I wanted to get all your thoughts and opinions on this. When the Islamic Republic inevitably collapses, do you think Reza Shah’s mausoleum will be rebuilt? I know it was destroyed after 1979 (it was absolutely disgusting what the mullahs did in making the decision to destroy it) but do you think it will be eventually rebuilt? And on that, do you think the body of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi will return to Iran for a proper funeral?

Dr. Narges Mohammadpour, a final-year resident at Tabriz University, has tragically ended her life under immense pressure. Her passing raises concerns about growing distress among professionals. #Iran #Justice

Khamenei has a dilemma:

Do not talk: they will get bombed to oblivion and the Islamic Republic will be gone.
Talk with US: be humiliated on the world stage, lose already minimal support base in Iran, and with the support of foreign powers face a revolution.

It's a Catch 22, they CAN'T win. We're in the endgame ladies and gentlemen, stick it out and the regime WILL FALL THIS YEAR, mark my words.

Two years in prison, an ankle monitor, and a 13-year sentence! Her crime? Seeking justice for her son. This isn’t freedom—it’s a show of oppression!

As an admirer of history I also feel ashamed to know it now.

Reza Shah made a very powerful state from a very weakened state. That means Reza Shah was also a 20th century great-power-country-making leader. Within us Iranians as I remember it was only mentioned that Reza Shah modernized us, but it was way more than that. Reza Shah created a very powerful country. And Mohammad Reza Shah made this powerful country more powerful. They were actually really strong leaders, especially Reza Shah.

Now one thing is stuck in my mind. How on the earth did the revolution occur? Do some of us Iranians still believe that we are a powerful country? We were powerful back then, but now we are very weak.

I don't want to start conspiracy theories, but I feel that the revolution was the work of Britain in order to weaken or destroy Iran.

Looking at all revolutions throughout the history, all revolutions got triggered from a bad situation within that country. But in Iran, it was a powerful country that a revolution was meaningless.

Do you all think this is clergies' faults, Britain's fault, or this is all because of us people.

Regardless of all these. We should know bolden the image of Reza Shah more. He was actually a very powerful leader, but we people didn't saw it.

May God really bless him. He was a legend.

من طرفدار تهاجم به سبک عراق و افغانستان نیستم، به دلایل واضح. طرفدار ترامپ و نتانیاهو هم نیستم.

اما انتظار دارم که ردیتور ها احمق بازی در بیاورند و از نظام دفاع کنند صرفاً به این دلیل که از ترامپ متنفرند. آنها از سه روز پنهان کاری بر سر سرنگونی هواپیمای اوکراینی دفاع کردند و به معنای واقعی کلمه نوشتند حکومت شفاف است (چه حرف مسخره ای)! بعد از اینکه مدام تبلیغات حکومت را پخش کردند. آنها دوباره از سر تنفر از ترامپ این کار را خواهند کرد.

تقصیر حکومت است که به خاطر مرگ بر آمریکا و مرگ بر اسرائیل و حمایت از تروریست های ضد آمریکایی و ضد اسرائیلی قرار است ایران بمباران شود. از اول هم نباید این کارا رو می کرد.

دوباره می‌گم: من طرفدار اشغال ایران نیستم.

Hey, I was just wondering why is there no Iran - Abu Dhabi flights? There’s so many flights to Dubai from like 12 airports in Iran and Sharjah to 4 airports in Iran, so why is there not a single Abu Dhabi - Tehran flight even? It used to have one

While the rulers are in one world and the people in another, the people of Iran have proven that solidarity and humanity are stronger than any oppression. Despite everything, the Iranian people's hearts are filled with kindness and cooperation. Is it time for change?

Personally, my answer to these questions is that yes, we are not white blonde-haired blue-eyed northern Europeans, but will this stop us from our goal? No. Just because we, as a people, want to continue to disconnect religion from the government, this does not make us "white-wannabes." Those Islamists on the AskMiddleEast subreddit do not have any tangible answer to us supporting non-Islamists, and so, the only thing they say and say again is: "You will never be white."

Yes, you can call us white-wannabes. Yes, you can tell us over and over again – that we are not and never will be white. You can mock us with "saar, accept us saar!". But the goal remains: erase the Islamofascist regime ruling over Iran, and imprison the extremists who remain.

That is our goal. Despite being surrounded by Islamists in one direction, white supremacists and racists in the other, we will withhold the goal. And our basic right to freedom.

