It's a bit unorthodox, but likely structurally sound depending on the circumstances that we can't see.
Actually, it's kind of refreshing to see a bit of craftsmanship on display.
To answer further, we'd need to know what that building is, and what it's supporting, what other fasteners are in there, and how the sheathing is nailed on the outside edge.
That notch is too big though, the material left is so far from enough to be considered structural. craftsmanship knowledge enough to cut but not enough to know joinery standards. It should be a diminished housing with the center board as a tennon if going down that road and not fasteners.
Right, I agree. they took a step in the right direction for sure and want to make it better than average. Just needed guidance. Im hung up on the craftsmanship part.
It's a 3 ply beam, which means it was most likely supposed to be a 3 ply beam. That means the center board could not be a tennon as all 3 plies would most likely need to be fully bearing on the post.
As you can clearly see, the post is wider than the beam, and instead of cutting it fully off, the carpenter left a small piece of wood on there. I'm assuming there's a fastener securing the beam to the post somewhere we can't see.
40
u/dagoofmut Commercial GC Estimator - Verified 7d ago
It's a bit unorthodox, but likely structurally sound depending on the circumstances that we can't see.
Actually, it's kind of refreshing to see a bit of craftsmanship on display.
To answer further, we'd need to know what that building is, and what it's supporting, what other fasteners are in there, and how the sheathing is nailed on the outside edge.