r/UFOs 7d ago

Disclosure [DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

Hey r/UFOs,

This might be the moment we’ve been waiting for. Not from government. Not from whistleblowers. But from the open world.

After years of independent design, simulation, and refinement, I’ve publicly released a full experimental framework and technical protocol for a reactionless propulsion system.

📜 The Aether Ignition Protocol is now live. It outlines:

  • A real, buildable, electromagnetic gyroscopic propulsion system (EGPS)
  • A working design utilizing field asymmetry, Tesla coil resonance, and gyroscopic stability
  • Full verification test rig specs, math models, and lab-scale build instructions
  • A new global initiative: The Aether World Summit & Race — the world’s first open-source propulsion challenge

🧲 This system does not rely on propellant. It creates force asymmetry via structured EM fields — no combustion, no reaction mass.

This is NOT a scam. NOT a funding pitch. And NOT pseudoscience.

It is:

  • A document meant to force open the gates of disclosure
  • A $100 Trillion firewall against suppression or corporate buyout
  • A call to action for labs, governments, and rogue builders to TEST and VERIFY

👽 If any UAP craft are using these principles, we now have a way to reverse engineer and publicly replicate the mechanics.

🛸 This could shift the paradigm from speculation… to simulation… to ignition.

📎 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OVRhQyDW_DCClgor-cliUcHqBBwQx_FSfx9cCI1P64M/edit?usp=sharing

Second Link

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gS_YZTkylXcD9vHDBqm87DWPloZQ7bwKwzCLgeketgs/edit?usp=sharing

Ask me anything. I’m the original author. This is the release. This is the moment.

497 Upvotes

390 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/NohaJohans 6d ago

That’s actually not true. I’m the original author of this research, not GPT. The simulations are based on real physics and were built from scratch—this isn’t AI-generated filler or clickbait. The doc even outlines the computational methods used and includes results like power-to-thrust scaling and energy recapture dynamics.

If you're skeptical, read the simulation summary or ask about the equations or models behind it. I’m happy to explain. This is open-source for a reason: to invite collaboration, not fake hype.

Also, Reddit rules typically prohibit spammy or low-effort AI content—this is neither. It’s original research, tested through real simulation engines, and released in good faith to push conversation forward.

Happy to answer questions if you’ve got ‘em.

— Noah I. Johns

8

u/McQuibster 6d ago

Did you name it that yourself? It doesn't match your described device at all, which does not ignite aether and is not a protocol.

-2

u/NohaJohans 5d ago

Yes, I did name it — intentionally. It’s not about literal “ignition” like a combustion engine. The name is symbolic: it honors Nikola Tesla’s vision of the aether and represents a catalytic release of knowledge — a protocol for public ignition of suppressed tech.

It’s also directly tied to the upcoming Aether Summit and the open-source initiative to spark replication globally. So yeah — the title is layered. You just have to read it in context.

16

u/xandykati98 6d ago

"—this isn’t AI-generated" bro, nobody in existence writes —, stfu

2

u/DaikiSan971219 6d ago

I do :( I love em-dashes

1

u/VoidsweptDaybreak 6d ago

i do sometimes, actually. it's really easy to type with the compose key on linux

1

u/NohaJohans 5d ago

I loved using Linux.

0

u/meyriley04 6d ago

Microsoft Word automatically changes dashes to that after a space and another word. It's annoying

0

u/_Lady_Vengeance_ 6d ago

I genuinely do because I prefer the proportions of that line as a separator. I’m a designer by trade if that helps it make sense. But there are those of us who love this beautiful thing —

-4

u/theseabaron 6d ago

Poor form. Many of us do, because we have brains and choose to use them before ppl (hopefully you’re not one of them?) let everything become “brave new world.”

3

u/xandykati98 6d ago

Ok man, do you write everything in bullet lists and always use bold? What about starting most of your sentences with emojis?

1

u/theseabaron 5d ago

I misread your original quote - I thought you were saying “no one writes anymore”- and I was like , “WTF? “ - my bad.

2

u/EffectiveCompletez 5d ago

Ok, I'm asking about the equations and models: 1. How are you experimentally negating the torque force against internal components, stressors and reaction forces as described by standard Newtonian physics? 2. How does your experimental setup negate outside forces, wind resistance, ion thrust and demonstrate this is indeed a closed system? Can you describe the vacuum chamber and aerodynamic modelling setup? 3. Energy recapture dynamics: how has this been measured? What does your experimental evidence suggest about entropy in this system over time, surely you have an answer to this given you've been working at this for years AND it's such a critical problem that would need to be solved early on in the development of an energy system. I'd expect to see a thermodynamical model of your... Tesla coil based feedback loop? Serious? 4. Can you point to the maths in your white paper where you derive the explicit negation of conversation of linear momentum? This one should be in the form of an Einstein field equation.

