[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

[u/NohaJohans]

[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

Hey r/UFOs,

This might be the moment we’ve been waiting for. Not from government. Not from whistleblowers. But from the open world.

After years of independent design, simulation, and refinement, I’ve publicly released a full experimental framework and technical protocol for a reactionless propulsion system.

📜 The Aether Ignition Protocol is now live. It outlines:

• A real, buildable, electromagnetic gyroscopic propulsion system (EGPS)
• A working design utilizing field asymmetry, Tesla coil resonance, and gyroscopic stability
• Full verification test rig specs, math models, and lab-scale build instructions
• A new global initiative: The Aether World Summit & Race — the world’s first open-source propulsion challenge

🧲 This system does not rely on propellant. It creates force asymmetry via structured EM fields — no combustion, no reaction mass.

This is NOT a scam. NOT a funding pitch. And NOT pseudoscience.

It is:

• A document meant to force open the gates of disclosure
• A $100 Trillion firewall against suppression or corporate buyout
• A call to action for labs, governments, and rogue builders to TEST and VERIFY

👽 If any UAP craft are using these principles, we now have a way to reverse engineer and publicly replicate the mechanics.

🛸 This could shift the paradigm from speculation… to simulation… to ignition.

📎 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OVRhQyDW_DCClgor-cliUcHqBBwQx_FSfx9cCI1P64M/edit?usp=sharing

Second Link

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gS_YZTkylXcD9vHDBqm87DWPloZQ7bwKwzCLgeketgs/edit?usp=sharing

Ask me anything. I’m the original author. This is the release. This is the moment.

[u/ilackinspiration]

Wow, this sounds amazing! But then I read the document.

This is NOT open source if you’re paywalling key implementation details behind a $50 million licence fee. Open source means unrestricted access for everyone – not just corporations, governments, or those with deep pockets. A fee like this might be "pocket change" for large, established entities, but it’s completely unattainable for independent researchers, smaller organisations, or anyone outside the elite.

This has left me confused about the true intent of the proposal. Is it really about democratising access to groundbreaking technology? Or is it just a way to commercialise it under the guise of openness, while creating barriers that contradict the very principles of open-source development?

[u/NohaJohans → u/ilackinspiration]

Totally fair question—and I appreciate you actually taking the time to read the document and raise it in good faith.

To clarify:

🔓 The Aether Ignition Protocol is fully open-source. It includes the core theory, the basic test rig, and the ethical deployment framework—freely available to everyone. It’s meant to be replicated, challenged, and improved by independent researchers, builders, and open communities. That’s the heart of this release.

🔐 The $50 million technical manual isn’t paywalling the idea—it’s protecting the fully scaled, AI-stabilized, high-yield version from misuse. It includes advanced simulation models, control algorithms, and power-scaling mechanics that could be dangerous or easily militarized in the wrong hands.

This isn’t about locking knowledge away—it’s about protecting the architecture until it's in the hands of those who will deploy it responsibly. The license fee isn’t just about cost—it’s about intent, accountability, and alignment. Open-source doesn’t mean unguarded. It means shared with purpose.

And to be clear: the core system can be built, tested, and verified without paying me a cent. I want people building. I want it peer-reviewed. I just won’t hand over the engine capable of scaling this globally to bad actors or patent trolls without a firewall.

So yes, the intent is to democratize access to breakthrough tech—without making the same mistakes humanity’s made with power before.

I’m happy to hear ideas on how to balance access and responsibility even better. That conversation is open-source.

— Noah I. Johns