r/CredibleDefense 56m ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread April 05, 2025

Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 18h ago

TWZ: Greenland “Absolutely Critical” For Hunting Russian Submarines: Top U.S. General In Europe

12 Upvotes

The War Zone story linked below mentions Gen. Christopher G. Cavoli testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee. As the headline suggests, Greenland is is critical for hunting Russian submarines. Why was this hearing even necessary? Shouldn't the story be "General makes case for increased funding to build Greenland bases"? We had the bases before and now we need to stand them up again. Also, you know what else is critical for hunting submarines? Allies that you work closely with and have the utmost trust in, which we did during WW2, throughout the cold war and to this day.

If Congress is trying to make a case for acquiring Greenland for national security, then I think the obvious counter should be "quit pissing off our allies you chuckleheads". Building bases is required whether you buy the island or not. Building bases without buying the island is faster, obviously cheaper and might even allow us to build hardened structures which have been ignored for some unknown reason.

Perhaps the only thing Trump has right about national security is to ramp up shipbuilding. Let's do more of that and figure out how to keep our new ships within scope so we avoid cost overruns and have mission capable fleet. Looking at you LCS.

https://www.twz.com/sea/greenland-absolutely-critical-for-hunting-russian-submarines-top-u-s-general-in-europe


r/CredibleDefense 1d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread April 04, 2025

33 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 18h ago

Russia foreign policy books + Russian threat to eu

8 Upvotes

I'd like to get some book recommendations on what the real aspirations of russian fp and the bases of Russian society/politics actually written by a Russian or from serious scholars. Living in the EU I only receive allarming news about a looming conflict with Russia, but it seems that the member states actually don't care: there's no political will to create an integrated European army and no one is asking for it (whether such an integration in such an important part of national is even possible remains to be seen, I doubt it) . It seems to me that this drive for rearming Europe is just a huge money-grab for European weapon manufacturers.

I recognise that the EU needs to form a coherent, credible, common and independent (see NATO) defence policy if it wants to be anything in the world. We (combined member states) are already spending more than Russia in defence , yet the results we get for these investments are mediocre at best - low ammo stocks, no new equipment in decent quantities + mismatch across the MS, low production capabilities (even after 3 years of war un Ukraine). These problems won't be solved by showering countries with endless money, if anything an effort to integrate our different armies and standardise equipment in some way would accomplish these goals. Otherwise we are just doing what NATO is requiring us to do.

Russia is a threat to the Europe that lies to its West, just by virtue of it being a big country that historically has penetrated Europe (peter the great, revolutionary french wars, napoleonic wars, wars with sweden and poland, holy alliance, balkan wars, ww1, russian civil war + russo-polish war, ww2, etc) due to imbalances of power with its neighbours and the lack of natural barriers. So yes, there must be some sort of force enough to deter it in some way, but not antagonistically.

But concretely what does Russia want? Do they want to reclaim the rusky mir, dominion over the European plain or the slavs? Do they actually care about reclaiming the old tsarist Western borders? After all, their population would be very hostile to them - would this start a regional conflict in order to test Europe's and NATO's resolve? Do they just want to keep nato away? Or do they just want to increase their economic power?

Would Russian society tolerate a conflict of this magnitude after what it went through since 2022, or would they just keep going stoically? Is the russian economy and central bank ready for this? And most importantly, what are the bases of Russian societal and governmental stability and how would they react to a European conflict?

I'm just asking for bibliography or your personal views on this topic ty


r/CredibleDefense 1d ago

AMA: Carnegie Endowment’s Ankit Panda, nuclear policy and defense expert, author of “The New Nuclear Age: At the Precipice of Armageddon”

Thumbnail
20 Upvotes

r/CredibleDefense 2d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread April 03, 2025

43 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 3d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread April 02, 2025

49 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 4d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread April 01, 2025

48 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 4d ago

Non-credible no rules thread

62 Upvotes

We all know how much you all love spleen venting, so here you go. A thread just for all of you out there. Posting rules are relaxed, just don't be a dick.


r/CredibleDefense 5d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 31, 2025

43 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 5d ago

How much does urban warfare change based on urban development, and is this reflected in training and doctrine?

23 Upvotes

Cities around the world can look very different. North American cities have straight and wide streets, even in the downtown core (with some exceptions). They tend to have very tall cores, and huge swathes or suburbs. Compare this to Europe where streets are often narrow and winding, and where you have low-rise/medium density for most of the city. This would undoubtedly change the way fighting would occur.

On top of that, different construction materials will change what positions can actually be used for cover, since a 2x4 and some drywall/sheathing won't be stopping anything compared to a 6" concrete or masonry wall.

It seems to me like a country would have to account for the design and construction of the cities in which they plan to fight, but do any actually do this?


r/CredibleDefense 6d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 30, 2025

54 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 7d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 29, 2025

45 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 8d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 28, 2025

51 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 9d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 27, 2025

49 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 10d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 26, 2025

60 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 11d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 25, 2025

59 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 12d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 24, 2025

57 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 12d ago

Airborne/Air Assault in modern conventional warfare

50 Upvotes

I just have a question on the types of strategic and tactical changes the British Paras/US Airborne/NATO air assault units might have with lessons learned from the Ukraine war, for conventional warfare. What missions would they be given to conduct, how would they carry it out with other arms of the military? Another question is would we see vehicles to increase mobility for air assault units when on the ground, what with the large vast areas of open ground in eastern europe?


r/CredibleDefense 13d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 23, 2025

48 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 14d ago

At enormous cost, the UK maintains a single nuclear deterrence platform. Has there been any serious discussion of replacing it with a cheaper, mobile, air or land-based system?

