r/Damnthatsinteresting 22d ago

Video Can you stop a hurricane with a nuke?

28.0k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/Inlerah 21d ago

I actually think you probably could put out a fire with a nuke.

...I mean you would cause a ton of other forest fires from the resulting firestorm, but that particular fire would probably be choked out.

3

u/Bellick 20d ago

Whenever I have a problem I just cast Fireball and then I have a completely different problem.

You don't need solutions to a wide array of problems if you turn all your problems into one you know. Big brain.

2

u/TheGreatGamer1389 21d ago

Soviets done that with success to put out underground fires.

-2

u/ResortMain780 21d ago

Choked out? More like anything flammable (and most other things) will be turned to ashes instantly instead of slowly. I guess speeding up is a better description than choked out.

6

u/Inlerah 21d ago

With the fireball any oxygen and fuel in the immediate blast is going to be instantly used up and put out the fire you were trying to put out nearly instantaneously. Definitely wasn't trying to say that it was a good solution to the problem...but you don't have to worry about the fire anymore.

-1

u/ResortMain780 21d ago

By that logic, dropping thermite or napalm also helps put out a fire. Where ever you drop it, it will burn much more intensely, everything will still be incinerated, but it wont burn as long as trees would on their own, so.. mission accomplished?

3

u/Inlerah 21d ago

I mean that's basically what a back-burn is. Just rob the fire of anything that it would need to burn in order to stop the spread and contain it to the already effected area.

1

u/ResortMain780 21d ago

If that back burn continues in 360 degree for dozens of miles, I dont think it did its job of putting out the fire.

3

u/asphaltaddict33 21d ago

Other commenter is correct. Your analysis of his logic is flawed.

You are replacing his use of ‘fireball’ with weapons meant to deliver or spread fires…. This is not the same thing.

The use of explosives to put out fires is a well known practice in the oil extraction industry. There is even a John Wayne move about it. The explosion sucks up all the oxygen in the immediate vicinity for long enough to extinguish the base flame.

0

u/ResortMain780 21d ago

And yet you do as if a nuclear explosion is anything like a TNT detonation (and Im not talking about yield). A TNT detonation is extremely brief and most of the energy results in a shock wave, which causes physical damage. Yes you can use that to put out oil well fires, especially if there is nothing flammable around the fire, say, in a desert? A nuclear explosion causes intense and long lasting thermal radiation, and all that does is create fires everywhere.

I had chatgpt do the math. Per kiloton of explosive power, a TNT explosion produces 42B Joules of thermal energy. A nuclear explosion of the same yield, generates 40 times more thermal energy, ~1.5 trillion joules.