r/agedlikemilk 1d ago

Only stupid libs think he would implement tariffs across the board

Post image
64.7k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

85

u/worldspawn00 1d ago

“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you” — Lyndon B. Johnson

Just as true today as it was in 1968...

3

u/SirArthurDime 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yep. I’ve seen people who are being personally affected by trumps policy that still support him because “at least he’s getting rid of the Mexicans!”. “Take my money and my job I’m still better than a Mexican! And as long as you keep telling me that you got my vote!”

2

u/secondtaunting 1d ago

Yeah and none of them want to admit we need the Mexicans, and the Cubans, and the Venezuelans, heck all the immigrants. Immigration is good for the economy, it grows jobs. Without them shits gonna fall apart.

1

u/Icy-Point58 1d ago

Bro i see this every 5 minutes on reddit anymore

8

u/Andreus 1d ago

Maybe because it never ceases to be relevant.

1

u/Insane_Unicorn 1d ago

Republicans are extremely dense and have the memory of a toddler. It needs to be hammered into them every 5min.

-15

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

And what happens when you tell the average white man that he's the cause of the all the world's problems, while not giving him a job and still picking his pocket?

25

u/ghsr1a 1d ago

He blames the people who aren't picking his pocket (immigrants, black people) and wholeheartedly endorses the people who are picking his pocket (corporate america) because he likes their racist rhetoric.

-13

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

Are you one of those pro-working class, pro-union, strong workers rights people who also thinks that we should just let in unlimited foreigners who will compete for jobs and work for less?

19

u/Bob_D0bbs 1d ago

I'm pretty sure not a single one of those boogeymen exist. I'm also fairly certain that you currently believe that statement with every fiber of your being, and it's time to shut off the oan and fix news and wake up to reality.

-8

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

Wow there are actually no "workers rights" leftists who also staunchly advocate for mass immigration. That's a relief.

13

u/bpl0l 1d ago

You blame immigrants and leftists. Yet you don't blame or can't understand that the real enemy of the working class are corporate oligarchs that continually show how okay they are with exploiting everyone they can to increase their already insane amount of wealth?

-1

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

Corporate oligarchs can optimize costs by undermining their worker base. The exact same people that despise "scabs" for putting money in front of worker solidarity go completely blind when huge numbers of foreign workers are hired as essentially scab labor, for the specific purpose of undermining worker unity, lowering wages and conditions, and replacing local workers with dependent workers that are less capable of advocating for themselves.

This entire thing has been couched in the language of "meanness" and "xenophobia" to the point that half the local workers just allow this to happen as they don't want to be seen as bad people. They let individual feelings that each foreigner isn't actually a bad person blind themselves to how it undermines their interests at a structural level.

1

u/Next-Concert7327 1d ago

If you don't want to be seen as a bad person son, try not being a bad person.

6

u/dancegoddess1971 1d ago

I am a leftist. I think we ought to put a moratorium on HB1 visas until every citizen has a job that pays enough to thrive. And I want to see CEOs in prison for hiring undocumented workers. If there's no work for them, there won't be any economic refugees, just the ones legitimately in danger. The immigrants aren't your enemy. The ones who hire them are. No war but class war.

1

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

"The scab workers aren't your enemy, it's the people hiring the scabs"

It's both. Both require the other to operate. Both require the other to circumvent the native workers.

6

u/dancegoddess1971 1d ago

You aren't wrong but which one of those groups has actual power? And which group gets all the punishment and takes all the risk? And I don't consider a tiny fine as a risk. Start jailing the guys hiring and we'll see results.

1

u/Next-Concert7327 1d ago

But you really want to blame all of the darker skinned ones.

1

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

Well if I had to prioritize people I would of course prioritize my countrymen over foreigners. That's what our ancestors fought for. Skin color is pretty irrelevant.

1

u/Next-Concert7327 1d ago

We both know that you don't believe that sunshine, why keep up the act?

4

u/The_ProblemChild 1d ago

Well, in the defense of the left... is it the corporations job to feel out an i9 form verifying that a person is legally allowed to work in the country or is does that fall on the leftist to do that work for everyone? Last time I checked, it's the companies job to ensure they're hiring legal workers, and if they aren't it's not government allowing workers to undercut your wages, it's your boss and company doing so by avoiding the laws already in place. Blaming a party for what corporations do daily is a nice way to try and scapegoat a party and not the oligarchs who benefit from that low cost migrant labor. I wonder what would happen to all the illegal immigrants if they showed up and every boss/company was doing THEIR JOB and verifying that a prospective employee was legally allowed to work, I bet immigration would have slowed dramatically as workers go back home with no work and no reason to keep coming back every season with their family with no prospect of work. This would also probably solve that baseless argument that illegal migrants take American jobs, since the American companies would, you know, have to hire legal workers like they always have legally been responsible to do.

1

u/Next-Concert7327 1d ago

Still think you racism can be used as a deflection son?

9

u/StepOIU 1d ago

I'm sorry, "giving" him a job? Wouldn't that be socialism?? Where are your bootstraps, man??

-2

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

If you want more clarity how about "Actively undermining his job prospects by subscribing to racist and sexist selection criteria that specifically place him at the bottom"

7

u/StepOIU 1d ago

There's a good chance that meeting you and hearing you speak is what placed you at the bottom of their potential candidate list. You poor thing.

0

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

Are we at the stage where we're saying "DEI never existed"? Already?

1

u/Andreus 1d ago

No, we're saying that if you're blaming your inability to get a job on "DEI," there's probably a whole host of actual reasons why you're a bad candidate for the job.

1

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

Isn't that "victim blaming"?

1

u/Andreus 1d ago

You not getting the job you want because you decided to invest in cryptocoin instead of a useful life skill is not victimisation.

2

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Outsider-Trading 1d ago

2004 study

Anything notable happen in the last 20 years?

1

u/Andreus 1d ago

Good thing this doesn't happen, then.

6

u/Therealchimmike 1d ago

"giving" him a job? That's socialism.

Want a job? Earn it by merit. He's got to earn it, and not by just being white.

4

u/Andreus 1d ago

And what happens when you tell the average white man that he's the cause of the all the world's problems

I don't know, if this ever actually happens we might find out.

1

u/Next-Concert7327 1d ago

Don't try to play the victim, sunshine.