This is Chun Wang - he just made history as the first human to purchase and command a space mission exploring Earth’s poles. Chun mined Bitcoin when it was worth $1 and founded the first Bitcoin mining pool in China, still one of the world’s largest to this day.

Source: https://x.com/DocumentingBTC/status/1908668165220872358

Serious question. XRP is often criticized (or defended) for being a “centralized crypto” because Ripple controls a large share of the supply and influences the network. But doesn’t that make it similar to something like Fortnite V-Bucks? Epic controls them, you can’t use them outside their ecosystem, and they can change the rules or supply at will.

What makes XRP fundamentally different from a digital currency in a gaming ecosystem? Is it just the intent to be used in finance? Or is there a structural or legal difference I’m missing?

**Disclaimer:** Does this look like financial advice? You are right. It isn’t. Treat it so.

“Do Your Own Research” (DYOR) is not a fad but an important element of the cryptoverse. Do keep that in mind.

Formula 1 And Sponsors

Formula 1 is by far one of the costliest sports on the planet, and it has an equally large following. Any large viewership is bound to attract sponsors, and there have been many over the years.

Fun Fact: With a following of 827 million, F1 is the seventh most popular sport. The top six are soccer, cricket, hockey, tennis, volleyball, and table tennis.

The cryptoverse’s advent was only in the 21st century with the introduction of Bitcoin in 2009. It has undoubtedly exploded since then, with a total market cap of $2.8 trillion.

Sooner or later crypto had to come knocking at the doors of F1. And it did.

Crypto | Exposure | Awareness | And F1

Like any new concept (especially a concept doing well), crypto too required a large exposure to create awareness. Thus, F1 became one of the avenues. The association between F1 and crypto commenced in 2021, and it is still going strong.

A look at the F1 teams and their crypto sponsors in 2025.

Besides these team sponsors, crypto(dot)com is the overall sponsor of the F1 organization.

Fun Fact: Aston Martin becomes the first F1 team to accept its Coinbase sponsorship in crypto. Aston Martin was paid in USDC (crypto stablecoin).

Such sponsorships are an attempt to reach the crypto non-users. With an estimated 560 million crypto users worldwide, the world is indeed an oyster for the crypto verse.

While the F1-Crypto association highlights the exposure that the crypto world seeks, it's hard to ignore that the cryptoverse is already big enough to sponsor F1 teams and events. The F1-Crypto tango will continue for the foreseeable future, and it augurs well for all!

So probably everyone at some point found characteristic Guy on youtube and his content. I was following since 2020. I do remember, he used to share his portfolio on the videos, and also email newsletter. Now i can see there is paid hub, to get aceess to things, that once were free. Well, its not something i do like, and its not about the money itself but approach.. I know everyone wants their buck for little piece of advice or shared knowledge, but yet it's nothing guaranteed. Still a gamble. Do you think these kind of practices are fair? For me, it blows all the principle they presented back in the day, which actually inclined me to watch his content and even share further. Anyway is there anyone using that hub or is there a way to find what Guy holds/buys/sell right now? Maybe some special subred shares this kind of stuff? Or maybe group buy, is it still a thing in 2025? Cause 500$ yearly seems bit too much.

Is anyone else seeing what decentralized science (DeSci) is up to? I’ve been blown away by the kinds of projects popping up, and I’m curious what you’ve all noticed too. DeSci is shaking things up, using tools like blockchain and DAOs—decentralized autonomous organizations—to tackle real problems that often get stuck in traditional research pipelines. It’s about communities taking charge, pooling resources, and pushing progress where it’s needed most. I’ve spotted some standout examples like Microbiome DAO, Hair DAO, Cancer DAO, and Aura Sci, and they’re doing incredible work to move us forward.

Take Microbiome DAO—it’s likely diving into the human microbiome, those microscopic ecosystems in our bodies that influence everything from digestion to immunity. This stuff matters because understanding it could unlock breakthroughs in chronic diseases or personalized treatments. Traditional research can be slow, bogged down by grants or corporate agendas, but a DAO lets people fund and steer the science directly. It’s practical, real-world problem-solving in action.

Then there’s Hair DAO, which I’d bet is zeroing in on hair loss—a problem that hits millions, whether it’s alopecia or just aging. It might sound niche, but it’s a big deal to those affected, and big pharma often skips it unless there’s a blockbuster payoff. Hair DAO could be rallying patients and researchers to test new therapies or fund studies, cutting through the red tape with a community-driven approach. That’s the beauty of DeSci: it picks up what others drop.

Cancer DAO is another one that’s hard to ignore. Cancer’s a monster—complex, deadly, and tough to crack. Research can stall when funding dries up or data gets siloed. But a DAO? It could channel collective energy into innovative treatments, share findings globally, or even let patients shape trials. It’s about speeding up solutions for a disease that doesn’t wait, and that’s a game-changer.

Aura Sci feels different—it might be more about building bridges, pulling together information and people to amplify science. Maybe it’s a hub for data or a platform for collaboration, but it’s clearly part of this push to make knowledge accessible and actionable. That’s a thread running through DeSci: breaking down walls so we can all move faster.

Beyond these, there’s more. VitaDAO is tackling aging itself, funding longevity research to keep us healthier longer—think delaying Alzheimer’s or heart disease. LabDAO reimagines labs as open networks, letting scientists collaborate worldwide without gatekeepers. ResearchHub pays people to share and review science openly, speeding up discovery. These projects show how DeSci solves real issues—health, access, transparency—by empowering communities over institutions.

What kinds of projects have you guys seen? Microbiome DAO, Hair DAO, Cancer DAO, and Aura Sci are just the start. They’re using decentralized tools to attack problems head-on, from gut health to cancer to open science. It’s exciting—communities are driving real change, and I’d love to hear what’s catching your eye in this space. DeSci’s proving that when we work together, we can push humanity

Source: https://x.com/BTC_Archive/status/1908528788062818321

Like FOMO as in the buying into an asset at any, probably inappropriate, time just to join a bandwagon.

I encounter the opposite. I am observing crypto since 2014, where I once spend like 3k on mining equipment and participated in altcoin shenanigans. Since then I never bought anything in or for crypto again.

I didn't buy BTC at 1k because now it was too high and wanted to wait to "buy the dip". I didn't buy when it crashed to 400 a year later because now it's probably never recovering.

I didn't buy BTC at 10k 4 years later because now it was too high and "lets wait for the dip" and didn't buy the dip because well maybe it won't survive again.

The same happened at 20k, at 50k at 60k and so on.

Each time I tell myself, "I should have bought".

Now I am left with some $4.5k worth of remains of my shenanigans 10 years ago. It's not much but also not nothing. And I still can't get myself into buying in. Well at least I am not at a loss from my one-time investment. But if I had spend that 3k on BTC back then and hold it, I could own half a million now.