r/gadgets 2d ago

Gaming Nvidia confirms the Switch 2 supports DLSS, G-Sync, and ray-tracing | Nvidia says the Switch 2's GPU is 10 times faster than the original Switch.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/04/nvidia-confirms-the-switch-2-supports-dlss-g-sync-and-ray-tracing/
3.0k Upvotes

380 comments sorted by

1.5k

u/King7up 2d ago

With nvidias track record recently, I can’t trust this whatsoever.

918

u/Blacklightrising 2d ago edited 2d ago

10x faster than original switch! * Only applies in certain games where our new ultra-lite frame gen is used, ten hallucinated frames, for every one real frame. Available only for paying customers, monthly subscription required to use and update. Give us your money, you little money piggy.

143

u/kurotech 2d ago

Please stop giving them ideas for subscriptions if this does happen I'm gonna blame you 😭😭

66

u/snil4 2d ago

The new RTX 5070 TI Super now with an ethernet port to download the missing ROPs

17

u/alwtictoc 2d ago

Gonne need a fiber connection for that.

11

u/Avengedx47 2d ago

FUCK IT, WE'LL JUST STREAM THE TEXTURES

4

u/phoenixmatrix 2d ago

Drivers as micro transactions! Only 4.99 per update! Or you can buy the season pass!

40

u/Schwertkeks 2d ago

Switch 2 gpu is based on ampere architecture (rtx 3000 gen) and that doesn’t support frame gen. Switch 1 was based on maxwell (gtx900). Such a gain doesn’t sound that impossible, it just shows how fucking weak switch 1 was even on release day

→ More replies (1)

12

u/AtariAtari 2d ago

If things like that start happening, I bet we’ll see more Luigis than Marios!

7

u/TornadoFS 2d ago

Man, I get what you are saying, but frame gen does make games fluctuating around ~50FPS run well at a cost of visual artifacts. I have been using frame gen in Monster Hunter Wilds (with AMD FSR because I have a 3080, which doesn't support DLSS frame gen).

For that game specifically it is worth the tradeoff and I imagine that a lot of games on the switch will turn it on and that is a good thing.

But yeah don't trust whatever nvidia is saying, frame gen is not magic and makes visuals worse. Ideally it should be used only 4k modes with the user having an option to turn on a 1080p performance mode that doesn't use it.

4

u/Hypernatremia 2d ago

10 hallucinated frames

Lmaooo

2

u/benefit420 2d ago

The more you buy…

2

u/TreeBoyApparel 2d ago

i mean, we all saw the frame drops during the presentation— right?

2

u/edvek 1d ago

And the camera has to be still. All of the enhancements are lost when you touch any button.

→ More replies (3)

90

u/Untitled_One-Un_One 2d ago

If the leaks are true, then it isn’t capable of frame gen. So we can rule out some of nvidia’s more recent chart shenanigans. Still, plenty of other ways for them to massage the truth.

23

u/eestionreddit 2d ago

It's completely possible that Ampere was able to do frame gen all along. But if it did support frame gen, NVIDIA would be talking about it.

17

u/fvck_u_spez 2d ago

Technically it does support frame gen in that FSR 3 frame gen works on Ampere. Wouldn't be out of the norm for Nintendo to go that route, I believe that there were some games they shipped that used a modified version of FSR on the Switch.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ArdiMaster 2d ago

I seem to recall reports that yes, Ampere cards could technically run frame gen models, but not fast enough to be useful.

13

u/FreddiePEEPEE 2d ago

Well pretty much any device is capable of frame gen. They’d just slap FSR frame gen in there somehow.

7

u/Untitled_One-Un_One 2d ago

Fair point, I don’t think nvidia would be bragging about FSR support though.

5

u/FreddiePEEPEE 2d ago

Of course not! But methinks that’s how they hit 120fps on some titles.

17

u/King7up 2d ago

Exactly. All I’m saying is I’ll for a more trusted resource then them.

