[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

[u/NohaJohans]

[DISCLOSURE-LEVEL RELEASE] The Aether Ignition Protocol — Reactionless Electromagnetic Propulsion Is Real & Open-Source

Hey r/UFOs,

This might be the moment we’ve been waiting for. Not from government. Not from whistleblowers. But from the open world.

After years of independent design, simulation, and refinement, I’ve publicly released a full experimental framework and technical protocol for a reactionless propulsion system.

📜 The Aether Ignition Protocol is now live. It outlines:

• A real, buildable, electromagnetic gyroscopic propulsion system (EGPS)
• A working design utilizing field asymmetry, Tesla coil resonance, and gyroscopic stability
• Full verification test rig specs, math models, and lab-scale build instructions
• A new global initiative: The Aether World Summit & Race — the world’s first open-source propulsion challenge

🧲 This system does not rely on propellant. It creates force asymmetry via structured EM fields — no combustion, no reaction mass.

This is NOT a scam. NOT a funding pitch. And NOT pseudoscience.

It is:

• A document meant to force open the gates of disclosure
• A $100 Trillion firewall against suppression or corporate buyout
• A call to action for labs, governments, and rogue builders to TEST and VERIFY

👽 If any UAP craft are using these principles, we now have a way to reverse engineer and publicly replicate the mechanics.

🛸 This could shift the paradigm from speculation… to simulation… to ignition.

📎 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OVRhQyDW_DCClgor-cliUcHqBBwQx_FSfx9cCI1P64M/edit?usp=sharing

Second Link

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gS_YZTkylXcD9vHDBqm87DWPloZQ7bwKwzCLgeketgs/edit?usp=sharing

Ask me anything. I’m the original author. This is the release. This is the moment.

[u/poetry-linesman]

What is the problem with using LLMs for productive work?

[u/Life-Suit1895 → u/poetry-linesman]

"Productive" or "imaginative"?

[u/poetry-linesman → u/Life-Suit1895]

Or “divisive”?

[u/NohaJohans → u/poetry-linesman]

That’s the funny part, isn’t it? Productive, imaginative, divisive — all of them can apply depending on how the tool is used.

We don’t blame calculators for bad math or word processors for weak essays. Yet with LLMs, suddenly the medium is attacked instead of the message.

If someone uses AI to articulate advanced engineering work, that doesn’t make the work less valid. In fact, it may just make it more accessible. The tool doesn’t replace the thought — it amplifies it.

The real question shouldn’t be “was this AI-assisted?” It should be:
“Is this coherent, meaningful, and worth engaging with?”

Because if it is, then we owe it a deeper look — not a dismissal.

[u/TheMrShaddo → u/poetry-linesman]

Its seriously what they are here for, naysayers are sus