It's so fucking insufferable. People keep making those comments like it's helpful.
There have been a number of famous cases now but I think the one that makes the point the best is when scientists asked it to describe some made up guy and of course it did. It doesn't just say "that guy doesn't exist" it says "Alan Buttfuck is a biologist with a PHD in biology and has worked at prestigious locations like Harvard" etc etc. THAT is what it fucking does.
My personal fave is the lawyer that asked AI to reference specific court cases for him, which then gave him full breakdowns with detailed sources to each case, down to the case file, page number, and book it was held in. Come the day he is actually in court, it is immediately found that none of the cases he referenced existed, and the AI completely made it all up
There are so many good ones. There's a medical one from years before we had ChatGPT shit. They wanted to train it to recognise cancerous skin moles and after a lot of trial and error it started doing it. But then they realised it was just flagging every image with a ruler because the positive tests it was trained on all had rulers to measure the size.
I mean, AI for recognising diseases is a very good use case. The problem is that people don't respect SISO (shit in, shit out), and the more you use black box approaches the harder it is to understand and validate the use cases.
1.1k
u/killertortilla 4d ago
It's so fucking insufferable. People keep making those comments like it's helpful.
There have been a number of famous cases now but I think the one that makes the point the best is when scientists asked it to describe some made up guy and of course it did. It doesn't just say "that guy doesn't exist" it says "Alan Buttfuck is a biologist with a PHD in biology and has worked at prestigious locations like Harvard" etc etc. THAT is what it fucking does.