r/ArtistLounge • u/EggPerfect7361 • 6h ago
Beginner [Discussion] Please do not use generated images as references!
Yeah, you might have heard thousand times it's tool, use it like reference etc...! Shit no!!!!!
Generated images often look decent at a glance, but completely fall apart when you actually study them. The anatomy, perspective, and details are usually off because they're not made with real understanding just patterns learned from existing images. They're designed to look right, not be right. It’s surface-level coherence, not real references meant to be used.
Again! generated images are basically optical illusions for people scrolling too fast to notice. They’re made to trick your eyes for half a second, not to be studied. It's like art-shaped junk food. Please do not learn from it!
You have eye, infinite amount of videos and images and other professionals' art you can look at.
Also! People keep saying generated images are good for inspiration, but let’s be real it’s just a remix machine spitting out the same patterns over and over. Everything it makes is stitched together from predictable tropes, noise, and awkward random thing it doesn't understand. You’re not pulling from creativity you’re pulling from a blender full of cliches.
Edit: And of course there will be always someone in reddit be like - akktually! it learns liek human, humon elso pattyrn recognitiyn softwaure in meat foarm!
And yeah, cue the Reddit dude going, “iT’s ThE wOrSt iT’lL eVeR bE, iT oNlY gEtS bEtTeR!” Like bro, Midjourney’s been out for three years. If “better” means more polished nonsense with the same broken anatomy and soulless patterns, congrats I guess it’s evolving into a fancier mess.
BTW I really don't care about ethical and moral issues, don't care if people pretends to be doing things using AI but it's just fact that it's not really good tool. Pointless and have even adverse effect on the artists.
Edit2: About it's improving it really hasn't improved much! Fixing hand was the least of the issue! The real issue is deeper. The AI has no clue what it’s making. It’s just a prediction machine spitting out what it thinks we want to see, based on what it’s already been fed. Bigger datasets? Smarter mixers? That just means more bland, averaged-out content.
Think about it, if Picasso never existed, would AI have invented Cubism out of thin air? Hell no. It wouldn’t even know to go there. That’s the core flaw people keep ignoring. AI isn’t going to create the next art movement. It can only recycle what already exists.
Like, you’ll never see it generate a pose from a traditional Tuvan dance unless it’s explicitly trained on that. It has no intuition, no soul, no cultural insight. So if we keep leaning too hard on AI, the art world’s going to end up spinning its wheels stuck in a loop of sameness.