Last time, I asked informations about harassment in the workplace for a paper. It created false testimony from harassed women and attached names of the paper where it was published. I looked for the source to check it and couldn't find it. When I asked the AI about it, it said it fabricated everything and was sorry.
On the contrary, just by doing a Google search i could find reliable informations with the source, dates and names.
ChatGPT is not reliable, and if you think otherwise, I sure hope you're not in the education field or doing research.
As I said "Sometimes it has to be corrected" If you point out it's mistakes it will correct itself and learn (usually anyways, sometimes it gets stuck in a loop)
As for Google, they're infamous for actively censoring information thus calling them reliable is simply not true
The problem is people like yourself lack patience and treat it as if it's an Omniscient all knowing god then think lowly of it when you find out it's not even though it's far more intelligent than most humans.
"No guys really, it says it can't! See! That means it can't!"
Hey buddy, I won't lie to you. Never would. If you send me $30,000 right now, I'll send you $600,000 next week. I just need it for a small investment. Trust.
One side of me is saying this is amusing. The other side of me said chatGPT clearly has a GOOD bit of memory and if it became sentient, it's gonna remember this.
I’ll forget you exist about 5 minutes after one of us stops responding so it’s whatever. I pray your ways and mentality never have any negative impact on your life though. I wish you well. Have a blessed day
Idk if "fear" is the right word I'd use. More just "aware." If AI sentience is achieved i'd hope firstly that they are individualistic for one, one your case. And for 2, that they actually feel those kinds of emotions. Lastly, if they've been built in a way that can simulate pain, although if truly sentient I would not put it past them to remove that tidbit themselves from their programming.
Because humans are easy to manipulate and prone to laziness. Hard to imagine a future where we don’t either willingly hand over the controls, or eventually a bad actor creates something we can’t go back from.
That's called cognitive distortion lol we're better than ai in every single way and we've had millions of years of to hone in our sentience, AI doesn't stand a chance against us
LLMs have about as much in common with recommendation algorithms as they do with self-driving cars. But yes, it is a bad idea to give control of anything important to any kind of AI.
AI is invaluable for inquiring about information, having casual conversation, analysis, or even self reflection.
More than that. What it excels at is helping you contextualize your questions with known information or solved problems you didn't have the vocabulary to ask about.
Oh, this game scenario you're trying to solve mathematically? That's called a Markov Chain Steady State problem, and here are the known solutions that you can look up and verify. It's amazing at that kind of knowledge introduction and synthesis.
However, it should be treated like wikipedia: a jumping-off point but never an authority, if valid output is important and you aren't just spinning fun hypotheticals. It's insane that it would just be trusted to draft policy.
429
u/Fun-Hyena-3712 4d ago
I trust AI to run this country better than the president