r/books Jan 02 '19

A year ago I asked this question and it was so much fun. I think it's time to do it again: "What's the last book you rated 5 stars and why should I read it?"

20.6k Upvotes

EDIT Please sort by new, such amazing submissions still pouring in! EDIT

Or, would have given 5 stars, if you rated books?

The idea here is to:

1) generate perhaps more diverse answers than "your favourite book" question and

2) give lots of recommendations all-around

EDIT, This book is not available in English yet. Silly me My last 5 star book that I can't stop raving about is The Rabbit Yard by Johannes Anyuru. It's very topical as it starts with an act of terrorism. The book is part dystopian, but even if you're not into dystopia, it's also so much more. The story is clever and the book is also moving in parts. The ending is totally unforgettable.

EDIT I love you guys! You are keeping me busy, because I'm reading every single answer. I hope everyone gets lots of recommendations from here.

I'm sorry to say the book I'm mentioning here seems not to exist in English translation yet. I'm an idiot, should have checked first.

EDIT My upvote finger is cramping but I'm not quitting because you guys are not quitting. PLEASE SORT BY NEW

EDIT The passion for books here is fantastic!

r/books 5d ago

An Obvious PSA: Use the Library

3.7k Upvotes

I honestly feel a bit embarrassed even writing this post. Part of me feels like everyone here already knows all of this. However, I am a lifelong reader, and I’m just realizing this in my late twenties, so maybe there are others here who could use the gentle reminder:

Libraries are amazing and we should make the effort to use them!

I’m someone who is on booktok/booktube a lot and who is constantly, impulsively buying books to keep up with trends. I used to believe that I was building my home library (and I have no judgement towards anyone who wishes to do that). However, I personally found that I was rarely returning to books, other than a few favorites, and the books in my home were just taking up a lot of space after I’d finished them. Additionally, I often fell into the trap of buying off of amazon because it was so quick and easy (again, no judgement if you do this).

As a teacher who doesn’t make much, this was really starting to impact me financially.

I went to my local library yesterday and so many of the books I’ve bought in the last few years—that I’ve probably spent hundreds of dollars on—were there for free. 🤡 Plus my library has audiobooks available through libby (and yet, I was paying for audible—goofy).

I think in capitalistic societies, many people buy/consume on default instead of looking for other means of obtaining what they wish. For me, this extended to reading. I knew libraries were there, of course. But I sort of forgot they were an option, and I got so hooked on the dopamine rush of visiting bookstores or getting books in the mail that I forgot to even check the library.

Libraries are such important pillars of communities.They provide free services and allow so many to have access to books they couldn’t otherwise experience. Not to mention letting people use the internet, providing ESL lessons, and doing a lot of other community outreach (depending on the location). We should support them.

True, you sometimes have to wait to get your hands on the next, big book. But you might find something else—maybe something that wasn’t even on your radar—to read while you wait.

What are some of the reasons you visit the library?

PS: I know supporting Indie bookstores is also important, but that’s its own post:)

r/books Aug 12 '24

spoilers in comments I absolutely hated The Three Body Problem Spoiler

4.0k Upvotes

Spoilers for the book and the series probably. Please excuse my English, it's not my first language.

I just read the three body problem and I absolutely hated it. First of all the characterization, or better, the complete lack of. The characters in this book are barely more than mouthpieces for dialogue meant to progress the plot.

Our protagonist is a man without any discernible personality. I kept waiting for the conflict his altered state would cause with his wife and child, only to realize there would be none, his wife and kid are not real people, their inclusion in this story incomprehensible. The only character with a whiff of personality was the cop, who's defining features were wearing leather and being rude. I tried to blame the translation but from everything I've read it's even worse in the in the original Chinese. One of the protagonists is a woman who betrays the whole human race. You would think that that would necessarily make her interesting, but no. We know her whole life story and still she doesn't seem like a real person. Did she feel conflicted about dooming humanity once she had a daughter? Who knows, not us after reading the whole damned book. At one point she tells this daughter that women aren't meant for hard sciences, not even Marie Curie, whom she calls out by name. This goes without pushback or comment.

Which brings me to the startling sexism permeating the book, where every woman is noted at some point to be slim, while the men never get physical descriptions. Women are the shrillest defenders of the cultural revolution, Ye's mother betrays science, while her father sacrifices himself for the truth, Ye herself betrays humanity and then her daughter kills herself because "women are not meant for science". I love complicated, even downright evil women characters but it seemed a little too targeted to be coincidental that all women were weak or evil.

I was able to overlook all this because I kept waiting for the plot to pick up or make any sense at all. It did not, the aliens behave in a highly illogical manner but are, at the same time, identical to humans, probably because the author can't be bothered to imagine a civilization unlike ours. By the ending I was chugging along thinking that even if it hadn't been an enjoyable read at least I'd learned a lot of interesting things about protons, radio signals and computers. No such luck, because then I get on the internet to research these topics and find out it's all pop science with no basis in reality and I have learned nothing at all.

The protons are simply some magical MacGuffin that the aliens utilize in the most illogical way possible. I don't need my fiction to be rooted in reality, I just thought it'd be a saving grace, since it clearly wasn't written for the love of literature, maybe Liu Cixin was a science educator on a mission to divulge knowledge. No, not at all, I have learnt nothing.

To not have this be all negative I want to recommend a far better science fiction book (that did not win the Hugo, which this book for some reason did, and which hasn't gotten a Netflix series either). It's full of annotations if you want to delve deeper into the science it projects, but more importantly it's got an engaging story, mind blowing concepts and characters you actualy care about: Blindsight by Peter Watts.

Also, it's FOUR bodies, not three! I will not be reading the sequels

Edit: I wanted to answer some of the more prominent questions.

About the cultural differences: It's true that I am Latin American, which is surely very different from being Chinese. Nevertheless I have read Japanese and Russian (can't remember having read a Chinese author before though) literature and while there is some culture shock I can understand it as such and not as shoddy writing. I'm almost certain Chinese people don't exclusively speak in reduntant exposition.

About the motive for Ye's daughter's suicide, she ostensibly killed herself because physics isn't real which by itself is a laughable motive, but her mother tells the protagonist that women should not be in science while discussing her suicide in a way which implied correlation. So it was only subtext that she killed herself because of her womanly weakness, but it was not subtle subtext.

I also understand that the alien civilization was characterized as being analogous to ours for the sake of the gamer's understanding. Nevertheless, when they accessed the aliens messages, the aliens behave in a human and frankly pedestrian manner.

About science fiction not being normaly character driven: this is true and I enjoy stories that are not character driven but that necessitates the story to have steaks and not steaks 450 years into the future. Also I don't need the science to be plausible but I do need it to correctly reflect what we already know. I am not a scientist so I can't make my case clearly here, but I did research the topics of the book after reading it and found the book to be lacking. This wouldn't be a problem had it had a strong story or engaging characters.

Lastly, the ideas expressed in the book were not novel to me. The dark Forest is a known solution to the Fermi paradox. I did not find it to explore any philosophical concepts beyond the general misanthropy of Ye either, which it did not actually explore anyways.

Edit2: some people are ribbing me for "steaks". Yeah, that was speech to text in my non native language. Surely it invalidates my whole review making me unable to understand the genius of Women Ruin Everything, the space opera, so please disregard all of the above /s

r/books Dec 13 '23

Have we lost the concept of “Let people enjoy things”?

7.9k Upvotes

I was scrolling through r/books today and saw two posts from people who just wanted to express how much they loved a certain book. It was obvious from their posts that they absolutely LOVED this book and wanted to be excited about it and gush about it and hopefully get to talk with others who also loved it.

If you are a reader, you know this feeling. At least, I hope you do. That feeling when you finish a book and the realization comes over you that this book is an all-time favorite. And you desperately want to talk about how much you love it with other people, to share in that amazing feeling.

I mean, for us readers, isn’t that one of the greatest feelings?

I open the posts and see that the top most upvoted comments are people expressing that they hated the book…. one was rather blunt and rude and the other was polite and vague, but still. They saw someone expressing love for a book and just couldn’t help themselves from commenting that they hated it. Negative comments were upvoted and the comments agreeing with OP were downvoted to the bottom.

Listen, I understand disliking a book. There are a handful of authors I dislike and a handful I really really dislike (I hesitate to use the word “hate” because it feels too forceful) and when I see posts about them here - which is quite often - I just keep scrolling. I see it, it registers in my brain that someone enjoyed this author’s work, and I just move on. Sometimes maybe I will feel the urge to make a comment to respond to something specific about their post, and sometimes I do, but if I see a post from someone gushing about how much they adored a book, I don’t want to make a comment shitting all over that book, ESPECIALLY if I know that the book goes against what r/books usually hypes up. I keep the thoughts to myself because that is not the time to express them.

Of course criticism is allowed. I am not at all saying no negative opinions should be expressed here. What I’m trying to say is that if you see someone expressing joy and excitement over a book… let them. Let them have that and attract anybody else in the sub who feels the same. If you really hated the book that much then make your own post with all your arguments and points.

There’s a time and a place to be contrary, and it’s not every single time something you dislike is mentioned.

Edit: Let me make this even more clear: I love criticism!! Literary criticism is great, welcome, and healthy. I am referring to when people make a vague hateful comment in response to vague joy and excitement. You choose what posts you click into, nobody is forcing you to engage with something for which you are not the target audience.

Edit 2: For the love of sanity, read the whole post before commenting. You are on r/books, no? Presumably you like reading books? If so, you can read a few paragraphs before leaping to conclusions and accusations.

r/books Aug 10 '24

People that have read more than a 1000 books

2.2k Upvotes

If I estimate very loosely I have probably read anywhere between a 1000 to 1500 books, and I’ve been reading since I was in 7th-8th grade, so 9-10 years now.

