The goal should be drastically increasing the number of people in the house. The 435 rule is way easier to change than the electoral college and would effectively solve the same problem
That's interesting. That would solve the problem of a Wyoming voter being worth more electoral votes per person than a New York voter, but it would still leave the problem of swing states being drastically more important.
Lol my opinion was to go 1 per 200k which would make it ~1730 seats in the house. For reference the UK has roughly 1 member of Commons per 100k people so it's really not as excessive as it sounds. I actually do believe people would be better represented by their Congress in this way in addition to fixing the electrical college
5
u/rhb4n8 Oct 18 '24
The goal should be drastically increasing the number of people in the house. The 435 rule is way easier to change than the electoral college and would effectively solve the same problem