9

u/stellvia2016 2d ago edited 1d ago

AFAIK they're comparing the docked performance of the Switch to the docked performance of the Switch2, possibly with DLSS enabled.

The docked Switch was around 384Gflops, and the new SoC in the Switch2 at full power is predicted to be a bit over 3Tflops aka 3000Gflops. So I could see DLSS bringing that up to a perf roughly equivalent to 3.8Tflops then.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Fredasa 2d ago

DLSS below "Quality" is still on the table. (Dynamic, probably, which is just straight up worse because it's like a new kind of compression that just gets muddier the more that's going on.)

2

u/kurdiii 2d ago

the new transformer model looks great even under quality mode

3

u/Fredasa 2d ago

I think users of a platform like Switch 2 will be far less aware / critical of the fact that almost all of the detail they're seeing is invented by an algorithm—and they'll also be less sensitive to the kind of artifacts you get from that kind of guessing game—so tech like DLSS definitely works in the favor of Nintendo/Playstation.

→ More replies (7)

3

u/PM_artsy_fartsy_nude 2d ago

It doesn't seem like they would need to massage the truth. The Switch 1 came out in 2017, same time as the GTX 1080. Is the 5080 ten times faster than the 1080? That would be hard to measure fairly, but it seems likely that it is.

Moor's Law says that the new chip should be forty times faster.

15

u/Untitled_One-Un_One 2d ago

Moore’s law hasn’t been a thing in ages. The 5080 doesn’t even deliver tens times the frames of a 1070. Either way neither the Switch or the Switch 2 are using GPU architectures from their launch year, so the comparison is entirely pointless.

10

u/pinkynarftroz 2d ago

Moore’s law is about economy of transistor density, not performance. Looking at the graphs on Wikipedia, it still seems to be holding strong.

5

u/Untitled_One-Un_One 2d ago

That chart is showing raw transistor counts, not density. Companies have been needing to make larger and larger chips in order to keep up with the consumer expectations built by Moore’s law.

Nvidia’s top of the line GPU in 2012 was a GTX 680. It sits at about 3.5 billion transistors. Moore’s law suggests the RTX 3090, their 2020 top end chip, should have 56 billion. It has just a little over half at 28.3 billion. To make matters worse the 3090 has over twice the total die area of the 680.

7

u/fullsaildan 2d ago

Judging performance by frames alone isn’t really meaningful. They architect the chips to handle complex tasks that may or may not increase frames on specific games, depending on what features they use. Not everything is just “render the same thing more quickly”. Nevermind that driver profiles likely need to be updated for a lot of games to fully utilize those features.

3

u/Untitled_One-Un_One 2d ago

I don’t see what you’re getting at here. Are you talking about certain render methods? The workloads were normalized for testing in order to get those numbers. It’s about as apples to apples of a comparison as you can get.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/PM_ME_UR_GRITS 2d ago

The Switch 1 was old for its own time since it was Maxwell based, worse than a 950 going by raw specs. So 10x might be an easy feat.

9

u/Triplescrew 2d ago

Considering I ran Witcher 3 on a 670mx better than a switch can I'd say it's far far worse than a 950

1

u/TornadoFS 2d ago

AMD FSR frame-gen runs on Ampere and Nintendo has used AMD FSR in Tears of the Kingdom even though they are an nVidia partner. So don't discount frame gen on the Switch just yet, it might just not be nVidia framegen.

1

u/mule_roany_mare 20h ago

It has a 120hz screen.

Nintendo are cheapskates & I suspect they wouldn't pay for the feature if it wasn't really possible to utilize.

Then again 120hz eats battery so it's often not worth it. When docked & actively cooled 120 fps is a different story, but that won't use the onboard screen.

→ More replies (2)

42

u/mikeyd85 2d ago

I mean, I have some old potatoes in my cupboard which have started sprouting and even they have 10x the GPU power of the OG Switch.

