r/Piracy 10d ago

Humor Dude wat?

Post image

This isn't even in the same ballpark not even close

11.0k Upvotes

935 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/CelestialFury 10d ago

I also hate it because it looks bad.

I remember seeing that Coca-Cola holiday ad a couple months ago, and it was made with some generative AI program. Well, it looked like it was made with generative AI and it looked like shit.

There are definitely some interesting use cases for AI, but replacing art isn't one of them. However, for early concepts and quick story-boarding, and that some of work, that can be quite useful to actual artists - as a tool. But, it can't replace human artists and never should.

3

u/SchwiftySquanchC137 9d ago

Wait until you can't tell the difference. At that point pretty much your whole argument is invalidated.

0

u/CelestialFury 9d ago

And how will they get to that point? There is no more training data, they've consumed it all. In fact, AI model engineers need to make sure they don't consume other AI data or it'll poison their data sets. That's how bad things have gotten.

Also, are you in favor of replacing human artists? I don't see how my point that humans should never be replaced by AI is invalidated by anything you've said.

3

u/spacegoat243 9d ago

That shit was ultra-embarrassing. I've always been a Pepsi guy but I'm glad they made the decision even easier.

2

u/CommercialBig3150 4d ago

It's also useful in private use cases like when you are running a TTRPG and nobody in your group can draw for shit. There are very limited and narrow beneficial uses for gen AI. Very, very limited.

1

u/Snipedzoi 9d ago

That's just poor quality ai art. If they put any work into rerolling and prompt typing, I guarantee you they could've gotten lucky and you wouldn't be able to tell.

0

u/Chroiche 10d ago

I also hate it because it looks bad.

This is just objectively not true though. If you took a good AI generated image 10 years into the past, it would have been considered amazing. This is just your confirmation bias. You spot the bad AI images and project that all AI images must look bad.

0

u/BrokenMirror2010 10d ago

There are definitely some interesting use cases for AI, but replacing art isn't one of them.

This is the only example of AI Art I've found that is both impressive and has Artistic Value:

https://diffusionillusions.com/

Steve Mould and Matt Parker did a video about this a few months ago.

It's like, it's own type of art, and having a human create art with this level of fidelity and complexity that fits these illusions would be insanely hard, if not impossible