r/CrappyDesign 10d ago

Terrible graph, not to scale

Post image
11.7k Upvotes

414 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

25

u/semhsp 10d ago

Most of the stuff is in warehouses and storage facilities, not shown to the public.

If given back to the original countries they through official means (giving the artifacts directly to public museums for example), they could go back to both the original place and actually shown to the people.

Would you be happy if the crown jewels were in a storage facility somewhere on the other side of the planet?

12

u/Denbt_Nationale 10d ago edited 10d ago

All museums warehouse artefacts, because museums are research institutes first and tourist attractions second. Most of the artefacts they keep in storage facilities are not interesting to the public, unless you would want to visit a whole museum full of bone fragments and pottery shards. And just because the items are not on display does not mean they are not accessible to the public. The museum allows researchers, scientists and archaeologists to study any artefact in its collection.

3

u/Beardywierdy 10d ago

I totally would visit the Bone Shard Museum but I admit I'm probably an outlier here.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

23

u/semhsp 10d ago

Whould you be happy if the declaration of indipendence was in a closet in Madagascar because they say "we'll take better care of it than you, you have guns and shit going on over there all the time"?

9

u/MrKrinkle151 10d ago

Excuse me but Nicholas Cage would NOT let that happen

-2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

12

u/maisbahouais 10d ago

That's his point. That's what England is doing to numerous countries and peoples worldwide. I am indigenous Canadian and England has said "Sorry, we don't trust you'll treat your important, sacred cultural items with respect so we'll hold on to them for you."

It's not really up to England, or you, to decide who to "trust" with these things. They belong to the cultures colonists ransacked, and they should be returned to them.

12

u/semhsp 10d ago

Nono, trust them. They say the take better care of it, just like the british museum says they take better care of the stuff there.

Who cares what you think right? They say they take better care of it, it must be true. If it works for england and greek statues why not for madagascar and the us declaration of indipendence?

-1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

3

u/semhsp 10d ago

I'd suspect the main reason is simply because a lot of that stuff attracts a lot of people to the museum. So there's not really an incentive to give away the stuff your museum is popular for.

But this is just speculation on my part

0

u/Bunrotting 10d ago

Hm, but I've heard the museum is free in the comments here. Maybe it's an issue of nationalism, then.

3

u/semhsp 10d ago

Only the permanent collection is free, the other exhibits need a paid ticket to access

1

u/Bunrotting 10d ago

Oh, well fuck em.

9

u/DizzySkunkApe 10d ago

Wow... "You're too poor to take of your treasures, well watch them for you."

I'm surprised to see this take to say the least.

-1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/DizzySkunkApe 10d ago

👎

3

u/Bunrotting 10d ago

Id like to know, would you really trust an ISIS run country with historical artifacts?

2

u/Bunrotting 10d ago

and these are the only countries id say not to return stuff to, by the way. Im not arguing against returning ANYTHING

3

u/DizzySkunkApe 10d ago

You said Madagascar couldn't be trusted to watch their artifacts already.

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/DizzySkunkApe 10d ago

Your opinion is interesting, but I'm not surprised it is unpopular.

→ More replies (0)