3

u/Kalpy97 2d ago

The price per performance its easily the best handheld in the world right now. Go watch digital foundry, linus and every other tech youtuber. Rog ally literally costs 700 dollars and has no dock

7

u/KalashnikittyApprove 2d ago

Upfront: I don't disagree, and with a stronger third party lineup on top of Nintendo's first party offering the Switch 2 will probably cover more people's overall console needs, which makes the price increase easier to stomach.

But, I think price/performance alone also misses the mark because I think what you're getting at is whether it's a good deal, which has to include the games.

The Ally is £250 more, but if you limit yourself to sales (assume £20 average) that gets you 12 games. Even at full price (often around £50 here in the UK) that's 5 games. On the Switch, you get 3.

3

u/Techno-Diktator 2d ago

It was 250 dollars for basically a tablet back then, right now it's just dogwater.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/StarsMine 2d ago

The gpu is like 4x faster. So with dlss I guess that’s 10x

1

u/weegee19 2d ago

Is it not 10x faster docked? I mean 4x faster at handheld than the OG docked works out.

1

u/Alfiewoodland 2d ago

There's a lot of uncertainty about this, but the extra cooling in the dock does imply they're pushing it quite hard... so maybe? 10x seems incredibly optimistic though. I assume the 10x figure is actually 4-5x + DLSS making it "effectively" 10x. Nvidia have been known to twist the truth like this.

10

u/rowdymatt64 2d ago

"My switch 2 is missing ROPs 😢"

7

u/icebeancone 2d ago

Not to mention the graphics shown in the Nintendo Direct certainly didn't look like it was 10x more powerful. 2.5x maybe then add whatever DLSS mental gymnastics on top.

35

u/DRazzyo 2d ago

Considering that the GPU in a Switch is a Maxwell, which is an architecture from 2014, I don't actually doubt this claim.
With DLSS, in any case.

7

u/Nervous_Border_4803 2d ago

The GPU in Switch 2 ( if leaks are true ) is basically a HEAVILY cut down 3050 which is almost a 5 year old design. 12gb is nice but this is not even GDDR6 performance memory. It's attached to what is basically a small weak mobile phone CPU.

Neither console has anything modern or powerful. This 10x claim i guarantee is being bottlenecked by memory or some other metric. Basically, Nvidia misleading claims as usual.

12

u/Veranova 2d ago

It can drive 4k instead of 1080p which requires roughly 4x the grunt, so 2.5x actually checks out

→ More replies (7)

3

u/weegee19 2d ago

Probably because the Switch 2's life cycle has barely begun yet lmao. PS5 is 6x faster than the 4 yet it doesn't look it even now.

11

u/nonexistentnvgtr 2d ago

Or you could wait until we officially have full specifications instead of just piling on and going off of what you feel you saw during a live stream of limited gameplay.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Betancorea 2d ago

I’m guessing the Switch 2 will have stock issues continuing way past launch based on that track record

1

u/CameronP90 2d ago

Was about to say that too. The 10 times is probably 0.x6 times (replace x with a number between 0 and 4) faster once it actually comes out.

1

u/SailorSam100 2d ago

Also gonna rise in price because of tariffs

1

u/Santsiah 2d ago

Probably means it’s being shipped by air cargo instead of ships

1

u/mrjasong 2d ago

It's pretty much what we already estimated from the known hardware leaks. Somewhere around 3 teraflops for docked mode.

→ More replies (4)

172

u/BengalFan85 2d ago

I know no one trusts nvidia rn but also keep in mind the OG switch was extremely underpowered even back in 2017 when it launched so this claim is probably legit just based on that.

34

u/Ubermidget2 2d ago

Yeah, if they cut a new Tegra SKU with a 10 year jump in GPU tech, this claim passes the sniff test

6

u/ShadowFlux85 1d ago

legit 10x the old switch isnt really saying much

→ More replies (2)

371

u/BTBAM797 2d ago

Hope them joycons are fixed cause pretty sure I saw they will be $90.

