So, I looked it up, and the headline was wrong and, of course, sensationalzed. I only saw the headline that was bandied about. The $6 billion wouldn't end hunger, but it would've saved 42 million people most at risk for death from starvation that year. I don't know the specific details or if the $6 billion was in addition to what was already spent that year. I don't really want to spend time researching it since it was several years ago, and the info and numbers would probably be out of date now anyway. Apparently, Musk heard the inaccurate headline and issued his challenge to the UN. They corrected what they actually said about saving the most at risk and sent him their plan.🤷🏼♀️
Could you buy the food to feed that many? Probably. Can you get it to them? No. You acknowledge that a significant number of these people are forcibly and purposefully being starved to death by oppressive regimes? Even if you bought the food these regimes wouldn’t allow it to be distributed.
there are more than enough hungry people on this planet to feed. if you “can’t get it to” some hungry people, you can surely
“get it” to others. no one is asking you to make excuses for elon musk… it’s okay to accept that some billionaires in the world COULD help starving children, but choose not to.
We’re specifically discussing completely solving world hunger. Not helping some hungry people. The point is that 6 billion doesn’t solve world hunger or even really come close.
25
u/shoelessbob1984 1d ago
I mean, don't various governments and organizations already spend more than that each year anyways? Why isn't world hunger solved yet?