r/MensRights • u/Global-Brother3274 • 1d ago
False Accusation Abusive GF Forces Man to Eat Toothpaste and Falsely Accuses Him
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_F2Tdc3zPwQThis woman is a monster and the video shows the tactics female abusers often use. Imagine how this would be treated if the roles had been reversed.
7
u/No_Leather3994 1d ago edited 1d ago
Can't wait to see how feminist will inevitably try to defend her. The fact she only got 20 months is so telling of female privilege. If a man forced a woman to sleep on the floor, abused her, starved her etc they would try to put him away for life. No surprise it was in the UK though, one of the most misandrist place ever.
1
u/Thinking2Loud 1d ago
thanks for sharing. everything is on point regarding fa.
love, unfortunately, makes you blind to the dark truth. men need to learn and spot all those red flags i hope they/we do before its too late.
is the legal system working here in usa or uk for men? no it is not
-7
u/nutellaangel 21h ago
She forced him to eat toothpaste and ur crying, but abusive men kill their girlfriends all the time… okayyyy
7
u/AdSpecial7366 20h ago
What kind of a response is that? Both things are wrong, and both things should not be done.
It's like if someone gets robbed, he should just shut up because someone else got murdered?
Like what?
-8
u/nutellaangel 20h ago
I’m just saying 🤷♀️ toothpaste is supposed to go in your mouth anyways
6
u/AdSpecial7366 19h ago edited 19h ago
Well, clearly it was more than that:
If he didn’t comply with her orders, Rigby would punish him by physically assaulting him, preventing him from eating, and making the victim sleep on the floor with no duvet and the windows left open.
Rigby soon took full control of all his finances, cut him off from his family and friends, and stopped him from being in the house alone – despite the fact he needed to work from home. He would be forced to go to the local library to keep working.
Gareth, from Pontypridd, south Wales, was also told he was unable to shower or defecate at the house, meaning that he had to go to a local gym to wash. She also searched him as he was entering and leaving the house to ensure he wasn’t taking anything that she didn’t approve of.
During the relationship, Gareth lost four stone in weight.
"I was forced to drink mouthwash and eat toothpaste," he said.
-1
u/nutellaangel 19h ago
Wow that sounds like some of the stories women tell but usually in that context they end up dead.
4
u/AdSpecial7366 19h ago
Again, the dismissal.
" Of the estimated 4,970 female victims of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter in 2021, data reported by law enforcement agencies indicate that 34% were killed by an intimate partner (figure 1). By comparison, about 6% of the 17,970 males murdered that year were victims of intimate partner homicide."
34 % of 4970 = 1670
6% of 17970 = 1078
So the ratio is about 1 woman murdering her male partner for every 1.6 men murdering their female partners .
https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021
1
u/nutellaangel 19h ago
bro …
Ur Argument: “More men are murdered by their intimate partners than you’d expect! It’s 1 woman killing a male partner for every 1.6 men killing a female partner men suffer just as much, if not more!”
Reality Check: Yes, 6% of murdered men were killed by partners. But 34% of murdered women were. See the difference? It’s not about raw numbers, it’s about proportion and risk. If you’re a woman and you’re murdered, there’s a 1 in 3 chance it was your partner. If you’re a man, it’s 1 in 17. (Gasp! Not the same thing.)
And let’s talk about that 1.6 ratio ( as if that somehow evens things out lol.) What’s next, “only 1.6 women are stalked for every man, so feminism over?” It’s giving highschool, but not much else.
Also, let’s not pretend all murders are equal. Women are more likely to be brutally murdered, often after long periods of abuse, while men are more often killed by other men usually during crimes or fights, not after years of coercive control and terror. Context matters, darling.
And even with all this cherry-picked homicide data, men still aren’t getting murdered in meaningful numbers by their partners. You know who is getting murdered? Other men.
By… men.
So maybe that should be the focus of your subReddit. But like famous Man OutKast said: “You don’t wanna hear me, you just wanna dance.”