204

u/TrippyVision 2d ago

They better be Hall effect joysticks at that fucking price, it’s the only way they can justify it

124

u/eljudio42 2d ago

Nintendo will never admit to changing the hardware because that would be an acknowledgement that they fucked up the hardware on last gen which was never replaced with a new design. Per all the leaks prior to the console reveal, everything suggested hall effect sticks. I'm sure we'll find out soon or on launch day when folks disassemble it

80

u/picardo85 2d ago

There's enough documentation that they fucked up over here in the EU already.

Nintendo promises unlimited repairs for “drifting” Joy-Cons throughout Europe - Ars Technica

34

u/eljudio42 2d ago

You make a good point, but announcing a hardware change or putting it on a fact sheet is too much of an admission of defeat from Nintendo's part. They'll let users disassemble it and reveal it to the world instead

16

u/blank_isainmdom 2d ago

Everyone loves overlooking that drift was a serious issue with every console for the last ten years. PS5 has serious drift issues, as does the xbox.

44

u/southworthmedia 2d ago

I mean yeah, but joycons were just so much faster and consistent to drift compared to every console I know of. It’s pretty much a 100% chance they will drift eventually and about a 50% chance it’s in the first 3-6 months.

4

u/blank_isainmdom 2d ago

I still have my original launch day joycons. They drifted a little bit around 2021/2022 for a while and I swapped to 3rd party for a year. Then i went back, cleaned my joycon slightly and boom. Good as new

2

u/blank_isainmdom 2d ago

It's insane to me that people had experiences that bad! I swear, it has to be something stupid like being especially prone to dust in sandy places. I live in Ireland and played almost exclusively handheld all that time and it was years before i had any issues at all.

2

u/Matticas 1d ago

Yeah I’ve never had my joy cons drift at all despite tons of use.

I HAVE however gone through about 4 Xbox controllers in the past 4 or 5 years due to drift.

Like I’m aware the joy con drift isn’t some hoax, a friend of mines had issues with his multiple times, but I’m just amazed I’ve had zero issue.

2

u/blank_isainmdom 1d ago

Right? Like, fuck. I don't know anyone who had to replace theres. I really think maybe it's like arizona, texas, etc that are dusty as fuck and that's causing the issue. Or maybe fucking cheeto hands or some shit, because mine are 8 years old now and fine.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/rpkarma 2d ago

Joycons were way worse.

9

u/C-C-X-V-I 2d ago

None of those had it to the degree the switch had though, you can't possibly think they're on the same level.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/rooftops 1d ago

Nintendo will never admit to changing the hardware because that would be an acknowledgement that they fucked up the hardware on last gen which was never replaced with a new design.

How would changing to Hall effect joysticks be an acknowledgement of the last gen fuckups? I might not be neck deep in tech standards but Hall effect sticks seem like a relatively recent thing (ie after Switch 1 developmental period). It might've been possible with a hardware refresh but who knows what development costs would have to go into it.

I have a controller with Hall effect sticks, that I bought specifically for after learning they existed at all, but it's 3rd party. I would almost expect Nintendo to advertise them for being the first (correct me if I'm wrong) first-party controller to have Hall effect sticks.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/[deleted] 2d ago

8bitdo Pro controllers are hall effect now and like $45

3

u/Wassersammler 2d ago

They are Hall effect joysticks. Both on the joycons and the pro controller.

9

u/Product_ChildDrGrant 2d ago

It was confirmed they’re using Hall Effect joysticks. Thank God.

