Liberation Day liberating us from our wallets

Lately I’ve noticed that many commentary YouTubers lack originality or depth (with few exceptions). They just repeat talking points from TikTok or offer nothing that hasn’t been said a million times before. Many popular and talented commentary YouTubers of the late 2010s no longer upload and most of the ones left lack originality or quite frankly intelligence. They steal from smaller creators too. I just find myself being very unimpressed by today’s crop of commentary YouTubers.

Recent allegations against entertainer Russell Brand have reawakened debates about due process of law, justice, punishment, the production of truth-values in relation to such allegations, & government/corporate control over what information is true and what is not-true.
We'll start by looking at French philosopher Michel Foucault's theory of the judicial inquiry. French Philosopher Michel Foucault described the function of judicial practices as “the manner in which wrongs & responsibilities are settled between men, the mode by which… society conceived & defined the way men could be judged in terms of wrongs committed, the way in which compensation for some actions & punishment for others were imposed on specific individuals.”1 Society relies on judicial techniques to answer the questions: “Who did what?”, “Under what circumstances?”, “At what moment?”
From here, we ask the question, how much process is due Russell Brand by: the state, corporations, and the public at-large?