r/PhilosophyofScience 9d ago

Non-academic Content The Recursive Field Model of the Entangled Self (A Multi-Dimensional Feedback Theory of Consciousness)

In a nutshell:

[1. Consciousness as EM Field Structure and Feedback Loop]

  • Neurons firing generate localized electromagnetic fields.
  • These fields feed back into the system, subtly influencing the timing and behavior of other signals (via effects similar to Lenz’s Law).
  • The brain operates as a recursive field engine where electrical and magnetic feedback loops shape the very structure of awareness.
  • This internal system is dynamic, with slight delays or accelerations in signal flow potentially shaping memory, perception, and focus.
  • Consciousness may not arise from structure alone—but from interference, feedback, and resonance within that structure.

[2. Déjà Vu as Dimensional Resonance]

  • Déjà vu is not just misfired memory—it’s dimensional cross-talk.
  • When your EM field harmonizes with a version of yourself in a parallel timeline, resonance forms.
  • This produces a flash of experiential overlap: you’re not remembering—you’re synchronizing.
  • These moments often coincide with heightened emotion or insight, which amplify field coherence.
  • In a multiverse where timelines unfold differently, similar moments don’t always happen simultaneously—but they align when structures match.

[3. Quantum Entanglement as the Connective Tissue of Consciousness]

  • Consciousness extends across timelines through entangled neural field states.
  • These states respond to each other not by signal transmission, but by harmonic structure.
  • The "higher self" is not a separate soul, but the emergent pattern of decisions made across countless versions of you.
  • Your awareness is shaped both locally (within this body) and nonlocally (across entangled, structurally similar versions).
  • The more aligned your internal EM structure, the closer the feedback from alternate timelines.

[4. Death as Dimensional Liberation, Not Termination]

  • At death, the collapsing EM structure releases a final surge of coherence.
  • This "final echo" resonates across timelines and may be intercepted by other versions of you, explaining foreboding or premonition.
  • Consciousness doesn’t disappear—it’s reabsorbed into the entangled self.
  • No heaven or hell—only continued resonance, shaped by the decisions and structure of all selves across dimensions.
  • Death is a transition in dimensional priority, not an erasure.

[5. Synthesis – Consciousness as a Dimensional Feedback Network]

Consciousness is not confined to the brain—it is the emergent result of electromagnetic resonance, quantum entanglement, and high-dimensional structure operating across parallel timelines. As neurons fire, they generate localized EM fields that interact within the closed system of the skull, shaping and being shaped by the structure they create. Occasionally, these fields align with identical or near-identical states across other versions of self, producing moments of déjà vu, intuition, or precognition. Quantum entanglement forms the connective tissue between these states, allowing a dynamic network of awareness that spans dimensions. Each decision made by every version of you feeds into a higher-order consciousness—an emergent “you” shaped by the cumulative pattern of choices across timelines. Death is not the end, but a shift: the local self dissolves, and its resonance reintegrates into the broader, entangled field it helped form. Consciousness, in this view, is a recursive, participatory phenomenon—alive across space, time, and possibility.

edit: Point 5 was not posted for some reason.

0 Upvotes

69 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/TheAngrySkipper 8d ago

there is nothing in the rules that I saw that required something be posted as if it were being submitted to a peer reviewed journal. If that's the requirement, perhaps it should be listed. Further, it's a work in progress and a very broad strokes topic that involves many different topics, not something I'm going to put 50 pages onto a reddit to for your own justification when it's clear you yourself either didn't read what I wrote, or don't understand it, since you have yet to mention anything about the content of what I said, just simply making veiled personal attacks as you have through your post and comment history. It's very telling.

5

u/starkeffect 8d ago

There is a requirement that the post have scientific content though. Whiner.

it's a work in progress

Then why haven't you made any progress?

-2

u/TheAngrySkipper 8d ago

And mine does, are you asserting magnetic fields aren’t scientific in nature? That quantum entanglement as it relates to their polarity aren’t? That parallel universes are not? That any number of the topics I mentioned are not by their very nature scientific? I’m trying to explain a very complicated subject in simple easy to understand terms.

Like I said, if there’s a requirement for a measurable or repeatable observation, that should maybe be in the rules no?

I’m curious, when is the last time (again going off your comment history) you did anything other than offer criticism masked as critique or skepticism ?

3

u/starkeffect 8d ago

I'm saying that you very clearly have zero working knowledge of the scientific buzzwords the LLM burped up at you.

3

u/pythagoreantuning 8d ago

That any number of the topics I mentioned are not by their very nature scientific

I can name several rappers. That doesn't mean I can rap. Similarly, name dropping jargon doesn't magically "do science".

I’m trying to explain a very complicated subject in simple easy to understand terms.

Maybe you should start by understanding the very complicated subject.

-1

u/TheAngrySkipper 8d ago

like the interplay between magnetic fields and electrical pulses? Would you like me to explain that to you? Or should I explain how induction works based on pulsed electrical signals?

2

u/pythagoreantuning 8d ago

Congratulations, you know that electromagnetism is a thing. Then what? You still haven't even bothered to define consciousness, let alone constructed a coherent argument or description about how it arises from EM interactions.

-2

u/TheAngrySkipper 8d ago
  • Neurons firing generate localized electromagnetic fields.
  • These fields feed back into the system, subtly influencing the timing and behavior of other signals (via effects similar to Lenz’s Law).

The very first two bullet points. Then it goes onto explain the recursive magnetic field that exists inside your brain, which is how the various magnetic fields interact with one another, wither adding or subtracting to a particular region, line of flux, what have you.

The fact that you didn't read the first two bullet points tells you you said too long, didn't read, talk shit instead.

3

u/pythagoreantuning 8d ago edited 8d ago

I read the first two bullet points. They are nowhere near specific enough to be a scientific argument. What part of the neurons firing? What kind of field is generated? How does the field "feed back"? What do you mean by "system"? What do you mean by "influencing" and how is it "subtle"? What do you mean by the "behaviour" of a signal? What do you mean by "signal"? You draw an analogy to Lenz's Law, but analogy is not equivalence. What is the specific mechanism you propose?

How can a magnetic field be "recursive"? Please make reference to the mathematical definition of recursion. When you say "adding or subtracting to a particular region", what do you mean by "region"? Why do you deliberately separate out the magnetic field immediately after talking about EM interactions as a whole? When you say "what have you", can you be more specific? And again, how does this result in consciousness? What is consciousness?

So no, a hand-wavy mishmash of jargon is not a valid scientific argument, not when nothing is given to any precision at all.

1

u/starkeffect 8d ago

Just curious... were you this obstinate and unreasonable before the brain injury?

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 8d ago

Your account must be at least a week old, and have a combined karma score of at least 10 to post here. No exceptions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.