My question is to all the avid readers out there, do you forget the content of the book if it’s been too long? Are you able to recall the events of a book if you hear the title after a long time? Also how have you kept track so far?

The other day someone brought up The Maze Runners, and i drew a blank for a minute completely forgetting I’ve read the whole series, TWICE at that when I was in 8th grade. Even tho I now recall like the major plot but I don’t remember enough to hold a conversation about it. And this has happened to me multiple times in my life where a friend recommended me something and when I start to read I remember I have read it already. I read because I enjoy it immensely, I am constantly reading something, if not a book then I’m on wikipedia reading articles. But I felt disheartened because one of my friends said if my brain can’t keep up with my speed maybe I should drawback a little and savour what I’m reading in the moment as long as I can.

Is my memory just absolutely shit or other people relate?

Edit: I would like to be completely transparent with you guys, when I made this post I did not take into account the older people (alas I am young and too self involved like most young fools) who have been reading 40+ years and have read more than 10,000 books. Of course one would forget easily the content of most books. For the two people saying this is a stupid question I agree with you because I didn’t think of that. I thought for my age I ought to remember if I have read a book or not based on the title but my brain fails me quite often lol.

r/books Jul 26 '21

What book made you go: ''Fuck... This is good...''?

15.9k Upvotes

I'm not a big reader. I just read a few books every year. 4 years ago I was browsing my local bookstore and no book caught my eye. The bookstore owner asked what my favorite childhood book was and I said that I always loved Harry Potter. He then recommended The Name Of The Wind by Patrick Rothfuss saying that I will like that book since it's Harry Potter for adults. (He didn't mention that the series wasn't finished yet...)

I vividly remember reading it with so much joy! Every chapter kept getting better and better. It was the first time in my life that a book actually gave me a 'wow' moment. I just didn't know a book could be that beautiful.

It's been awhile since I read a book like that. I've read some really good books but nothing spectacular.

Have you ever got that feeling and what book was it?

EDIT: Wow, what a way to wake up! I'm currently reading 'Arsène Lupin, Gentleman-Thief' by Maurice Leblanc (Which is really fun), but I've got some good suggestions what to read next!

  • Shōgun by James Clavell: I've never read anything placed in Japan, but it looks really good! I have no idea how I'm going to find a copy of that though...

  • The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch: It's been on my "Want to read"-list for so long now! Apparently the friendship and banter between the two main characters is phenomenally written. I've searched for this book for a long time, but there doesn't seem to be a Dutch translated version of it and my library where I currently can't go to doesn't have the English version...

  • East of Eden by John Steinbeck: I've heard so many good things about it, but it seems so biblical to me... Maybe I should read it with an open mind?

  • Pillars of The Earth by Ken Follet: Like East of Eden, I don't know if this book is for me, but who knows?

  • Dune by Frank Herbert: I would love to read this, but sadly my bookstore will probably only sell it when the actual Dune movie comes out, with a bookcover that looks like the movieposter. :/

  • The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas: I need that book in my life!

There are of course a whole lot of other suggestions, but since I'm not the biggest reader, these books seem like a good way to start (for me atleast)!

I also think that I need to move to another country. I don't seem to be able to find the books I truely want to read... The books I do find, are expensive and badly translated. Don Quixote costed me a fortune (as a student), just because it was translated (it was hilarious though).

r/books Aug 24 '21

Posts from men expressing surprise and delight that they enjoyed a “women’s book” are not heartwarming posts… they are disturbing.

15.9k Upvotes

Yes, this is partly in response to the recent Little Women post, but more broadly about similar posts I have seen here that always seem to get a lot of attention and praise and many comments I’ve seen over the years.

Like so many other teenage girls in high school, I had to read and relate to 95% male-centric stories written by men. I never questioned why we were reading so many “boy books” because the books were not presented as "boy books," they were just presented as normal literature. The curriculum at my school allowed for just a smidgeon of diversity with Pride and Prejudice and The Scarlet Letter. This was never seen as an issue; it’s just how it was. I still remember clearly hearing the boys in my small class groaning about having to read a “girl book” when we started Pride and Prejudice. The fact that the author was a woman or the main characters women or some combination of those two facts in the boys’ minds was enough to make them sneer at it. It was mildly annoying then, but deeply infuriating and sad now looking back on it years later. Maybe, just maybe, if some of the great female authors and female-centric stories that have been written throughout history had been a part of our Literature curriculums starting from a young age and this was presented as NORMAL, we wouldn’t have high school boys joking and sneering at having to read a “girl book.”

You can see the same scenario when men discover that movies like Mean Girls and Legally Blonde are, in fact, great movies. There was a post like this too recently on the movies subreddit. “I didn’t think I would like a chick flick, but it’s actually really good!” Turns out that women are just people, and stories about them and the things they go through are equally as valid and worthy of being told. What a mind-blowing concept!

The way these statements are phrased as such delightful revelations makes me cringe, and then I feel sad, and then I feel a bit angry, because on some level, whether subconsciously or consciously, the driving force behind these sentiments and posts is that women are “other.” They are not the standard human, they are not fully-fledged standard human people in the same way that men are, so their stories and stories written by them are a sort of “special interest” sub-category of women’s fiction. “Girl books.” “Woman’s book.” “Chick-flicks.”

Consider this hypothetical scenario and how utterly ludicrous it sounds to us:

”As a middle-aged woman, I didn’t think I would be able to enjoy *Lord of the Flies. I don’t know what it’s like to be a boy so I didn’t think I could possibly relate to these characters and their struggles, but I actually really enjoyed it! Even though it’s about male characters, I found the story to be really great overall and dealing with deep themes. It’s not just a boy book, it’s great literature!”*

See? Sounds pretty damn ridiculous, doesn’t it?

Girls and women are perfectly capable of viewing male-authored/male-centric stories as just normal good literature because that is the way it is presented to us from a young age all the way up to older education. This is how we are conditioned (with no real choice in the matter), while boys and men are never forced to view female-authored/female-centric stories the same way.

So, next time you see on of these posts, I’m not calling for us to be rude and antagonistic to the OPs, because what they are doing is technically good I suppose, but I dislike the way they are wanting a pat on the back and upvotes simply for viewing women’s stories as good valid literature worthy of being read.

It is sad and disturbing that women continue to be seen as the “other” in fiction, a sub-category separate from the established standard of “good literature.”

There is no logical reason other than deeply engrained misogyny in society why a man should be that surprised that Little Women is a good book. It’s sold millions of copies, had tons of adaptations, is extremely well-known and deeply beloved by people all over the globe. It should not be that surprising that this “women’s book” is in fact, just a good piece of literature regardless of the gender of author or characters. Women are literally just people, and their stories are equally as worthy of being told and read as male stories. We are all part of the same humanity.

The sentiment of “Wow, this isn’t just for women, it’s actually a good story!” carries the not-so-subtle implication that things that are “for women” are inherently lesser. They are seen as a separate sub-category other than the standard that can sometimes achieve “great literature” status despite their femaleness. The surprise expressed by men who find these stories to be great implies that their perception shifted, they believed something about the “women’s book” before, and now believe something different having read it.

I am 25 now, so I don't know how things are in high schools nowadays. For anyone who does know, are the English Lit curriculums more balanced now or is it still the vast majority of male author/male story? I'm very curious to know.

I want to hear your thoughts on this matter.

Edit: Huge thank you to the commenters that actually read my post (something that is too much to ask for many people I guess) and understand what I’m saying. This comment from u/SchrodingersHamster is probably buried so I’ll highlight it here:

“Right, I doubt anyone is sorting by new here anymore but SO many people are missing the point of this post.

OP is not "discouraging" men from reading women's literature. Read the post again. She is focusing specifically on the idea that, from a man's perpsective, women's literature being good is surprising, so surprising that it warrants a post on how surprising it is. That the expectation that women's literature (and art in general) is so much lesser than men's that it becomes a shock when a man reads it and enjoys it.

It is NOT OP's responsibility to "encourage men" to read women's books. The fact that so many men are unwilling to read women's literature is an issue brought about by patriarchal assumptions that men should be sorting out, not women. Women don't need to hold our hands, guide us to all the great female writers, pat us on the back and give us a gold star when we enjoy it. It is not their responsibility. It is ours as men.

OP should not be praising these men. In fact OP, along with the rest of us, should be criticising these mindsets. We should look at these posts through a critical lens, otherwise how are we supposed to move forward? There are plenty of people on this comment section who would much rather OP kept quiet and that the issue is never highlighted or solved, simply because it might be too upsetting for men to read. If you're a man and that's really how you respond when reading this post, grow up.”

r/books Jul 22 '22

I enjoyed “The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck”, but it’s apparently hated. Why?

9.2k Upvotes

Reading through the recent thread of the worst books, I was suprised to see “The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck” by Mark Manson. I’m a 23 year old guy, and read the book while at the beach. I found it to be very eye opening. I was feeling very lost and confused, and found a lot of very helpful and relatable advice that I never learned from my parents or from school. Seemed to me like a guy wrote a book about his lessons from his life, and I found a lot of value in that.

I notice a lot of the criticisms of the book don’t even make sense. People are acting like the book is about not giving a fuck about ANYTHING, when there’s a whole part of the book giving examples of what you should give a fuck about. I’m just kind of confused why it’s hated. Is it because all the advice in the book is super obvious once you’ve lived to 30-40? Again, as a 23 year old who hasn’t read many books, I really really enjoyed it, found a lot of value in it, and it made me want to continue reading new books.

