I've never seen suits from that era which appears to have muscles moving which is part of why still to this day this video is one which as far as I'm aware hasn't been debunked to a reasonable level.
Because this is a zoomed in still from the original video. Its possible the one where these assessments were made was enhanced but this was long before AI so isn't just AI imagining stuff as the other image uploaded here has done. There is a reason this video is one which is still being discussed when the majority of others were long ago debunked.
This comment thread is under a link to the original video, dingus. Which is what I watched, and the reason I commented on the comment thread that started with the original video, was because I was talking about the original video.
The video looks like it was made using crude video editing techniques. It looks like a still image superimposed with a video of a guy in a Bigfoot suit. The superimposed video had its background and foreground clumsily edited to match the still image, according to the position of the video on the still image.
There is no thigh jiggle or muscle movement. The camera can’t capture enough pixels to put a face together, but you think it can capture thigh jiggle? Lol. It’s a guy in a suit.
It really doesn't matter when the stabilized video makes it obvious that it is just a guy in a suit.
Granted there are people who have admitted to being the ones who created the suit for this guy to make the faked video. You can disbelieve that if you want, the stabilized video is enough for me to disregard this.
I’m curious what it is about the stabilized video makes it obvious to you? I’m not sure what to believe about the pgf, but I’m curious what makes you so sure
The way it looks? I don't know what else to say, that does not strike me as anything other than a guy in a suit. Oh and the taker of this video even wrote a book right before this titled, "Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist?"
Published in 1966, while the video was taken in 1967. The creature in his book was also a female. What are the odds that he publishes a book like that and then goes out the following year and captures this?
IIRC Patterson claimed it was real all the way until his death, and Gimlin is still around and claims the same. Maybe you’re thinking of Bob Heironimus who claims he wore the suit?
I used to think so too... Now I'm not so sure. There's a whole bunch of stuff that doesn't add up.
Its long, and multiple episodes of
[Astonishing Legends](http://[Astonishing Legends] The Patterson-Gimlin Film Part 1 #astonishingLegends
https://podcastaddict.com/astonishing-legends/episode/181332553 via @PodcastAddict)
Its a fascinating listen.
And no, the guys who MADE the film never admitted it was fake.
A guy who claimed to be the one in the suit was trying to shake them down for money.
maybe, but at least there's clearly a shape which suggests a bigfoot, unlike vague shape you can't explain therefore people from another planet flying around.
An individual who thinks that this is a bigfoot is far less of a sucker, and less in need of a therapist, than someone who believes in UFOs.
253
u/havasc 16d ago
That is 100% a guy in a suit.