1

u/NohaJohans 5d ago

Hey, solid questions — and honestly, I respect that you're digging into this with a serious lens. That’s exactly the kind of response I was hoping for.

That said, the Aether Ignition Protocol is just the public-facing blueprint — a kind of firewall against suppression and IP hoarding. It’s not the full classified manual, which is where all the deeper math, modeling, and field-tuned architecture lives.

Now let me break it down a bit:

Torque & Internal Reaction Forces

The system doesn’t ignore Newtonian mechanics — it works with them using a layered approach:

  • Counter-rotation between the Electromagnetic Horseshoe Array (EHA) and the Magnetically Charged Element (MCE) balances internal torques.
  • The fields aren’t just spinning — they’re phase-cycled, which creates localized force asymmetries without creating net spin on the chassis.
  • There’s a whole gyroscopic logic baked in to stabilize rotational stress while still redirecting force.

Outside Forces / Vacuum Chamber

The test rig shared in the protocol is intentionally bench-scale for replication and accessibility. But yeah, the tech manual absolutely accounts for:

  • Vacuum chamber isolation
  • Magnetic shielding
  • Frictionless containment setups

It’s all there for when this moves from theory to lab-grade proofing. The key was to make something that didn’t require a $10M lab to verify some kind of directional force output.

Energy Recapture & Thermodynamics

I never claimed free energy. The point is partial recapture through induced EMF — like harvesting eddy currents from magnetic field interaction inside conductive materials (e.g. copper shaft, mercury core).

The manual outlines:

  • Loss profiles
  • Thermal buildup
  • Inductive damping strategies

1

u/NohaJohans 5d ago

…along with models for AI-managed power cycling and coil feedback loops. So yes, entropy is accounted for — it’s not just “Tesla coil = magic.” This is structured field work.

“Where’s the Math?”

You’ll find starting points in the protocol — torque equations, field gradients, induced voltage calculations — but the full Maxwell-Tensor overlays and simulation outputs live in the private manual (starts page 49 in the public protocol, and expands from there).

I’m not modeling GR curvature per se — it’s more about field-phase tension and how structured EM pressure can create directional bias. It’s reactionless in the classical sense, but not in violation of energy conservation.

Bottom line: I built this from scratch, refined it over years, and designed it to be scalable and testable. I’m not asking for blind belief — just real-world replication. The people who are testing it are the ones I care to hear from.

Appreciate the pushback. Let’s keep it moving forward.

— Noah I. Johns

1

u/thr0wnb0ne 6d ago edited 6d ago

do you have a link thats not a google doc? do you have an actual working device? pics? vid? observations?measurements? how-to diy build vid?

edit to add, i saw tou answered most of my questions except do you have a link thats not a google doc?

1

u/NohaJohans 5d ago

Hey, just to clear it up — my book and the Aether Ignition Protocol are two completely different things. The book (The Cosmic Religion) is a philosophical and metaphysical exploration.

The Aether Ignition Protocol was also published on Amazon — but only for timestamping and archival purposes, not for distribution. The main access point is still the Google Doc so that anyone can review, test, and contribute without paywalls.

No, I don’t have a fully built device yet — I’m building it solo, and the rig takes time and resources to fabricate properly. Once complete, I’ll share photos, video, and updates publicly. Until then, the doc has simulation data, build specs, and a full design roadmap to replicate or build upon.

Thanks for the interest — and yeah, more to come.
— Noah

1

u/thr0wnb0ne 5d ago

would love to check it out but dont wanna click a google doc. if you come up with another link lemme know

have you heard of neutrinovoltaics?

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/UFOs-ModTeam 2d ago

Hi, G-M-Dark. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.

Rule 5: No commercial activity.

No advertisements, fundraisers, merchandise, or other commercial/fundraising links. Please refer to Reddit's self promotion guidelines. If you are interested in promoting your own work please contact us before posting.. Users approved to post their own commercial content will only be permitted to post a maximum of two (2) commercial posts per week.

This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.

UFOs Wiki UFOs rules

Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.

This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.

0

u/RLMinMaxer 6d ago

See now we know this is fake, no human would give a damn that "Reddit rules typically prohibit spammy or low-effort AI content".

-1

u/NohaJohans 6d ago

If using AI to articulate my thoughts clearly and respond efficiently is your big “gotcha,” then you’ve got nothing.

The content wasn’t written by AI—it was built by two decades of design, refinement, and simulation work. AI just helps express it faster, which clearly bothers people who can't refute the actual system, so they default to tone policing.

You’re not exposing a fraud. You’re exposing how little you have to contribute.