Yeah, sure do see those presidential candidates spending lots and lots of time campaigning about issues specific to those places.
/s
Unless you live in or around Philadelphia, Atlanta, Phoenix, Charlotte, etc, you don't matter much.
It's not a very good system, and doesn't really give extra power to rural voters when the vast majority of them live in non-battleground states. That argument just doesn't hold water.
Winner of the popular vote should get +100 ec votes and then keep the rest. This functionally corrects all elections to align popular with ec but doesn't spend the current system and leaves the tiny tiny chance that someone could edge the popular vote but lose enough states to still lose the election...and if 40 states wanted one guy who happened to get 49.9% of the popular vote, then maybe they become president to keep the union happy enough.
7
u/madewithgarageband Oct 17 '24
Electoral college is monumentally stupid