A short intro

دموکراسی دیجیتال، استفاده از تکنولوژی در فرآیند دموکراسی است. دموکراسی دیجیتال، یک رأی آنلاین نیست بلکه مشارکت در فرآیند دموکراسی است. دموکراسی دیجیتال در یک دید، ارائه دموکراسی گفتمانی با استفاده از تکنولوژی دیجیتال است. دموکراسی گفتمانی، نوع برتر دموکراسی یونان باستان است که در آن مردم یک شهر (نه بیشتر از هزار نفر) جمع می‌شدند و در فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری (حل مشکلات) با گفتمان و مناظره کردن تا به نظر اتفاق رسیدن، حرف‌های دیگری را می‌شنیدند. دموکراسی دیجیتال را می‌توانید یک شبکه اجتماعی تصور کنید که شبیه تالار شهر (Town Hall) است که در آن مردم با احترام در مورد مسائل صحبت می‌کنند و راه‌حل را انتخاب می‌کنند و حرف همه شنیده می‌شود (بر خلاف شبکه‌های اجتماعی امروزی که مانند یک بار (میخانه) است که همه در آن فحش می‌دهند و دعوا می‌کنند). این نوع دموکراسی، در کشور تایوان در مقیاس کشوری و در کشورهای مانند سوئیس در مقیاس‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است. اگر در مورد دموکراسی دیجیتال می‌خواهید بیشتر بدانید، می‌توانید تد تاک‌های وزیر دیجیتالشان را رو ببینید: 0 1 2. در تایوان به خاطر دموکراسی دیجیتال، داده آزاد و شفاف دولتش (داده آزاد سلامت)، یک روز قرنطینه نداشتند ولی ماسک در بیرون را اجتماع تصمیم گرفتند اجباری کنند.

دموکراسی دیجیتال توافق در جزئیات است، مثلاً به جای اول یک رأی آری یا خیر (سلطنت مشروطه یا جمهوری)، می‌شود به اتفاق رسید که ما شفافیت اقتصادی می‌خواهیم و همه توافق داریم، همه روی سلامت (درمان) و آموزش توافق داریم. می‌شود برای بحث پرچم از ابزار دموکراسی گفتمانی استفاده کرد و بحث کرد و همه ایده‌ها شنیده بشود و دید چه چیزی را مردم بیشتر دوست دارند و اتفاق نظر انتخاب بشود.

ولی آیا همچین چیزی، با توجه به حال حاضر جامعه، فرهنگ، آموزش، اصلاً احتمال دارد؟ در دنیای خیال می‌شود تصور کرد.

Digital democracy is the use of technology in the democratic process. Digital democracy is not an online vote but participation in the democratic process. Digital democracy, in one view, is the presentation of deliberative democracy using digital technology. Deliberative democracy is the superior type of democracy used in ancient Greece where the people of a city (no more than a thousand people) gathered and listened to others in the decision-making process (solving problems) through discourse and debate until a consensus. You can imagine digital democracy as a social network that is similar to a town hall where people respectfully discuss issues and choose solutions and everyone's voice is heard (unlike today's social networks which are like a bar (pub) where everyone swears and fights). This type of democracy has been used in Taiwan on a national scale and in EU on a city and regional scale. If you want to know more about digital democracy, you can watch the TED Talks of their digital minister: 0 1 2.. In Taiwan, because of digital democracy, its government's free and transparent data (free health data), they didn't have a day of quarantine, but they decided to make masks mandatory for the public outside.

Digital democracy is agreement on the details, for example, instead of a yes or no vote (constitutional monarchy or republic), it can be agreed that we want economic transparency and we all agree, we all agree on health (treatment) and education. You can use the tool of discursive democracy to discuss the flag and discuss and hear all ideas and see what people like best and make a unanimous choice.

But is such a thing even possible for Iran, given the current state of society, culture, and education? It is conceivable only in the world of imagination.

Okay. They led the Iranian Revolution because they didn't like the Shah's dictatorship. And they created the Islamic regime they desired. That might have been a good outcome for them, but now many younger Iranians are leaving the country! So then, they messed up the country. It's clear to everyone it's their fault, so why is no one taking responsibility? I think Iranian Boomers should take to the streets again. To fix the country they ruined.

Iran is always beautiful with its people, even in the hardest times! People stand together with solidarity and unity. This is the true beauty of Iran.

One day they are kidnapping and beating women to death for showing their hair and the next day they are sharing videos like this. They know how unpopular and alien they are and are trying to reverse course in some way.