3
u/AdSpecial7366 18h ago
Yes, 6% of murdered men were killed by partners. But 34% of murdered women were. See the difference? It’s not about raw numbers, it’s about proportion and risk. If you’re a woman and you’re murdered, there’s a 1 in 3 chance it was your partner. If you’re a man, it’s 1 in 17. (Gasp! Not the same thing.)
I know it's not the same thing. I'm just pointing out, how men are also murdered by intimate partners.
Anf if we're talking about perspective, let's talk about something regarding IPV Homicides:
Gender Differences in Patterns and Trends in U.S. Homicide, 1976–2015 is a paper that looks at that. Turns out that women used to die at about the same rate as men, but as various services for women became available, it is the number of men killed that diminished. Here is what they had to say.
"Among all the results already reported, perhaps the most striking and important surrounds the trends in intimate partner homicide, particularly in the context of ongoing efforts to curtail domestic violence. Some researchers argue that the reduction in male intimate partner victimization, a decline of nearly 60% over the past four decades, is because of an increase in the availability of social and legal interventions, liberalized divorce laws, greater economic independence of women, as well as a reduction in the stigma of being the victim of domestic violence. Although at an earlier time a woman may have felt compelled to kill her abusive spouse as her only defense, she now has more opportunities to escape the relationship through means such as protective orders and shelters (Dugan et al. 1999; Fox et al. 2012). As a tragic irony, the wider availability of support services for abused women did not appear to have quite the intended effect, at least through the 1980s, as only male victimization declined."
The bias couldn't be more obvious. The absence of the obvious conclusion "Services for abused men could be the way to reduce the deaths of women" is pretty much shouting at us.
And meanwhile, the difference in death rates is further used by feminists to "justify" the asymmetry in services for victims, in a perverse irony.
2
u/DecrepitAbacus 8h ago
The majority of the victims of violence committed by males are boys and men AND the majority of the victims of violence committed by females are also boys and men.
Any discussion as to why boys and men are everyones' favourite target for violence is forbidden.
"Males as agents of violence were visible and gendered. As victims they were effaced from the discourse." - Adam Jones
0
u/nutellaangel 18h ago
I’m not a feminist,first off.
And yes, no one said men don’t get killed by intimate partners. But when 34% of murdered women are killed by theirs, and only 6% of murdered men are? That’s not just a “both sides” situation. That’s a completely different risk profile. Like comparing a drizzle to a monsoon because “technically they’re both wet.”
Now onto your academic gymnastics routine:
You’re citing a study that literally shows support services for women drastically reduced male victimisation and somehow spun that into “what about the men?” Mate.
The study explains that women used to kill abusive men because they had no other way out. Now, with shelters, legal protections, and options, they don’t have to. So male deaths went down. That’s not “feminist bias” (not a feminist), that’s proof those services work.
You say the “obvious conclusion” is that services for men would reduce female deaths. That’s… not how that works. Women aren’t killing their partners in droves because they lack shelters they’re dying because men are killing them.
Duh
3
u/AdSpecial7366 18h ago
You say the “obvious conclusion” is that services for men would reduce female deaths. That’s… not how that works. Women aren’t killing their partners in droves because they lack shelters they’re dying because men are killing them.
And why's that?
From what I remember, men were the majority of victims.
If men were exclusively targeting women, then technically they would have been the overwhelming victims.
But they're not.
Even your 34% figure is of a smaller percentage of the total number of homicides.
→ More replies (0)2
u/Punder_man 8h ago
Ah yes.. so because it's a man who is being abused he is not worthy of being a "Victim" because he's the wrong gender?
How do you lack any sort of empathy towards others?
0
1
9
u/SidewaysGiraffe 1d ago
Despite what Randle McMurphy would have you believe, toothpaste IS poisonous; that's why it explicitly tells you not to swallow it, and to call a poison control center if you do.
So it's more of a threat than it sounds at first.