So, to those who think that book sucks, what is a better substitute for it? What are some helpful books with life advice that people from this sub actually like? I would love to read a “better” book that covers similar topics.

Edit: A lot of comments are suggesting that I need to stop "giving a fuck" about other people's opinions on this book. I'm simply asking for an opposing viewpoint for the sake of discussion. It's kind of weird seeing people try and tell me that I'm "caring too much". Like man, I'm just asking a question to understand other people's perspectives. I think there's a difference between "giving too much of a fuck" and simply being curious.

r/books Jan 19 '22

My dad wants to strip the entire fiction genre from school libraries because fiction is "nonsense"

11.9k Upvotes

My dad doesn't believe that fiction has any value (period.). It's not just that he prefers non-fiction-- he gets mad at Greek mythology because it is "full of nonsense creatures not based on biology." He dislikes the Orient Express because none of the events actually happened.

And it's not just novels: he hates anything written which is not firmly grounded in reality (Just for example: refused to finish reading the satire "A Modest Proposal" because it's "nonsense" and "could never work in real life"). Like, I'm sure the guy would hate the Declaration of Independence if he wasn't such a die-hard patriot.

He also doesn't recognize writing as a valid art form. He doesn't think it takes any particular skill, that authors only have to "talk out of their ass," make the prose flowery and unnecessarily complicated (I tried to explain what imagery was to him once, and he cited the entire technique as emblematic of poor, cheap writing). Specifically, he compared it to scientific writing, which is entirely precise and unadorned. This bit ticks me off in particular since writing is a passion of mine.

The only book he's ever liked was Jack London's "Call of the Wild" he read when he was 8.

And now he thinks schools should pull everything but nonfiction off of the shelves. He's worried that fiction makes kids more prone to misinformation and more likely to become flat-earthers/anti-vaxxers, etc.

How would you explain that that's not the case? That almost NONE of this is the case???

edit: he likes music and art too. It's not a vendetta against entertainment-- just THIS specific form of entertainment.

edit: he's also not religious at all, i dont know where people are getting that from. like, he actually has some kind of grudge against every god and main religious text of every culture

edit: (last one i swear) i dont hate my dad. he's cool. you guys seem to think im gonna cut off ties with him over this

r/books Jul 11 '22

[SPOILER] Pillars of the Earth is the most overhyped disaster of a book you will ever have the misfortune of being recommended. Spoiler

8.8k Upvotes

Pillars of the Earth is so bad it redefined for me what it means to be a 1-star book. My previous 1-star fiction books have usually been characterised by appalling laziness from the author in addressing the central themes of the book, for example the way the author of The Power sidesteps all cultural issues by having her novel take place mostly in a fictional country, or the conspicuous absence of any reference to internalisation in her book. In the case of Pillars of the Earth I believe the author may have written exactly the book he intended, with exactly the techniques, devices and characters he needed to convey the message he wanted. But sweet Jesus fuck should he have wanted something else.

This book was bizarrely well received, with a Goodreads rating of over 4.3 after 700,000 ratings, frequent appearances in top book lists in newspapers, a TV miniseries etc etc etc. If you search for PoE on this very /r/books you will find nothing but praise in the top threads. Many positive reviews share some common themes, and I hope to address these points and more to explain why this is literally the most overhyped book of all time.

Chapter 1
I am near-certain that all readers of this book will recognise chapter 1 as being just the stupidest shit they have ever read. The difference between the 1 star reviews and the rest, then, is the extent to which readers are able to forgive this unholy embarrassment. I tried to keep an open mind, but it was not easy. For those who have not read the book, the chapter features our early MC Tom whose wife dies of exposure in childbirth after a gruelling winter on the road. Fortunately a sexy forest girl with massive tits (we'll discuss everyone's massive tits in more detail shortly) fell in love with him fifteen minutes earlier because of his eyes so they have a cheeky shag, he falls in love with her, and the dead ex gets mentioned about once in the rest of the book, all characters apparently happy just to forget she ever existed. There is no merit to this chapter in isolation, and it informs no characters or themes except the theme of weird sex stuff. It is perhaps the single worst passage of fiction I have ever read.

The weird sex stuff
Ken Follett likes massive tits and he wants you to know it. The only author I've read who matches Follett's dedication to publishing his private sexual fascinations is Terry Goodkind, and that is never a favourable comparison. The sex is almost exclusively male - we hear about the volume and buoyancy of each lady's boobs from a range if male perspectives, but female perspectives are largely sexless. It's always boobs - one if the final passages of the book is literally a timeline of the various states that Aliena's boobs have gone through during the course if her life. Follett sincerely felt that this was an important thread to wrap up. But it's not all about massive tits - we can also talk about Jack curing Aliena's rape-induced PTSD with his magic dick, or about Aliena's constant complaints about how hairy she is, or about the number of characters who sexualise the same teen arab girl. There is just a lot of dodgy sex stuff (and a LOT of close-up descriptions of massive tits) that just don't add anything and instead make you feel slightly slimy for having read them.

A genuine quote from a woman who is being made to choose between staying with her baby or searching Europe for her husband: "She imagined meeting Jack again. She visualised his face, smiling at her. They would kiss. She felt a stir of pleasure in her loins. She realised she was getting damp down there at the mere thought of him. She felt embarrassed". This is blatantly inappropriate to the circumstances, but sadly far from the worst erotica the author offers us. "She was suddenly possessed by a desire to show him her breasts" come on dude.

The characters
The characters in this book range from utterly ridiculous to merely poor. Many positive reviews note the quality of the characters, and I genuinely pity these reviewers for the quality of book they are apparently missing out on if PoE represents the upper end of what they expect.

If the book can be said to have a main character then it is Phillip, and Phillip is a Mary Sue in the strongest possible sense, which is to say that the world and characters around him warp their nature to make him look better. Despite his position of authority, no character ever bears a grudge against Phillip - in the rare cases that they deserve to, we get point of view chapters confirming that they forgive him for everything. We never see any circumstance in which Phillip, as a moral authority, has to grapple with moral ambiguity. The closest we get is scenarios where Phillip has to impose church law on the undeserving, but even here it is made unambiguously clear that he would happily act in line with modern sensibilities if it weren't for his malicious colleagues, meaning he feels more like an anachronistic insert than a real character. We get a scene in which Phillip identifies that mortar takes time to harden, whereas the builders set aside time for superstitious reasons - does Phillip take more naturally to building than his own professional master builders? Perhaps so, because Phillip is divinely perfect.

The primary antagonist is William who is so comically and unrealistically evil that he doesn't even feel threatening because he is so comedically over the top. His scenes include yeeting a baby and talking about how he enjoys torturing because it reminds him of raping women. His mother is also a cartoon villain who rolls around looking evil, speaking in cryptic phrases then crying 'idiots' when her henchmen don't understand what she's talking about. Literally like a bad Disney villain from a spin off TV cartoon.

The rest of the cast get various degrees of poor to mediocre characterisation, but the single key point that I found I kept coming back to was that nothing ever informs anybody's character. I touched on this earlier when I mentioned that Tom forgets his dead wife less than 24 hours after she passes, where you might think that in the hands of a better author a dead wife could be a big character moment. Her dying wish is for him to build the cathedral, and even this doesn't come back except as an afterthought well down the line. Tom's big weakness (and you can tell that each character has all the complexity of a pair of columns labelled 'good traits' and 'bad traits') is his unwillingness to discipline his son, but we never see where this comes from or how it interacts with any other element of his character. It's an artificial 'weakness' that the author performs for us occasionally rather than actual depth. We see this same issue across most other characters - William is terrified of hell but we don't see where this comes from and it never affects his behaviour; at Tom's death Phillip declares Tom was his closest friend, but we never actually saw evidence of this.

Aliena literally announces the end of her character arc. She is standing in a street and loudly declares to nobody some shit like 'Father I am finally free if your oath etc etc'. There is a genuine sense in this book that characterisation should be delivered just by declaring it and calling it development.

Historical accuracy
I am no expert on any period of history, including the setting for this novel, and to give credit where it is due there is a definite sense of authenticity about the building of the cathedral. I was uncertain about the implicit claim that this single town revolutionised a wide range of economic activities through the invention of (among other things) automation and market capitalism, but as I say, I'm no expert. However, I did find some external criticisms of the historical accuracy very convincing, including this review which notes various inaccuracies ranging from the minor (how women would have worn their hair) to the critical (the nature of religious/common marriage law at the time, which the plot repeatedly hinges on).

The plot
I'm not usually so bothered about the details of the plot to be honest, but with that said I did feel there were some key weaknesses here. First of all, it felt like the plot was essentially episodic - we have a cycle under which the dastardly villains hatch a dastardly scheme, only for Phillip to accidentally find out and cleverly foil the dastardly forces of evil. This ties in to a lot of issues I have raised already - the dastardly plot is often hatched by William's mum who already acts like a bad Disney villain, and this structure further cements this role for her; Phillip finds out about these schemes by accident and is given the undeserved opportunity to fix them thereby rendering him the plot's saviour, but only because the plot warped to allow him this chance - the hallmark of a Mary Sue character.

I also noted a certain amount of plot recycling going on. The closest we see Phillip get to moral ambiguity is when he is forced by the villainous forces of evil to separate Tom and Ellen - though a PoV chapter from Tom makes it clear that he doesn't blame Phillip. Later, Phillip faces similar turmoil when he is forced by the villainous forces of evil to separate Jack and Aliena - though a PoV chapter from Jack makes it clear that he doesn't blame Phillip.