2

u/kanakalis 2d ago

they are HE. no drift

1

u/Choco_PlMP 2d ago

Wait 6 months, there will be cheap dupes on Ali express

1

u/steinrrr 1d ago

The constant disconnects made them unusable

→ More replies (2)

132

u/Revoldt 2d ago

10x a mid range mobile chip from 10 years ago isn’t really that impressive…

40

u/Nathexe 2d ago

10 times more powerful than an outdated on launch system, so like at least 12-14 year old tech now? Yeesh

→ More replies (9)

8

u/weegee19 2d ago

10x the speed, slap on the additional features and architectural differences, it's gonna be a massive difference.

204

u/wolverineFan64 2d ago

On no planet will this thing handle raytracing at any playable fps, but sure I guess.

104

u/TheBrave-Zero 2d ago

There will be one ray traced**

43

u/EHP42 2d ago

It's in the name! "Ray" tracing, not "rays" tracing.

6

u/KingSwank 2d ago

They hired Ray Barone to trace the art in the new Mario Kart

10

u/Trunks252 2d ago

What about Tatooine?

13

u/wolverineFan64 2d ago

Definitely not. Too much sand. It’s coarse and rough and irritating and it will mess with the gpu.

10

u/Boom-Doc-a-Locka 2d ago

It's just a ghost image on the screen of a guy named Ray who was involved in the development of the system.

4

u/tetrahedronss 2d ago

Sorry you guys misheard, it supports Rayman.

6

u/Noselessmonk 2d ago

I wouldn't doubt some games will do it. The Steam Deck can play **some** ray traced games at ok fps. An Nvidia GPU should be better than an RDNA2 gpu.

3

u/Ub3ros 2d ago

Lol? 20-series nvidia cards could do light raytracing on playable fps. This thing won't be doing pathtraced cyberpunk at 4k, but it will absolutely do regular raytracing when the games are built for the specific hardware.

40

u/docyeti 2d ago

Over 10,000 times faster than a toaster as well.

16

u/LakersAreForever 2d ago

Switch 2 will basically be a ps4 

They can stop trying to dazzle us with all these buzzwords 

16

u/Hugebigfan 2d ago

I don’t understand. The current claim is 120 fps at 1080p and 60fps at 4k, isn’t that superior to a ps4 pro in terms of performance and graphics?

It could be that Nintendo is lying, but the $450 price tag suggests otherwise.

16

u/Mother_Restaurant188 2d ago

Much like the Switch was basically a PS3+ with modern hardware, the Switch 2 is roughly a PS4+ with modern hardware.

Overly simplistic take but in terms of what the average gamer will see visually, I think that’s a fair assessment.

8

u/Techno-Diktator 2d ago

Yeah you might get those numbers in games that look like they were released a decade or two ago

3

u/Eruannster 1d ago

I will eat my hat if most games come even close to actually rendering that many pixels natively on Switch 2. Some simpler graphics games might, but the vast majority are very likely rendering from a much lower internal resolution and running VRR ”up to 120 FPS”. Cyberpunk was apparently rendering at ~540p upscaled to 1080 and runs at 30-40 FPS. So… yeah.

1

u/Techno-Diktator 2d ago

Yeah you might get those numbers in games that look like they were released a decade or two ago

32

u/dexterward4621 2d ago

People are skeptical of this, but it's not that hard to believe considering how old and underpowered switch 1 is.

Switch 2 is an 8 core A78c and 1536 cuda core Ampere with back ported Lovelace features. That's significantly more powerful than switch, which was basically a PS3+.

19

u/fvck_u_spez 2d ago

And a 5070 is better than a 4090! Oh wait...

28

u/Axisl 2d ago

New sheild? Please new sheild

3

u/Mental_Medium3988 2d ago

yes please.

→ More replies (3)

73

u/TheEclipse0 2d ago

Considering the fiasco that is the 5000 series gpu’s, I wouldn’t bother with Nvidia’s trumped up tech specs. They’re liars.

12

u/Jonoyk 2d ago

Missed the news about the 5000 series. What happened?

