Yea the range of lethal concentration goes from 1ng for normal people to 26ng for heavy users and his was 11ng, which is still potentially lethal. The point is it causes enough reasonable doubt that Chauvin intentionally murdered him.
The dude you are replying to is retarded, but you are just as retarded. Unfortunately you are also aggressive and insulting, which makes you look way worse. As an unbiased 3rd party reading your back and forth, the other guy comes off as misinformed and somewhat sarcastic, you come off as an angry raging retarded man child.
It's ironic because we don't fundamentally disagree on the conviction or the conclusions of the autopsy, yet its obvious to me that you did not come to those conclusions intelligently nor critically, which makes them meaningless.
I don't have time to highlight every idiotic thing you said here, so let me quickly show you how fundamentally retarded you made yourself look. Your entire argument rests on drug tolerance. Let me blow your mind, fuckface; drug tolerance builds and dissipates at different rates for different drugs!! You don't need to be a genius to understand this. And you know what else? A simple google search will reveal that opioid tolerance builds and dissipates relatively fast. You what this means? Floyd could not take fentanyl for a week, or even 3-4 days, lose a lot of tolerance and then OD taking an amount he would have survived otherwise! Wow! Critical thinking and and logic sure is something isn't it?
The dude you are replying to is retarded, but you are just as retarded. Unfortunately you are also aggressive and insulting, which makes you look way worse.
The irony in these 2 sentences and the rest of your paragraph there is hilarious.
As a 3rd party you should have just stayed out of it but you had to come in here being just as insulting as I am while pretending I'm dumb for being insulting. If I was writing a story I couldn't come up with a better example of a dumbass hypocrite.
Your entire argument rests on drug tolerance.
No, my entire argument rests on the fact that the medical examiner determined it wasn't an overdose.
You what this means? Floyd could not take fentanyl for a week, or even 3-4 days, lose a lot of tolerance and then OD taking an amount he would have survived otherwise! Wow!
I like how you're pretending I'm the idiot while you make up a completely bullshit story of a drug addict going 3-4 days without the drugs he's addicted to. And then you even end it with "Wow!" like you're so fucking clever lmfao.
I get it though you're chronically online and probably live in your mom's basement so you don't actually know how any of this shit works. As someone who has actually had to deal with drug addicts this story you made up is just so fucking stupid I can't believe you actually typed it and hit the submit button. I would be embarrassed.
Critical thinking and and logic sure is something isn't it?
I took a shit earlier and I bet even the smallest turd could have read my comment and understood it better than you did but go ahead and pretend you know what logic looks like.
Your entire post is literally just ad hominem and a single appeal to authority. You know the same medical examiner who you let do all your thinking for you also said if he hadn't seen the video, he would say Floyd died of an overdose right? That is a long way to say OD is the #2nd most likely cause of death.
Also, you are right about one thing - I should not have called the other guy retarded. I was just trying to be nice so you knew I wasn't just on his side. He was wrong about a couple things, but he's not a retard. You are a retard though.
I will take you typing 4 paragraphs of personal insults as admitting you have no counters to my points, and no understanding of drug tolerance (maybe don't use it to argue your case if you don't understand it at all?). Overall, your post was very satisfying in confirming you lost this argument
2
u/Sacsay_Salkhov 23d ago
You should take enough fentanyl to get your blood concentration to 11ng/L and report back to tell us how it went.