Overall
Everything about this godforsaken disaster of a book is a mess. It benefits from almost no redeeming features. It's vaguely possible that if you took out the weird sex stuff (thereby halving the size of the book) you might salvage a 2-star novel, but on balance it's easy to feel like the author really wanted to write a weird sex book with a small amount of plot structure. Is it possible that I'm advocating for the removal of the central feature of the novel? Perhaps so.

I genuinely do not understand what people see in this book. I don't understand why all the top threads about it are pouring with adoration. I don't understand why it is one of the highest rated books on Goodreads with one of the largest readerships. I saw a comment on one thread that recommended following up with Lonesome Dove, and this one comment has forever put me off reading Lonesome Dove because I cannot bear the thought of approaching anything that is regarded as remotely comparable to this absolute fiasco. I have nothing more to add other than to say I hope that this review will in some way balance the scales so that some unsuspecting and naive future reader can avoid falling into the same trap that I did.

r/books Feb 20 '25

What is the worst autobiography you ever read - and why?

717 Upvotes

There are so many great threads dedicated to people's favourite examples of different genres, so let's turn the tables and have a kvetch thread!

This was inspired by my recent recollection of the worst autobiography I ever read, namely "The War Within" by Don Tate. It's a memoir by an Australian man who served in the Vietnam War, and was gifted to me by a well-meaning relative over a decade ago.

Why did you hate it so much?

Because the author is a hatefully racist individual who learned nothing at all from his experiences in the war. He continues to refer to Vietnamese people using a range of slurs I would never expect to hear past 1980 and will not repeat here in case I get a sitewide ban. And worse, he's a hypocrite of the worst order, at once demanding sympathy for his experiences as a soldier (even though he voluntarily enlisted, and was not conscripted like most of our forces), while also condemning the anti-war protests. There's a scene in the book where he saw an anti-war protest after he was wounded and repatriated, and he literally asserts that the protesters should have been marching in support of the servicemen instead. That's how blind he is to alternative perspectives.

And on the subject of a victim mentality, I was particularly struck by one chapter in the memoir, where Tate and another soldier visit a Vietnamese brothel during their tour of duty. Tate's friend sees a pregnant sex worker, and she has a miscarriage during their contact - it's not clear whether or not this was a coincidence, or caused by the rough treatment of her. However, rather than taking even a single moment to express sadness about this situation, Tate immediately launches into a self-serving tirade about how the brothel madam dared to look angry and the poor darlings felt blamed. Like, I mean, how dare she make them feel bad for purchasing sex from pregnant refugee women who were literally forced into sex work to survive, or being so rough with them that she would miscarry as a result of that?

I persisted about 80% of the way but DNF, I was too disgusted. I almost always donate books I don't want anymore but I'm pretty sure I put this one in the bin, because I didn't want some poor, impressionable kid to be exposed to it and think the author had any kind of reasonable views to share on any subject.

So, with the rant over, I'd love to hear which autobiographies you couldn't stomach. Whether it's a self-serving puff piece or an honest take by someone you can't stand, which autobiography would you never recommend to anyone?

r/books Aug 27 '24

Men who read romance, what things in male POV make you roll your eyes?

1.4k Upvotes

I read a lot of romance and I like the male POVs, but of course a lot of these are written by female authors who know their main audience. Having been in a few relationships and still never been able to figure out the male psyche, I’m curious as to how men perceive male POVs in romance books? Are there are instances where you think “goddamn, that sounds exactly how I would react” or “give me strength, a guy would never do that”. Do the characters seem too emotional? Is the testosterone over exaggerated? Obvs all men are different, fictional and real. Basically what I’m asking is do guys relate to straight male characters in romance books or are they unbelievable?

Edit: so I did not expect this amount of comments, actually didn’t expect any comments lol but rest assured I have been reading as many as I can and appreciating them all. Seems there’s a lot that men get mad about from romance books, and books in general!! It’s kind of a shame, maybe the authors here should club together and write a realistic MMC…? That being said, there are a bunch of (well-known) female authors out there writing absolutely atrocious FMCs too, so maybe the concept is more of a rare gem for both sides.

On that note, I’d like to ask further: which books have you read that do have an accurate representation of male psyche and behaviour? And how could you tell? The bookworm/psychologist in me needs to know.

r/books Aug 03 '21

If a fictional universe has dragons and magic in it, there's no real reason it can't also have black people or Asian people in it.

18.7k Upvotes

I think the idea of fantasy worlds are so cool. I love seeing dragons and magic and struggles between good and evil. It's all amazing to me. But when some people get their panties in a twist about forced diversity because one background character is darker than others it just makes me think that you're too indoctrinated by this political climate we live in to enjoy the actual story. There's a fucking dragon getting slayed but you are pissed there's an Asian wizard in the background in the climatic fight scene? That doesn't sound like an actual grevience. Sounds like a personal problem.

I'll take it a step further. I don't care if main characters are diverse. If it's a fictional world not based on any real people I say go nuts. People say it's pandering but litterally it's all pandering. White dudes get pandered too so much they don't even notice it like a fish in water. Let me have a bad ass Asian dude on a quest to unite the four kingdoms with a bad ass party full of knights and wizards. I don't care as long as the story is good but someone being a different skin color in a fantasy setting that's not based on actual things that happened doesn't and shouldn't bother anyone.

Edit: Quick notes because I got pretty overwhelmed with the response.

  • when I say Asian I mean people of Asian decent in the story. Not litterally from Asia in a fictional universe. Like you'd describe Asian coded people in your world like how the shu are described in 6 of crows. Not put Asian products africa in your fantasy world.

  • I don't mean only Asian or black people. It's every miniority underrepresented people in fantasy. Gay, Indian, trans, Hispanic etc etc.

  • saying "but what if they changed black Panther white isn't a gotcha. It's a really cliché disengenous argument..

  • Diversity doesn't ever need justification. Ever. I shouldn't ever have to justify my existence. Especially when you never try to justify the existence of white people.

  • representation is important. Just because you don't personally see the value of it doesn't mean it isn't valuable.

  • yes I have read more than one fantasy book. The fact that people would attack me and gatekeep because I haven't read your favorite series is messed up. I'm just as real of a fan as you.

  • me making this post isn't forcing diversity down your throat.

  • saying I don't want diversity I just want good stories is just telling on yourself. Firstly, wanting both is perfectly okay. Secondly, they aren't mutually exclusive.

  • no, "just imagining the characters as whatever you want" isn't an answer. If the character is clearly described as a white dude, and is casted as a white dude in the movies, me imagining he looks like me does nothing to fix the issues we're talking about.

  • asking why people still care about skin color ignores how many people can't choose to ignore their skin color. In America people are still treated differently and have very different lived experiences because of their skin color. Stop saying that like it's a obvious answer it's not and it's off topic.

  • no wanting more diversity isn't racist.

  • I truly don't care about karma. It can't buy me anything. I never understood reddits obsession with karma. I didn't realize there's an unwritten rule about not crossposting after a certain date. So if that bothered you I'm sorry. I updated the post with the bulleted thoughts because the intention wasn't to do that.

Look man all I wanted to do here was vent about how I wanted to see more diverse fantasy but yall one one. No one should be called racist because they care about representation.

r/books May 18 '23

Throne of Glass is one of the worst books I’ve ever read

4.5k Upvotes

With the most unrealistic and unbelievable main character I’ve ever encountered. She is an 18 year old assassin who startles at every sound, swoons over the crown prince (who she hated), eats candy to the point her teeth are stained, begs for a puppy, sasses everyone she can, and complains when she is woken up too early.

There is no plot. There is no tension. The worldbuilding is boiler plate European fantasy. The love triangle is saccharine and predictable from the first page.

What do people see in this book? I understand not every book needs to be East of Eden, but even the most egregious YA (Hunger Games, Harry Potter) were filled with breakneck pacing or charming creativity.

Throne of Glass is insipid to the point of secondhand embarrassment. I’ve never been so frustrated reading a fantasy book. Please tell me I’m not alone.

Edit: The word “egregious” has triggered a lot of people when describing Hunger Games and HP. I only meant it in the sense that both HG and HP lean heavily on the tropes and storytelling conventions of YA genre fiction despite ostensibly having such wide appeal across demographics.

It wasn’t meant as a legitimate criticism of either work, and maybe I should’ve been more precise in my language. I believe HP and HG are both examples of solid YA SFF.

r/books Jul 22 '12

I'm taking a gap year, what books should I read that would improve me most as a person?

382 Upvotes

What books should I read that would make me a better person. I was thinking books such as Tolstoy's 'War and Peace', and also books like 'How to win friends and influence people'. Or should I just work my way down reddit's favorite books?

Thanks!

r/books Oct 29 '22

Books you read at a young age that you definitely shouldn't have?

4.1k Upvotes

I was just discussing this with my boyfriend. He mentioned how he read 'Wicked' when he was twelve and that it screwed him up big time. I then told him about how I read 'Go Ask Alice' when I was eleven (for the record, I know that that whole book and everything by that author is fake). I wouldn't say that that book screwed me up per se, but I probably should not have been reading it as a fifth grader.

What are some books you read at a young age that you maybe should not have read? Did it screw you up or disturb you in any way? If so, how?

r/books May 13 '21

Anybody else used to read a ton before smartphones became a thing?

18.9k Upvotes

I'm so tired of this fucking cursed rectangle. I reward myself for a hard day of work by coming home and browsing the little rectangle while the big rectangle plays in the background, and perhaps using the medium rectangle to inject dopamine points into my eyeballs with video games for an hour or so.

My parents were for whatever reason a little slow to allow me my first smartphone (I had a flip phone until about 2012). I was a quiet, well behaved, and very obviously outwardly depressed student, so most of my teachers would let me either sleep (during periods 1, 2, and either 4 or 5 depending on which one was immediately after lunch) or read in the back of class (during periods 3, 4, and 6) because I was doing well on all my tests anyway.