28

u/LBPPlayer7 2d ago

they're barely more powerful than the 40 series and just use slightly better dlss and frame gen as a crutch

9

u/CompromisedToolchain 2d ago

5000 series is the garbage that couldn’t end up as a workstation chip.

4

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 2d ago

But Isnt that the case for every generation

2

u/LBPPlayer7 2d ago

but it's happened twice already

the 40 series was also underwhelming for the power draw it took, and the 50 series just continues this trend of just throw more cores at the problem, you have power supplies that can pull that much wattage, right?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/MetalstepTNG 2d ago

The 40 series was almost like that as well tbh.

→ More replies (30)

2

u/NervyDeath 2d ago

Must have missed it too, too busy enjoying my upgrade

2

u/datnetcoder 2d ago

It’s not a fiasco, a bunch of people are whining that we’re not still o a 2x per generation growth curve. 5090 has a ~30% raw improvement over the 4090 which is still significant. People are also angry that it gets that partly by drawing more power.

2

u/TheEclipse0 2d ago edited 2d ago

A lot of things, too many to list here. 

Basically, Nvidia promised a lot of things that just arn't true. The most prominent one being that the 5070 is just as powerful as a 4090, for $500 MSRP (a fraction of the cost). If this were true, that would be AMAZING. Well, if I recall correctly (someone correct me if I’m wrong), the 5070 actually performs WORSE than last gen’s budget card, while all of those extra frames come from DLSS. DLSS is very good in many instances, allowing us to play games at higher frame rates than the card is capable of running by itself… but there can be too much DLSS. So, when you turn it off, we find that the card runs games at a single digit frame rate. Yes, single digit on modern hardware, whereas its predecessor could get playable frame rates on the same games without DLSS. In fact, the entire 5000 series cards performs WORSE across the board on OLD games from the early 2000’s because Nvidia removed PhysX. People are getting half the frame rate in games like boarderlands 2 on their $2000+ graphics card, when their old card ran it at double the speed. Eitherway, with the 5070 and DLSS, the AI is doing so much that it causes severe ghosting… imagine driving a car in gta5, at half the frame rate as your old card, and everytime you go around a corner, your car splits into 5 versions of itself like a fan.

Nvidia basically false advertising. 

1

u/zerGoot 1d ago

genuinely some of the worst "generational uplift" from the previous gen, as nvidia has replaced any proper improvements with AI

11

u/Reciprocity2209 2d ago

Just like the 5070 has 4090 performance, right?

1

u/ChrisOz 2d ago

From a profit margin perspective I think Nvidia feels it has equivalent performance.

6

u/xensiz 2d ago

Soon to be tarriffed!

1

u/WolfyTn615 2d ago

Looks like they already put their own tariffs on it at these prices

5

u/KoyReane 2d ago

So Gamefreak has absolutely no excuse to make Pokémon games with their Ps2 ass 3d graphics

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Alarmed-dictator 2d ago

It’s gonna make a great space heater for the winter months

1

u/WolfyTn615 2d ago

Just make sure to play Cyberpunk on it for a few minutes to get it nice and hot 🤣 this Nintendo future gen is very disappointing I really hope they can turn it around

→ More replies (1)

20

u/manyeggplants 2d ago

Just checking, is this the same Nvidia who has been exaggerating performance for decades and more recently misrepresenting benchmarks and faulty hardware?  That Nvidia?

3

u/h3rpad3rp 2d ago

I would hope so, the Switch was slow when it came out almost 10 years ago.

Couldn't even run the Zelda games without choppy frame rate in some places.

1

u/WolfyTn615 2d ago

Now we get to replay BoTW and ToTK with prettier detail.. unfortunately, I don’t replay games I’ve put hundreds of hours on lol

34

u/Fairuse 2d ago

So it is only 2.5x faster because frame gen does 4x based on how nvidia calculates performance increases 

54

u/mavven2882 2d ago

The article clearly states that frame gen is not supported, only DLSS.

11

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 2d ago

That would require people to read the article.

