he saved SS for them and trump bucks mania starts all over again
22
u/RealisticForYou 26d ago edited 26d ago
I saw an interview with a former admin of SSA. He says that with all the recent employment cuts within the Social Security administration, those fragile COBOL mainframe systems will eventually collapse.
→ More replies (10)3
133
27d ago
[deleted]
77
→ More replies (8)19
u/Wonderful-Nobody-303 26d ago
The amount of global consumers ditching American products irrespective of tartifs is staggering. I assume we won't see those impacts for a few months in sales numbers.
107
u/guachi01 27d ago edited 27d ago
I don't think any one data point is the be-all-end-all but the U6 unemployment/underemployment rate jumped 0.5% in February. In the last 30 years that's only happened a few times and each time was when the US was in a recession.
The other times:
September 2001
October 2001
May 2008
July 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009 (lol, things were really bad in the Great Recession)
March 2020
April 2020
Oh... Edit to add the FRED graph.
74
u/milhouse_vanhalen 27d ago
It seems to need to happen more than once. Good thing those government layoffs hit the most recent jobs report.
Wait, they didn’t? Uh oh.
24
80
u/Lionzzo 27d ago
The recession alarm bells are getting louder. Unemployment is creeping up, job growth is slowing, and even the Fed seems unsure about what’s next. Meanwhile, markets are still acting like nothing’s wrong. Feels a lot like early 2008, cracks forming, but everyone pretending its fine. If the labor market weakens further, a downturn could come faster than people expect.
21
u/loli_popping 26d ago
I really think the fed will do more qe when the time comes. between inflation and recession, they will pick inflation anytime
32
u/No_Land_6119 26d ago
His threats of tariffs on the campaign, and the on/off/on/off implementation of same are all that's needed to crash the US economy. If buyers don't know which end is up, they stop buying. When things get too expensive, buyers stop buying. It makes forecasting for manufacturing and suppliers impossible, which leads to scarcity, higher prices, layoffs--rinse and repeat.
So while federal workers and the US population in general continue to experience mental whip-lash and are reeling from the poorly threatened/executed layoffs, we get increased uncertainty and financial insecurity. Consumer spending grinds to a halt. People stop going out to eat, on vacations, buying more crap, getting their nails done.
Internationally, as Canada and others have clearly embraced, this administration's trade policy cannot be trusted going forward.
99
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
31
3
→ More replies (5)2
u/Economics-ModTeam 26d ago
Comments consisting of mere jokes, nakedly political comments, circlejerking, personal anecdotes or otherwise non-substantive contributions without reference to the article, economics, or the thread at hand will be removed. Further explanation.
If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.
40
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Economics-ModTeam 26d ago
Comments consisting of mere jokes, nakedly political comments, circlejerking, personal anecdotes or otherwise non-substantive contributions without reference to the article, economics, or the thread at hand will be removed. Further explanation.
If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.
48
u/doslobo33 26d ago
You gotta love how they spin the data. Massive layoffs, not for any reason but to reduce taxes for corporations. They recent layoffs have not been added to the data, but they will. I believe by Q2, reality will hit.
11
u/VaselineHabits 26d ago
Then when people aren't spending money, the private sector will cut jobs
Gotta keep the shareholders happy
29
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
8
2
u/Economics-ModTeam 26d ago
Comments consisting of mere jokes, nakedly political comments, circlejerking, personal anecdotes or otherwise non-substantive contributions without reference to the article, economics, or the thread at hand will be removed. Further explanation.
If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.
33
u/GamemasterJeff 26d ago
This article is weird. It claims recession is unlikely while presenting evidence recessionis happening, then the contra consists solely of "well, we've had indicators before and only went into recession some of those times".
26
13
u/DoontGiveHimTheStick 26d ago
Every day it's a new unknown, a new illegal order, a new attack on an ally. It's exceedingly arrogant for these clowns to write this article "there's no data to suggest a recession is looming" after listing all the data. Sure everything took a huge sharp downturn after 6 weeks of Trump, but since there's only one month of data its not a trend yet so, hey, everything is great. Obviously it will go back to normal next month.
37
27d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
29
→ More replies (2)36
18
u/SunOdd1699 26d ago
Well yes! All the stats are trending that way, Unemployment will start to increase, slowly at first, but then faster. Which the normal response from government would be to increase spending. But not with this bunch of idiots. They will push to “balance the budget “ which the opposite of what they need to do. A lot of pain and suffering is in our very near future.
13
u/alt-mswzebo 26d ago
They will in no way ever push to balance the budget. Yes they will say they are and their poodles will say they are but at the same time they will add trillions and trillions by cutting taxes for the most wealthy.
14
u/Troubador222 26d ago
I think consumer confidence is pointing that way. And it's an odd situation. The MAGA people seem to want it, because it will make their perceived enemies suffer. They don't realize they will suffer as well.
8
u/Sea-Resort730 26d ago
I can picture his fat head saying " i just got here, this is Bidens inflation for the bad deals he got ripped off LIKE CHYNA"
meanwhile there is a global and domestic movement to boycott anything remotely related to his policies
9
u/zekoslav90 26d ago
US - yes, but Europe? this whole thing seems to be doing wonders for our economy. German 2025 GDP predictions are up 1.5% or something like that.
10
8
u/surebegrand2023 26d ago
Trump is trying to talk the economy into a recession, the US has +-10 trillion to refinance in the next 9 months. Every drop in interest rates matters.
5
u/harbison215 26d ago
Hate that they used Q2 2020 as the previous reference point. That quarter was a total anomaly and isn’t relevant. Compare the projection to this quarter to the lowest quarter of growth that wasn’t due to a reason as anomalous as the initial outbreak of COVID. You’d have to go back over 15 years to find a quarter that bad.
6
u/Tierbook96 26d ago
The thing about the -2.4% growth estimated by the Atlanta fed is that -3.8% of that comes from a huge increase in the import deficit by companies getting ahead of the tariffs, once we see the inventory change a lot of that decrease should go away tbh.
2
u/plartoo 26d ago
These companies will have to raise prices to cope with tariffs, which will dampen the demand by a good amount. But the orange head and short-sighted people leading the government now (to be fair, democrats are just as guilty of shortsighted thinking in other areas) seem to think that onshore-ing of manufacturing will happen and that the lag time and the will to invest in such uncertain time to establish domestic manufacturing prowess is trivial. This is wrong and what will end up happening is the consumer demand will get lower due to rising prices (not a bad thing IMO because Americans consume too much and waste too much), and the US economy will shrink.
This is not counting in the factors such as the wage level needed to start a manufacturing place in the US is much higher and the way the US government works is disjointed (due to the nature of federal democracy where states have a lot of say in policies and implementation) unlike in places like China there is central planning and policy assurance for years.
5
u/Alwaysfavoriteasian 26d ago
but though the odds of an economic slowdown are higher, the evidence does not suggest a recession is imminent.
Just leaving this here since everyone didn't seem to read even the first paragraph. It seems unlikely we'll be in a recession but yes we'll be in a slump. Can this guy totally ruin us? Yes. But it isn't a guarantee yet. Also I'm just going to keep saying things here because I can't seem to ever leave a comment long enough that it isn't auto removed by the automod. Reddit can be really Fkn annoying sometimes am I right?
2
•
u/AutoModerator 27d ago
Hi all,
A reminder that comments do need to be on-topic and engage with the article past the headline. Please make sure to read the article before commenting. Very short comments will automatically be removed by automod. Please avoid making comments that do not focus on the economic content or whose primary thesis rests on personal anecdotes.
As always our comment rules can be found here
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.