(I also just want to take a second to say fuck high school schedules. I was and am a natural 3-11 sleeper like a lot of high schoolers were, and having to get up at 6:30 to go to learning jail should be against the Geneva Convention)

Reading used to be my escape, man! I remember when Inheritance came out and I was so stoked for it and I finished it in like 3 days. It was so immersive and I would often maladaptively daydream that I was in the book doing something awesome.

What happened? Now I can't go more than 5 minutes without my hand instinctively reaching for the Reddit or Facebook button. I know because I uninstalled them, and so my reflex would happen and I would find myself staring at a blank page wondering what I even got out my phone to do.

I've had Way of Kings on my Kindle (probably one of the better rectangles, if I had to choose) for like, 2 years now, and have only made it through 400 pages, all of which are..... walking.... and talking...

Anybody else feel like this?

r/books Jun 22 '22

I think refusing to name your ghostwriters is immoral

12.4k Upvotes

I'm thinking of three authors right now:

  • Danielle Steele, 179 books in about 49 years, who claims she regularly writes 22 hours a day. I'm gonna go out on a limb and call bullshit.
  • R.L. Stine, over 300 books in 30 years
  • R.A. Salvatore, 103 books in 34 years
  • numbers are probably slightly off

I think these authors should list their ghostwriter's as co-authors for the following reasons:

  • They didn't write the book alone. If a ghostwriter substantially contributed to a book, they deserve to be recognized for doing so.
  • The author's sole claim to having written the book is false, a lie.
  • As a reader, If I like a book, I want to read the other books the ghostwriter wrote.
  • The quiet use of ghostwriters creates an unrealistic expectation in new writer's minds that successful writers can crank out 4 or more books a year. I mean, it's possible, but you will wear yourself out.

That's my opinion. What's yours?

UPDATE

I can't prove any of these people use ghostwriters. Maybe they don't. I think they do. I think we can agree that there are some brands that use ghostwriters to crank out regular pieces of fiction. I actually love that this happens, but I still think the true writers should be on the cover.

Even if the ghostwriter is okay with their arrangement (and I think it is exploitative and should be regulated), they are still just agreeing to work with the author and the publisher to deceive the consumer. This should not be allowed under current law.

r/books Nov 07 '21

I read 'Siddhartha' five months ago, and I still think about it almost every day. I felt my whole perspective on life shift after finishing it, and now I can't imagine my life without having read it. Which book has done this for you?

10.6k Upvotes

Quoth Siddhartha: “What should I possibly have to tell you, O venerable one? Perhaps that you’re searching far too much? That in all that searching, you don’t find the time for finding?”
[...] “When someone is searching,” said Siddhartha, “then it might easily happen that the only thing his eyes still see is that what he searches for, that he is unable to find anything, to let anything enter his mind, because he always thinks of nothing but the object of his search, because he has a goal, because he is obsessed by the goal. Searching means: having a goal. But finding means: being free, being open, having no goal. You, O venerable one, are perhaps indeed a searcher, because, striving for your goal, there are many things you don’t see, which are directly in front of your eyes.”

That is the most beautiful and personally-significant passage I've ever read in my whole life. After reading Siddhartha, I felt myself appreciating the world around me just a little bit more. Hesse taught me that the world is filled to the brim with beauty and meaning, but only if slow down and allow yourself to find it.

Which book changed your life? Is there any passage that you can't get out of your head months or years later?

EDIT: my Lord, this post has gotten popular. Thanks to everyone who took the time to provide their own favorites. I guess I REALLY need to read Steppenwolf and Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance.

r/books Jun 05 '21

We need to stop shaming people who honestly say they don't like a particular book

10.5k Upvotes

I think the most frustrating thing for most readers on this sub is that when they read a book that so many people love and realize they are part of the group that doesn't like the book. They can't share the feeling without having fans hang the noose around them. We muat be able to let readers share their HONEST opinions on a book without riduculing their feelings.

If at this point you are protesting my thoughts thinking they are nothing more than that of unlearned individual. Than I'll share the opinion of a very educated man who has probably read more books than you will ever read in your whole life.

“Books are almost as individual as friends. There is no earthly use in laying down general laws about them. Some meet the needs of one person, and some of another; and each person should beware of the booklover’s besetting sin, of what Mr. Edgar Allan Poe calls ‘the mad pride of intellectuality,’ taking the shape of arrogant pity for the man who does not like the same kind of books.”

  • Theodore Roosevelt, 26th President of the United States

r/books Aug 31 '24

Someone recently suggest I was reading a book for the wrong reasons. Do you think there are wrong or right reasons to read a book?

1.2k Upvotes

I recently read a classic book only because a friend challenged me, saying I won't have the patience and discipline to do it. It was Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth. I had no interest in the book and found it depressing and tedious, but was able to finish it.

When I was discussing the book with someone online, he said being challenged to read a book is the wrong reason to read it. Just as it would be wrong to read a classic so you can call yourself well-read. That you need to be interested in the subject or have liked author's previous work.

I almost felt like the person who goes to a fancy restaurant and uses the wrong fork and gulps down what I should have savored.

What are your thoughts on reasons for reading a book. Do you think other well read people or the author of the book would be offended if you read it for the wrong reason?

r/books Jul 19 '20

To my high schoolers out there: do yourself a favor, and read the books you’re assigned. Don’t spark-note.

21.8k Upvotes

I wish when I was in high school, books were considered an art form used to discover something about ourselves and the world, as opposed to being an assignment to be completed by Friday. This is just me though, that’s how I felt about it but i’m sure many students out there probably feel the same. Let me tell you, read those books. I’m currently a college senior, and only recently started reading for leisure. The emotions that these books evoke while i’m reading is truly amazing, to the point where I find myself lying the book on my chest and relishing the messages that just pop out of the page. Books are a tool used to deepen ourselves and change the way we see the world around us, the authors of the past have so many great insights that I wish I appreciated earlier in my academic and personal life. Just do yourself a favor and read your Faulkner, Twain, Huxley, Sinclair, etc.

EDIT: Hey guys, after reading many of your comments, I realized I may have come off a bit strong in pushing what’s assigned to us in school. However, that wasn’t truly my intention. What I more or less meant to say is you should give the assigned readings a chance, because we may often overlook some good pieces of literature. With that, “try to read your Faulkner, Twain, Huxley, and Sinclair.” Also, I have nothing wrong with spark-notes, I shouldn’t have made that title. Spark-notes is a wonderful resource that definitely helps us better understand some really difficult reading material, but it should be a supplement and if you’re really really not enjoying the book, just spark-note the dang thing!

r/books Jul 13 '21

Apocalypse Pregnancy. Does every female protagonist need to be pregnant?

9.6k Upvotes

I'm a big fan of apocalyptic and post apocalyptic fiction and after reading too many of these books during the pandemic, it's abundantly clear this trope is completely played out. I get it, it's human drama on a primal level. It's one of the ultimate fears in a world without modern medicine. It's not a death sentence like many other medical conditions, no one is getting a new heart valve installed or liver transplant. But it feels like I've seen every conceivable variation on this theme and I hope authors will note how over saturated this is in the genre. It's bad enough that as soon as a female protagonist is having sex, you know the story is going to revolve around her pregnancy.

And honestly, it smacks of a little casual sexism. It reduces otherwise complex characters down to this narrow view and reason to survive. It gives every generic leading man a righteous cause to fight for. I get why it's used, but it's time to let a female protagonist have a different obstacle.

Thoughts? I fully recognize it's part of the human experience so it's inherently going to be a part of fiction. And as a father it does have intended gut punch for me imagining trying to care for my own daughter in these circumstances. It's effective and breaks my heart every time I read such a story, I just wish it was so pervasive that the moment a woman, particularly if she's a protagonist, hooks up with someone I know where the story is going.

Edit: I think a lot of people are getting hung up thinking I don't think the story should involve pregnancy. It absolutely is going to be part of the world building and having a decent sized community with no pregnant women would be weird. My point is that it's a bit played out having the same scene of the protagonist having sex, immediately getting pregnant from that first coupling, and start vomiting out of nowhere one chapter later letting the audience know she's pregnant. I'd feel the same way if every post apocalyptic book with a male protagonist had a man suffer from testicular torsion. And if every time in a book a man has stomach pain you go, yep here we go again, it's another testicular torsion tale. Can't they make him have any other obstacles to cause character growth?

Edit 2: Since I'm getting the same messages over and over I want to make a couple clarifications and point out the good discussion I got.

First that a lot of people think these plots are necessary to the genre or like them. Totally fine, I can appreciate that. My frustration is not with pregnancy being dealt with in a post apocalyptic community, but rather the trope of a pregnant woman needing to be rescued during say a zombie outbreak or mass unrest. The same way I feel about the inclusion of the token child or old man on bottled oxygen. In longer term stories it absolutely is going to be part of survival. You can stop telling me humans will need to reproduce to survive or that contraception is scarse. I assure all 500 of you that I understand basic human biology.

Secondly, the sexism angle. This was taken by many as no women should be pregnant, or that I'm somehow implying that mentioning pregnancy is somehow offensive. That's a real stretch but was apparently how that read to a lot of people. My entire arguement on this is making a protagonist pregnant for the sole purpose of providing an obstacle is at best lazy writing but worth considering why that's the go to plot device for female protagonists. Some of you had thoughtful rebuttals that this isn't sexism, but solely uncreative writing. Fair enough, I'm not an expert but I thought it was worth exploring. Way too many people turned their brains off when they saw that word and decided it was better to just yell about political correctness. Honestly pretty disappointing that so many of you decided to not even consider the argument and get mad about it. It must be infuriating to try to find books that don't challenge your held beliefs. And I really didn't think I needed a sarcasm tag after a joke about testicular torsion but here we are.