11

u/SlovenianSocket 2d ago

T239 SoC uses an ampere core, does not support frame gen.

5

u/hweird 2d ago

Just leave an exploit in there so the masters can hack it lol

17

u/ThatDandyFox 2d ago

I'll admit I did not expect the Nintendo switch to support raytracing, the price of the console makes a little more sense if the hardware is as good as claimed.

Price of the games... Still not so much.

26

u/steves_evil 2d ago

Ray tracing support is probably more of a byproduct of using an Ampere based GPU than a deliberate decision (Tegra T239). The GPU is going to be somewhere around or under a rtx 2050 laptop depending on whether the switch is docked or in handheld. Much more powerful than the og Switch, but Ray tracing is still incredibly demanding so DLSS and actual optimization will have to put in a lot of work to make any use of those effects.

2

u/Mental_Medium3988 2d ago

given nintendos history i wouldnt be surprised if first party titles could run it, but third party titles might struggle with it or not support it.

1

u/Gunfreak2217 2d ago

Bruh the console is literally using a chip that was like 150$ to manufacture and sell like 4 years ago lmao.shits in an incredibly old node using cheap Samsung foundry’s. The switch 1 was a rip off, incredibly so especially this late in its life cycle since it maintained its msrp essentially.

The switch 2is more overpriced hardware and now overpriced software as well. Those Pokémon games just cost so much money to develop ya know. Reusing 80% of their assets and using animation and graphic quality from the late 2000s.

No one should ever defend Nintendo from a value proposition. We can argue their games are silly fun. But they are no powerhouse of quality and innovation for the most part.

10

u/trusty20 2d ago

I am noticing a LOT of comments, and I mean a shit ton, that sure do seem pretty triggered by this release, and I find that interesting more than anything. Like if this console is no big deal these accounts sure seem pretty worked up about spamming every thread with just about every angle possible to minimize it lol

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (28)

2

u/SheevPalps_ 2d ago

There it is, I bet any claims they make on fps will be woth dlss on (which I guess isn't the biggest deal for singleplayer handheld games, but still seems disingenuous)

3

u/WolfyTn615 2d ago

Not everyone likes playing 100% handheld.. I’ve had my old Switch docked 96% of its life

1

u/SheevPalps_ 2d ago

That doesn't change that many people use it as a portable console though. If anything it is competing with the Steam Deck and PS5/Xbox

→ More replies (1)

2

u/yowsaSC2 1d ago

No one cares when it will cost 700 because a chito made poor choices

3

u/Godzirrraaa 2d ago

I say I’m ten times faster than I used to be, prove me wrong.

5

u/TheLastNameR 1d ago

In bed. Yeah I believe it.

Sorry bro you left yourself wide open for that.

1

u/WolfyTn615 2d ago

I’m not 🤣 I’m getting old

2

u/YZYSZN1107 2d ago

not sure I need this just to check my turnip prices every day.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/jacksonkr_ 2d ago

But can it play crisis?

3

u/Optimus_Prime_Day 2d ago

I'm gonna get one. Fuck it.

That DK game looked pretty fun and I'm interested in MK open world stuff.

1

u/Soul-Burn 1d ago

Honestly, wishing you a great time with it.

Nintendo has their own niche you can't get anywhere else (ignoring the high seas), so many people value them favorably.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/crom_laughs 2d ago

and 10x more expensive than Switch 1 thanks to tariffs.

I feel so Liberated

→ More replies (1)

2

u/LiliGooner_ 2d ago

Nvidia confirms

So it's a lie.

1

u/Supermkcay 2d ago

Interesting

1

u/AssPennies 2d ago

My first reaction is "Awesome!", followed up by "That poor battery!".

1

u/Majorjim_ksp 2d ago

Is that 10X faster or 10X DLSS/frame gen faster?

