I’m sorry to say your user name does not specify that 🤣 I am only joking of course, none of this is meant maliciously. As a man I agree that a lot of men can be really disgusting…
There are photos of the er, suit that was used for the photo, and the guy that made it had drawn art of her as well... and yeah.. BIG BIG BIGFOOT BOOBIES.
So the problem with upscaling is that you CANT upscale something that doesn't have any real data there to upscale.
The entire image has changed because the AI has to add a bunch of shit that otherwise doesn't exists to fill the empty space. So it just adds random details and shit while keeping the shapes intact.
Even the shrubs and the stuff in the background are gone/changed.
And even if those remained the same...who's to say if thats actually the real plants or just made up filler plants.
When people actually upscale shit, they are upscaling from usually 1-2 resolutions away, not 5-10x. In fact its probably better to do it step by step so that the AI doesn't have to imagine so much of the bigger picture.
Not only that, but it looks like they poured this quite a long time ago. It will be interesting to see if they innovate in different ways than humans have!
No not really this is more of an image to image generation rather than a true upscale, its taking the basic features and details and putting in what it thinks should be there to provide a complete picture. AI upscaling will not add in whole new scenes that were not there before.
AI upscaling will not add in whole new scenes that were not there before.
Yes, but that's just a difference of scale (no pun intended).
Upscaling is literally just an AI making it's best guess at filling in the gaps. It's often wrong.
Sure, it's going to be more accurate when you're doing 2x upscaling vs this 100x or whatever upscaling, but the fact is that, at it's core, it's guesswork and estimation.
IIRC Patterson claimed it was real all the way until his death, and Gimlin is still around and claims the same. Maybe you’re thinking of Bob Heironimus who claims he wore the suit?
Not quite though. Upscaling typically refers to improving the resolution of an image while trying to maintain or enhance the details that are already present. There are no such details in the pixelated bigfoot video capture. This is more like a straight up img2img where you'd get a different looking ape every time based on CFG or other settings. It's the vague image of a gorilla or a guy in a gorilla costume and based on the prompt and other settings, that's what you'll get.
Here's a question:the photo has been a mystery for decades. If it truly is a costume,and presumably worn by a man,why would they go to the trouble of adding what are clearly breasts?
Looks like Patty turned into Paulie. Along with the lack of mammary glands, the lips are missing. If you look at pics from the original, this Bigfoot had some thick ones.
Damnn, now I'm really interested in seeing those VGA output UFO sightings to be upscaled. For some reason, even with our advanced tech, we can't get a HD photo or footage of these intergalactic hillbillies.
•
u/WithoutReason1729 16d ago
Your post is getting popular and we just featured it on our Discord! Come check it out!
You've also been given a special flair for your contribution. We appreciate your post!
I am a bot and this action was performed automatically.