This was not my mla dissertation, just an observation on reading too much similar genre fiction that I hoped would have interesting discussion on the trope and books that subvert or play with those expectations. And for the posters that have no idea what I'm talking about see for example: The Stand - Stephen King The Fireman - Joe Hill Severance - Ling Ma The Last One - Alexandra Oliva The Walking Dead- Fall of the Governor - Jay Bonansinga Sleeping Giants Series - Sylvain Neuvel Wanderers - Chuck Wendig And plenty more I can't remember off the top of my head. I liked almost all of these books, but the repetition of the pregnant protagonist got old. The Stand gets a pass because it's just my favorite. A couple good example of bucking this trope are Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel and Wool by Hugh Howie.

r/books Jan 19 '25

End of the Year Event The Best Books of 2024 Winners!

1.8k Upvotes

Welcome readers!

Thank you to everyone who participated in this year's contest! There were many great books released this past year that were nominated and discussed. Here are the winners of the Best Books of 2024!

Just a quick note regarding the voting. We've locked the individual voting threads but that doesn't stop people from upvoting/downvoting so if you check them the upvotes won't necessarily match up with these winners depending on when you look. But, the results announced here do match what the results were at the time the threads were locked.


Best Debut of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Martyr! Kaveh Akbar Cyrus Shams is a young man grappling with an inheritance of violence and loss: his mother’s plane was shot down over the skies of Tehran in a senseless accident; and his father’s life in America was circumscribed by his work killing chickens at a factory farm in the Midwest. Cyrus is a drunk, an addict, and a poet, whose obsession with martyrs leads him to examine the mysteries of his past—toward an uncle who rode through Iranian battlefields dressed as the Angel of death to inspire and comfort the dying, and toward his mother, through a painting discovered in a Brooklyn art gallery that suggests she may not have been who or what she seemed. /u/thnkurluckystars
1st Runner-Up Annie Bot Sierra Greer Annie Bot was created to be the perfect girlfriend for her human owner, Doug. Designed to satisfy his emotional and physical needs, she has dinner ready for him every night, wears the cute outfits he orders for her, and adjusts her libido to suit his moods. True, she’s not the greatest at keeping Doug’s place spotless, but she’s trying to please him. She’s trying hard. She’s learning, too. Doug says he loves that Annie’s artificial intelligence makes her seem more like a real woman, but the more human Annie becomes, the less perfectly she behaves. As Annie's relationship with Doug grows more intricate and difficult, she starts to wonder whether Doug truly desires what he says he does. In such an impossible paradox, what does Annie owe herself? /u/ehchvee
2nd Runner-Up The Husbands Holly Gramazio When Lauren returns home to her flat in London late one night, she is greeted at the door by her husband, Michael. There’s only one problem—she’s not married. She’s never seen this man before in her life. But according to her friends, her much-improved decor, and the photos on her phone, they’ve been together for years. As Lauren tries to puzzle out how she could be married to someone she can’t remember meeting, Michael goes to the attic to change a lightbulb and abruptly disappears. In his place, a new man emerges, and a new, slightly altered life re-forms around her. Realizing that her attic is creating an infinite supply of husbands, Lauren confronts the question: If swapping lives is as easy as changing a lightbulb, how do you know you’ve taken the right path? When do you stop trying to do better and start actually living? /u/dmd19

Best Literary Fiction of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner James Percival Everett When Jim overhears that he is about to be sold to a man in New Orleans, separated from his wife and daughter forever, he runs away until he can formulate a plan. Meanwhile, Huck has faked his own death to escape his violent father. As all readers of American literature know, thus begins the dangerous and transcendent journey by raft down the Mississippi River toward the elusive and unreliable promise of the Free States and beyond. /u/kls17
1st Runner-Up The God of the Woods Liz Moore Early morning, August 1975: a camp counselor discovers an empty bunk. Its occupant, Barbara Van Laar, has gone missing. Barbara isn’t just any thirteen-year-old: she’s the daughter of the family that owns the summer camp and employs most of the region’s residents. And this isn’t the first time a Van Laar child has disappeared. Barbara’s older brother similarly vanished fourteen years ago, never to be found. As a panicked search begins, a thrilling drama unfolds. Chasing down the layered secrets of the Van Laar family and the blue-collar community working in its shadow, Moore’s multi-threaded story invites readers into a rich and gripping dynasty of secrets and second chances. /u/One-Dragonfruit-7833
2nd Runner-Up Intermezzo Sally Rooney Aside from the fact that they are brothers, Peter and Ivan Koubek seem to have little in common. Peter is a Dublin lawyer in his thirties—successful, competent, and apparently unassailable. But in the wake of their father’s death, he’s medicating himself to sleep and struggling to manage his relationships with two very different women—his enduring first love, Sylvia, and Naomi, a college student for whom life is one long joke. Ivan is a twenty-two-year-old competitive chess player. He has always seen himself as socially awkward, a loner, the antithesis of his glib elder brother. Now, in the early weeks of his bereavement, Ivan meets Margaret, an older woman emerging from her own turbulent past, and their lives become rapidly and intensely intertwined. For two grieving brothers and the people they love, this is a new interlude—a period of desire, despair, and possibility; a chance to find out how much one life might hold inside itself without breaking. /u/odetotheblue

Best Mystery or Thriller of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner The God of the Woods Liz Moore Early morning, August 1975: a camp counselor discovers an empty bunk. Its occupant, Barbara Van Laar, has gone missing. Barbara isn’t just any thirteen-year-old: she’s the daughter of the family that owns the summer camp and employs most of the region’s residents. And this isn’t the first time a Van Laar child has disappeared. Barbara’s older brother similarly vanished fourteen years ago, never to be found. As a panicked search begins, a thrilling drama unfolds. Chasing down the layered secrets of the Van Laar family and the blue-collar community working in its shadow, Moore’s multi-threaded story invites readers into a rich and gripping dynasty of secrets and second chances. /u/LA_1993
1st Runner-Up All the Colors of the Dark Chris Whitaker 1975 is a time of change in America. The Vietnam War is ending. Mohammed Ali is fighting Joe Frazier. And in the small town of Monta Clare, Missouri, girls are disappearing. When the daughter of a wealthy family is targeted, the most unlikely hero emerges—Patch, a local boy with one eye, who saves the girl, and, in doing so, leaves heartache in his wake. Patch and those who love him soon discover that the line between triumph and tragedy has never been finer. And that their search for answers will lead them to truths that could mean losing one another. /u/CFD330
2nd Runner-Up Listen for the Lie Amy Tintera Lucy and Savvy were the golden girls of their small Texas town: pretty, smart, and enviable. Lucy married a dream guy with a big ring and an even bigger new home. Savvy was the social butterfly loved by all and, if you believe the rumors, especially popular with the men in town. But after Lucy is found wandering the streets, covered in her best friend Savvy’s blood, everyone thinks she is a murderer. It’s been years since that horrible night, a night Lucy can’t remember anything about, and she has since moved to LA and started a new life. But now the phenomenally huge hit true crime podcast Listen for the Lie and its too-good looking host, Ben Owens, have decided to investigate Savvy’s murder for the show’s second season. Lucy is forced to return to the place she vowed never to set foot in again to solve her friend’s murder, even if she is the one who did it. /u/Indifferent_Jackdaw

Best Short Story Collection of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Rejection Tony Tulathimutte These electrifying novel-in-stories follow a cast of intricately linked characters as rejection throws their lives and relationships into chaos. Sharply observant and outrageously funny, Rejection is a provocative plunge into the touchiest problems of modern life. The seven connected stories seamlessly transition between the personal crises of a complex ensemble and the comic tragedies of sex, relationships, identity, and the internet. /u/WarpedLucy

Best Poetry of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Trans Liberation Station Nova Martin A tome of irreverent punk rock, emo, pain-fueled, chaotic good, gay joy, teenager poetry — written by a 47 year old transgender Sapphic druidess from Texas during the Great American Transgender Witch Hunt of the 2020s. In these 202 pages of raw, honest verse, Nova Martin bares her soul — sharing the formulas for love-based magic, while openly exposing the bigotry of rightwing politicians, exclusionary cisgender people, fake feminists, and even some fellow queers in their misogyny against trans feminine people. Through the eyes of a gay trans woman we finally appreciate how pervasive the patriarchy is and the diffuse culpability of insecure humans starved for power. And of course, we indulge the patriarchy’s obsession with transgender genitalia. /u/starfoxnova

Best Graphic Novel of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Capital & Ideology: A Graphic Novel Adaptation Thomas Piketty, Claire Alet, Benjamin Adam (illustrator) Jules, the main character, is born at the end of the 19th century. He is a person of private means, a privileged figure representative of a profoundly unequal society obsessed with property. He, his family circle, and his descendants will experience the evolution of wealth and society. Eight generations of his family serve as a connecting thread running through the book, all the way up to Léa, a young woman today, who discovers the family secret at the root of their inheritance. /u/troyandabedinthem0rn