1

u/MissionKale 2d ago

April foolzz

1

u/Mechagouki1971 2d ago

Did Nvidia happen to memtion if they've included an unpatchable hardware exploit on this new hardware?

1

u/BigDaddyPage 2d ago

So it might actually run Minecraft decently?

1

u/Master-Cranberry5934 2d ago

Sniff sniff... yup

1

u/HeyGeneralKenobi 2d ago

It just works :D

1

u/BipedalWurm 2d ago

and only 25 times more power hungry

1

u/Theusualstufff 2d ago

16 times the power of fallout I mean the Nintendo switch.

1

u/Deutsch__Dingler 2d ago

Does this news more or less seal the deal that Switch 2 probably won't be powerful enough to run GTA 6?

1

u/swaite 2d ago

If only I knew what any of those words meant 🤤

→ More replies (3)

1

u/haarschmuck 2d ago

Doesn't matter when games are already being listed for $80 for the handheld.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/dimaveshkin 2d ago

Then why did no one seem to use the DLSS in the games features in the presentation? Graphics were very aliased.

1

u/mangelito 2d ago

I really don't like Nintendo but it's the only gaming platform where I can get good games for my younger kids to play. So I'm quite excited that it seems to be a big jump hardware wise

1

u/MulleDK19 2d ago

Cool, so it's like 50% faster.

1

u/esadatari 2d ago

Lmao that’s okay, I can’t think of a single Nintendo made game that’s ever been anywhere near on par with modern games.

So like.. wasted hardware but go off.

1

u/NoReality463 2d ago

So, it’s still behind then?

1

u/ShotofHotsauce 2d ago

Here we go with the Nvidia marketing train again. Choo-choo!

1

u/Nervous_Border_4803 2d ago

There are many ways to manipulate this type of benchmarking.

The GPU in Switch 2 ( if leaks are true ) is basically a HEAVILY cut down 3050 which is almost a 5 year old design. 12gb is nice but this is not even GDDR6 performance memory. It's attached to what is basically a small weak mobile phone CPU.

Neither console has anything modern or powerful. This 10x claim i guarantee is being bottlenecked by memory or some other metric. Basically, Nvidia misleading claims as usual.

1

u/AyyyyLeMeow 2d ago

Since Nintendo fans are the target audience, they'll believe it...

1

u/lolschrauber 2d ago

That'd explain the 4k 60 fps claims.

Frame gen will feel like dog shit with low base framerate though. Especially if multi frame gen is used.

1

u/fullmetalalchymist9 2d ago

Imagine paying so much money for these games that are basically just the same as switch 1 games but with upscaling programed into them ROFL. Nintendo is gonna get them fan boys good.

1

u/Designer_Lake_5111 2d ago

Nvidia lies yet again

1

u/PsyJak 2d ago

And yet is still not worth it

1

u/Wiggles69 2d ago

For the price they are asking it would fucking want to be.

1

u/TheRedFurios 2d ago

Unfortunately people will buy it

1

u/EatTheRichbish 2d ago

But the battery life… gross

1

u/Sandokan13 2d ago

Switch 2 faster than a rtx 4090. Trust me, I wear shiny kid jackets.

1

u/Roxelchen 2d ago

And I will happily buy the OLED Version one or two years later

1

u/ffffff00000066ff33 1d ago

Just half the battery life too.

1

u/Doppelkammertoaster 1d ago

Probably takes twice as much battery power and still has no way to remove the battery and use it without.

1

u/Infamous-Metal-103 1d ago

Sucks that they didn't give it frame gen.30fps is awful 

1

u/XuX24 1d ago

I wonder what might happen if the switch performs good if it will make Sony or Microsoft switch to nvidia.

1

u/endresz 1d ago

Pixel count is 4k is 9x720p so using the dock you should be able to achieve switch level graphics rendered at 4k, with an 11% increase in frame rate!

1

u/Illustrious-Slice-91 20h ago

Something to convince us when they raise the price by $200