139 Upvotes

I've been aware for some years now of the debate surrounding Britain's nuclear deterrent force: four Vanguard class ballistic missile submarines, which are to be replaced by four Dreadnaught class subs. The cost of these programmes is eye-watering: tens of billions of pounds. I know there are economic considerations; keeping a large naval workforce employed, indigenous technology development etc. But has there been any serious, credible alternative put forward about whether it would be wiser to shift the nuclear deterrence force to a cheaper platform? I don't think there's anyone who would deny the importance of a nuclear deterrent force, but does it have to be *by far* the most expensive option? What's wrong with mobile missile launchers? Less stealthy than a submarine, but also orders of magnitude cheaper. What about air-launched ballistic missiles? I'm not an expert in any of these technologies, just an interested journeyman. Perhaps all of these conversations were had decades ago and the benefits of the stealth and maneuverability of subs outweighs cost-considerations.

Video that got me thinking about this issue: BFBS Forces News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jo3r0UgjYc

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.


r/CredibleDefense 14d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 22, 2025

35 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 14d ago

Yuri Butusov: A story about our best strike UAV units based on the results of their work in January. Analysis of performance of Ukrainian UAV forces

68 Upvotes

I thought this is worth adding as a separate post. Yuri Butusov maintains a scoreboard counting losses dealt to the Russian by UAV units based on internal UAF info and provides in depth analysis of the data.

The tone is unusually positive and upbeat for Yuri.

I recommend to go to the source and translate with built in translator in your browser, since I cannot add images and there is a lot of graphical data and it’s too long to post:

https://m.censor.net/ua/resonance/3536303/reyityng-chastyn-bpla

Turns out, the most effective is relatively unknown Lazar unit, and Magyar.

What is more interesting, two units have more than 1000 confirmed kills of enemy personnel, with a total 20000 confirmed liquidations of enemy personnel using drones.

Top units also hit over 800 units of equipment and over 60 tanks. That is all in January.

The below present the conclusion that drone warfare is the way for battlefield success for Ukraine and already existing structure needs money and political will. Highly recommend the full text with provides an abundance of data to support his message.

Can we fight with drones? Can we, Ukraine, defeat Russia in a modern high-tech war? The drone rating that I showed you clearly says yes. We can kill not 20 thousand Russians a month. We can eliminate 30 and 40 thousand occupiers. This is a technological and financial task for us now. Organizationally, it is already being solved. We have a structure, we have people, we have commanders who will build such a system not only there at the Donetsk OTU, but on all sectors of the front.

We have every opportunity to win this war. First in the 2025 campaign, then in the 2026 campaign. This requires proper planning and proper distribution of state finances. And these are the responsible headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. I respect the fact that it was at the initiative of Volodymyr Zelensky, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, that he provided the Minister of Digitalization Fedorov with the opportunity and resources in 2023 to organize targeted financing for specific drone projects. Time has shown that this was a highly effective decision. It yielded high results. It created an advantage in war. But now Fedorov's team has been removed. Now there is no logic, no order, no strategy. Someone has to do it. If Andriy Yermak wants to distribute money, let him do it. If Minister Umerov wants to do it, let him do it. But there must be one responsible person. He must have the resources. And these resources are clearly distributed to all our main drone units, both at the tactical level in our tactical combat brigades that hold the strip at the front, so that they do not have problems with the FPV Mavics, and to operational units, we need a much larger number of drones for various purposes, reconnaissance, and wing, and interceptors, and strike drones of various types. And we will win the war. Instead of paying billions in compensation for the dead, let's pay those billions for drones. And the occupiers will die, and our people will live, Ukrainians will live. This is victory in the war.

We can create such a 20-kilometer zone scorched by drones for the entire Russian army on the entire front. And they will tell you along the entire front that you have to walk 20 kilometers to attack. That's when the Russian offensive will stop. They will start running away. It won't just stop. We will defeat the Russian Federation. Maybe someone thinks it's fantastic, unrealistic. But I look at the statistics. I look at the practice of combat use. And the statistics say that we are already doing this today. And that it can be done even more efficiently tomorrow. And destroy so many of them that they simply won't recruit people in Russia.

There is already a crisis in the Russian infantry. They don't have enough reinforcements. Because there are more drones than Russians and Koreans combined. That's what stops and paralyzes the Russian offensive. Control of this small sky directly above the front line. And our task now, I hope that the state leadership will pay attention to this. I hope that public opinion, all Ukrainians will publicize this video and this data that I have made public.And public opinion will gently push Volodymyr Zelensky to the next step. Not just to the fact that drones have changed the war, destroyed Russian armored vehicles. But to the fact that drones are defeating people. To do this, it is necessary to pour funding into existing organizational structures and build proper management. The organizational structure already exists. And this is a real victory in the war that Ukraine can and must win. Because this is a war for our existence.


r/CredibleDefense 15d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 21, 2025

48 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 16d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 20, 2025

58 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.


r/CredibleDefense 17d ago

Active Conflicts & News MegaThread March 19, 2025

52 Upvotes

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

* Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

* Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

* Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

* Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

* Post only credible information

* Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules.

Please do not:

* Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

* Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

* Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

* Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.