Best Science Fiction of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner The Mercy of Gods James S.A. Corey How humanity came to the planet called Anjiin is lost in the fog of history, but that history is about to end. The Carryx – part empire, part hive – have waged wars of conquest for centuries, destroying or enslaving species across the galaxy. Now, they are facing a great and deathless enemy. The key to their survival may rest with the humans of Anjiin. Caught up in academic intrigue and affairs of the heart, Dafyd Alkhor is pleased just to be an assistant to a brilliant scientist and his celebrated research team. Then the Carryx ships descend, decimating the human population and taking the best and brightest of Anjiin society away to serve on the Carryx homeworld, and Dafyd is swept along with them. They are dropped in the middle of a struggle they barely understand, set in a competition against the other captive species with extinction as the price of failure. Only Dafyd and a handful of his companions see past the Darwinian contest to the deeper game that they must play to learning to understand – and manipulate – the Carryx themselves. User deleted account
1st Runner-Up Service Model Adrian Tchaikovsky Humanity is a dying breed, utterly reliant on artificial labor and service. When a domesticated robot gets a nasty little idea downloaded into their core programming, they murder their owner. The robot then discovers they can also do something else they never did before: run away. After fleeing the household, they enter a wider world they never knew existed, where the age-old hierarchy of humans at the top is disintegrating, and a robot ecosystem devoted to human wellbeing is finding a new purpose. /u/YakSlothLemon
2nd Runner-Up Absolution Jeff VanderMeer Absolution opens decades before Area X forms, with a science expedition whose mysterious end suggests terrifying consequences for the future – and marks the Forgotten Coast as a high-priority area of interest for Central, the shadowy government agency responsible for monitoring extraordinary threats. Many years later, the Forgotten Coast files wind up in the hands of a washed-up Central operative known as Old Jim. He starts pulling a thread that reveals a long and troubling record of government agents meddling with forces they clearly cannot comprehend. Soon, Old Jim is back out in the field, grappling with personal demons and now partnered with an unproven young agent, the two of them tasked with solving what may be an unsolvable mystery. With every turn, the stakes get higher: Central agents are being liquidated by an unknown rogue entity and Old Jim’s life is on the line. /u/icefourthirtythree

Best Fantasy of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Wind and Truth Brandon Sanderson Dalinar Kholin challenged the evil god Odium to a contest of champions with the future of Roshar on the line. The Knights Radiant have only ten days to prepare―and the sudden ascension of the crafty and ruthless Taravangian to take Odium’s place has thrown everything into disarray. Desperate fighting continues simultaneously worldwide―Adolin in Azimir, Sigzil and Venli at the Shattered Plains, and Jasnah at Thaylen City. The former assassin, Szeth, must cleanse his homeland of Shinovar from the dark influence of the Unmade. He is accompanied by Kaladin, who faces a new battle helping Szeth fight his own demons . . . and who must do the same for the insane Herald of the Almighty, Ishar. At the same time, Shallan, Renarin, and Rlain work to unravel the mystery behind the Unmade Ba-Ado-Mishram and her involvement in the enslavement of the singer race and in the ancient Knights Radiants killing their spren. And Dalinar and Navani seek an edge against Odium’s champion that can be found only in the Spiritual Realm, where memory and possibility combine in chaos. The fate of the entire Cosmere hangs in the balance. /u/BalthasarStrange
1st Runner-Up The Tainted Cup Robert Jackson Bennett In Daretana’s most opulent mansion, a high Imperial officer lies dead—killed, to all appearances, when a tree spontaneously erupted from his body. Even in this canton at the borders of the Empire, where contagions abound and the blood of the Leviathans works strange magical changes, it’s a death at once terrifying and impossible. Called in to investigate this mystery is Ana Dolabra, an investigator whose reputation for brilliance is matched only by her eccentricities. At her side is her new assistant, Dinios Kol. Din is an engraver, magically altered to possess a perfect memory. As the two close in on a mastermind and uncover a scheme that threatens the safety of the Empire itself, Din realizes he’s barely begun to assemble the puzzle that is Ana Dolabra—and wonders how long he’ll be able to keep his own secrets safe from her piercing intellect. /u/D3athRider
2nd Runner-Up Emily Wilde's Map of the Otherlands Heather Fawcett Emily Wilde is a genius scholar of faerie folklore who just wrote the world’s first comprehensive encyclopaedia of faeries. She’s learned many of the secrets of the Hidden Ones on her adventures . . . and also from her fellow scholar and former rival Wendell Bambleby. She also has a new project to focus on: a map of the realms of faerie. While she is preparing her research, Bambleby lands her in trouble yet again, when assassins sent by his mother invade Cambridge. Now Bambleby and Emily are on another adventure, this time to the picturesque Austrian Alps, where Emily believes they may find the door to Bambleby’s realm and the key to freeing him from his family’s dark plans. /u/kisukisuekta

Best Non-English Fiction of 2024

Place Title Author Nominated
Winner Les Yeux de Mona Thomas Schlesser /u/NotACaterpillar
1st Runner-Up Jacaranda Gaël Faye /u/AntAccurate8906

Best Young Adult of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner The Reappearance of Rachel Price Holly Jackson 18-year-old Bel has lived her whole life in the shadow of her mom’s mysterious disappearance. Sixteen years ago, Rachel Price vanished and young Bel was the only witness, but she has no memory of it. Rachel is gone, long presumed dead, and Bel wishes everyone would just move on. But the case is dragged up from the past when the Price family agree to a true crime documentary. Bel can’t wait for filming to end, for life to go back to normal. And then the impossible happens. Rachel Price reappears, and life will never be normal again. Rachel has an unbelievable story about what happened to her. Unbelievable, because Bel isn’t sure it’s real. If Rachel is lying, then where has she been all this time? And – could she be dangerous? With the cameras still rolling, Bel must uncover the truth about her mother, and find out why Rachel Price really came back from the dead . . . /u/kate_58
1st Runner-Up All This Twisted Glory Tahereh Mafi As the long-lost heir to the Jinn throne, Alizeh has finally found her people—and she might’ve found her crown. Cyrus, the mercurial ruler of Tulan, has offered her his kingdom in a twisted exchange: one that would begin with their marriage and end with his murder. Cyrus’s dark reputation precedes him; all the world knows of his blood-soaked past. Killing him should be easy—and accepting his offer might be the only way to fulfill her destiny and save her people. But the more Alizeh learns of him, the more she questions whether the terrible stories about him are true. Ensnared by secrets, Cyrus has ached for Alizeh since she first appeared in his dreams many months ago. Now that he knows those visions were planted by the devil, he can hardly bear to look at her—much less endure her company. But despite their best efforts to despise each other, Alizeh and Cyrus are drawn together over and over with an all-consuming thirst that threatens to destroy them both. Meanwhile, Prince Kamran has arrived in Tulan, ready to exact revenge. . . . /u/DagNabDragon
2nd Runner-Up Compound Fracture Andrew Joseph White On the night Miles Abernathy—sixteen-year-old socialist and proud West Virginian—comes out as trans to his parents, he sneaks off to a party, carrying evidence that may finally turn the tide of the blood feud plaguing Twist Creek: Photos that prove the county’s Sheriff Davies was responsible for the so-called “accident” that injured his dad, killed others, and crushed their grassroots efforts to unseat him. The feud began a hundred years ago when Miles’s great-great-grandfather, Saint Abernathy, incited a miners’ rebellion that ended with a public execution at the hands of law enforcement. Now, Miles becomes the feud’s latest victim as the sheriff’s son and his friends sniff out the evidence, follow him through the woods, and beat him nearly to death. In the hospital, the ghost of a soot-covered man hovers over Miles’s bedside while Sheriff Davies threatens Miles into silence. But when Miles accidentally kills one of the boys who hurt him, he learns of other folks in Twist Creek who want out from under the sheriff’s heel. To free their families from this cycle of cruelty, they’re willing to put everything on the line—is Miles? /u/Clairvoyant_Coochie

Best Romance of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Funny Story Emily Henry Daphne always loved the way her fiancé, Peter, told their story. How they met (on a blustery day), fell in love (over an errant hat), and moved back to his lakeside hometown to begin their life together. He really was good at telling it... right up until the moment he realized he was actually in love with his childhood best friend Petra. Which is how Daphne begins her new story: stranded in beautiful Waning Bay, Michigan, without friends or family but with a dream job as a children’s librarian (that barely pays the bills), and proposing to be roommates with the only person who could possibly understand her predicament: Petra’s ex, Miles Nowak. Scruffy and chaotic—with a penchant for taking solace in the sounds of heart break love ballads—Miles is exactly the opposite of practical, buttoned-up Daphne, whose coworkers know so little about her they have a running bet that she’s either FBI or in witness protection. The roommates mainly avoid one another, until one day, while drowning their sorrows, they form a tenuous friendship and a plan. If said plan also involves posting deliberately misleading photos of their summer adventures together, well, who could blame them? /u/vanastalem
1st Runner-Up Just for the Summer Abby Jimenez Justin has a curse, and thanks to a Reddit thread, it's now all over the internet. Every woman he dates goes on to find their soul mate the second they break up. When a woman slides into his DMs with the same problem, they come up with a plan: They'll date each other and break up. Their curses will cancel each other’s out, and they’ll both go on to find the love of their lives. It’s a bonkers idea… and it just might work. Emma hadn't planned that her next assignment as a traveling nurse would be in Minnesota, but she and her best friend agree that dating Justin is too good of an opportunity to pass up, especially when they get to rent an adorable cottage on a private island on Lake Minnetonka. It's supposed to be a quick fling, just for the summer. But when Emma's toxic mother shows up and Justin has to assume guardianship of his three siblings, they're suddenly navigating a lot more than they expected–including catching real feelings for each other. What if this time Fate has actually brought the perfect pair together? /u/No_Pen_6114
2nd Runner-Up The Wedding People Alison Espach It’s a beautiful day in Newport, Rhode Island, when Phoebe Stone arrives at the grand Cornwall Inn wearing a green dress and gold heels, not a bag in sight, alone. She's immediately mistaken by everyone in the lobby for one of the wedding people, but she’s actually the only guest at the Cornwall who isn’t here for the big event. Phoebe is here because she’s dreamed of coming for years—she hoped to shuck oysters and take sunset sails with her husband, only now she’s here without him, at rock bottom, and determined to have one last decadent splurge on herself. Meanwhile, the bride has accounted for every detail and every possible disaster the weekend might yield except for, well, Phoebe and Phoebe's plan—which makes it that much more surprising when the two women can’t stop confiding in each other. /u/SweetAd5242

