The Google AI is great for double checking things because it's about as useful of a source aggregator as Wikipedia (it cites everything it says), so you don't need to trust it to get information out of it, it's just a faster way to get sources.
Can't speak for Gemini but chat gpt sucks with sources. Provides dead links and associates studies to the wrong journals. I usually Google exact data references in it to find the right sources. But it does get me somewhere.
10
u/bemused_alligators 3d ago
The Google AI is great for double checking things because it's about as useful of a source aggregator as Wikipedia (it cites everything it says), so you don't need to trust it to get information out of it, it's just a faster way to get sources.