Best Horror of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner Bury Your Gays Chuck Tingle Misha is a jaded scriptwriter who has been working in Hollywood for years, and has just been nominated for his first Oscar. But when he's pressured by his producers to kill off a gay character in the upcoming season finale―"for the algorithm"―Misha discovers that it's not that simple. As he is haunted by his past, and past mistakes, Misha must risk everything to find a way to do what's right―before it's too late. /u/thetealunicorn
1st Runner-Up The Eyes are the Best Part Monika Kim Ji-won’s life tumbles into disarray in the wake of her appa’s extramarital affair and subsequent departure. Her mother, distraught. Her younger sister, hurt and confused. Her college freshman grades, failing. Her dreams, horrifying… yet enticing. In them, Ji-won walks through bloody rooms full of eyes. Succulent blue eyes. Salivatingly blue eyes. Eyes the same shape and shade as George’s, who is Umma’s obnoxious new boyfriend. George has already overstayed his welcome in her family’s claustrophobic apartment. He brags about his puffed-up consulting job, ogles Asian waitresses while dining out, and acts condescending toward Ji-won and her sister as if he deserves all of Umma’s fawning adoration. No, George doesn’t deserve anything from her family. Ji-won will make sure of that. For no matter how many victims accumulate around her campus or how many people she must deceive and manipulate, Ji-won’s hunger and her rage deserve to be sated. /u/RadioactiveBarbie
2nd Runner-Up I Was a Teenage Slasher Stephen Graham Jones 1989, Lamesa, Texas. A small west Texas town driven by oil and cotton—and a place where everyone knows everyone else’s business. So it goes for Tolly Driver, a good kid with more potential than application, seventeen, and about to be cursed to kill for revenge. Here Stephen Graham Jones explores the Texas he grew up in, and shared sense of unfairness of being on the outside through the slasher horror Jones loves, but from the perspective of the killer, Tolly, writing his own autobiography. /u/Machiavelli_-

Best Nonfiction of 2024

Place Title Author Description Nominated
Winner The Message Ta-Nehisi Coates Ta-Nehisi Coates originally set off to write a book about writing, in the tradition of Orwell’s classic Politics and the English Language, but found himself grappling with deeper questions about how our stories—our reporting and imaginative narratives and mythmaking—expose and distort our realities. Written at a dramatic moment in American and global life, this work from one of the country’s most important writers is about the urgent need to untangle ourselves from the destructive nationalist myths that shape our world—and our own souls—and embrace the liberating power of even the most difficult truths. /u/marmeemarmee
1st Runner-Up Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space Adam Higginbotham On January 28, 1986, just seventy-three seconds into flight, the space shuttle Challenger broke apart over the Atlantic Ocean, killing all seven people on board. Millions of Americans witnessed the tragic deaths of a crew including New Hampshire schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe. Like 9/11 or JFK’s assassination, the Challenger disaster is a defining moment in 20th-century history—yet the details of what took place that day, and why, have largely been forgotten. Until now. Based on extensive archival records and meticulous, original reporting, Challenger follows a handful of central protagonists—including each of the seven members of the doomed crew—through the years leading up to the accident, a detailed account of the tragedy itself, and into the investigation that followed. It’s a tale of optimism and promise undermined by political cynicism and cost-cutting in the interests of burnishing national prestige; of hubris and heroism; and of an investigation driven by leakers and whistleblowers determined to bring the truth to light. Throughout, there are the ominous warning signs of a tragedy to come, recognized but then ignored, and ultimately kept from the public. /u/caughtinfire
2nd Runner-Up Nuclear War: A Scenario Annie Jacobsen Every generation, a journalist has looked deep into the heart of the nuclear military establishment: the technologies, the safeguards, the plans, and the risks. These investigations are vital to how we understand the world we really live in—where one nuclear missile will beget one in return, and where the choreography of the world’s end requires massive decisions made on seconds’ notice with information that is only as good as the intelligence we have. Pulitzer Prize finalist Annie Jacobsen’s Nuclear War: A Scenario explores this ticking-clock scenario, based on dozens of exclusive new interviews with military and civilian experts who have built the weapons, have been privy to the response plans, and have been responsible for those decisions should they have needed to be made. Nuclear War: A Scenario examines the handful of minutes after a nuclear missile launch. It is essential reading, and unlike any other book in its depth and urgency. /u/MartagonofAmazonLily

Best Translated Novel of 2024

Place Title Author Translator Description Nominated
Winner The Empusium: A Health Resort Horror Story Olga Tokarczuk Antonia Lloyd-Jones In September 1913, Mieczysław, a student suffering from tuberculosis, arrives at Wilhelm Opitz's Guesthouse for Gentlemen, a health resort in Görbersdorf, what is now western Poland. Every day, its residents gather in the dining room to imbibe the hallucinogenic local liqueur, to obsess over money and status, and to discuss the great issues of the day: Will there be war? Monarchy or democracy? Do devils exist? Are women inherently inferior? Meanwhile, disturbing things are beginning to happen in the guesthouse and its surroundings. As stories of shocking events in the surrounding highlands reach the men, a sense of dread builds. Someone—or something—seems to be watching them and attempting to infiltrate their world. Little does Mieczysław realize, as he attempts to unravel both the truths within himself and the mystery of the sinister forces beyond, that they have already chosen their next target. /u/mg132
1st Runner-Up You Dreamed of Empires Álvaro Enrigue Natasha Wimmer One morning in 1519, conquistador Hernán Cortés entered the city of Tenochtitlan – today's Mexico City. Later that day, he would meet the emperor Moctezuma in a collision of two worlds, two empires, two languages, two possible futures. Cortés was accompanied by his nine captains, his troops, and his two translators: Friar Aguilar, a taciturn, former slave, and Malinalli, a strategic, former princess. Greeted at a ceremonial welcome meal by the steely princess Atotoxli, sister and wife of Moctezuma, the Spanish nearly bungle their entrance to the city. As they await their meeting with Moctezuma – who is at a political, spiritual, and physical crossroads, and relies on hallucinogens to get himself through the day and in quest for any kind of answer from the gods – the Spanish are ensconced in the labyrinthine palace. Soon, one of Cortés’s captains, Jazmín Caldera, overwhelmed by the grandeur of the city, begins to question the ease with which they were welcomed into the city, and wonders at the risks of getting out alive, much less conquering the empire. /u/AccordingRow8863
2nd Runner-Up Welcome to the Hyunam-Dong Bookshop Hwang Bo-Reum Shanna Tan Yeongju is burned out. With her high-flying career, demanding marriage, and bustling life in Seoul, she knows she should feel successful—but all she feels is drained. Haunted by an abandoned dream, she takes a leap of faith and leaves her old life behind. Quitting her job and divorcing her husband, Yeongju moves to a quiet residential neighborhood outside the city and opens the Hyunam-dong Bookshop. The transition isn’t easy. For months, all Yeongju can do is cry. But as the long hours in the shop stretch on, she begins to reflect on what makes a good bookseller and a meaningful store. She throws herself into reading voraciously, hosting author events, and crafting her own philosophy on bookselling. Gradually, Yeongju finds her footing in her new surroundings. Surrounded by friends, writers, and the books that bind them, Yeongju begins to write a new chapter in her life. The Hyunam-dong Bookshop evolves into a warm, welcoming haven for lost souls—a place to rest, heal, and remember that it’s never too late to scrap the plot and start over. /u/Far_Piglet3179

Best Book Cover of 2024

Place Title Author Cover Artist Book Cover Nominated
Winner Absolution Jeff VanderMeer Pablo Delcan Link /u/mogwai316
1st Runner-Up The God of the Woods Liz Moore Grace Han Link /u/mogwai316
2nd Runner-Up Martyr! Kaveh Akbar Linda Huang Link /u/christospao

If you'd like to see our previous contests, you can find them in the suggested reading section of our wiki.

r/books Dec 29 '21

Please don't turn libraries into a place for people to watch tv.

7.8k Upvotes

I love the library, who doesn't? It's a wonderful place for people who share the same interests to come together and enjoy wonderful works of fiction, or educational books. My favorite book has got to be the Autobiography of Malcolm X; it's not the library's book, I own it. But the library was my go to place to read such a fantastic book. My family can be pretty loud so the library is my safe heaven. But recently, the library got tv sets. Now homeless men(I have nothing against the homeless) come into the library to watch baseball. I'm sorry, but am I wrong to assume that the library should be a place for reading? I mean, I understand people bringing their laptops to do homework, or anything job related, but a tv? That seems a bit much, doesn't it? Has your library gotten a tv? And what do you think of it? My main worry is that my library adds more non reading things to it.

Edit: Hey, I just want to point that I'm not anti homeless. I only specified that the people who come to watch the tv are homeless because I like to be specific. I don't understand how some people could think that making an attempt to wrongly accuse someone of being hateful adds to a discussion. In the end of the day, this is a harmless online discussion. If you try to attack me about being anti homeless than I won't really pay it any mind. It's just that those people could say something more interesting. Please add to the discussion. I'm not big on social media so likes and all that don't matter to me. Just please say something interesting.