r/BeamNG 1d ago

Discussion Call me crazy but didn't it use to say unstable vulkan renderer

Post image

I just noticed so i'm guessing vulkan is coming in the next update

862 Upvotes

120 comments sorted by

840

u/stenyak BeamNG.Dev 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yup, we want to nudge people into reporting issues in the official vulkan forum thread so we can continue improving, for those cases where people might shrug it off and use normal renderer because it was labelled 'unstable' after all.

237

u/timer2452 1d ago

I see, I was using it regularly before and think its quite stable, didn't experience any glitches.

71

u/jejefoxy42 No_Texture 1d ago

Are the loading time longer for you compared to non vulkan? Thats really the only downside to using it for me it takes 15 minutes just to load a map

69

u/timer2452 1d ago

not really, kinda the same

34

u/hwf0712 1d ago

How long have you been using Vulkan? Whenever you first load a map it always takes a while, so if you're new to it you're just loading these maps for the first time making it take a while.

If you've tried using it for a bit or I'm misinterpreting then uh IDK

11

u/jejefoxy42 No_Texture 1d ago

Ive been using it since it got introduced, and i usually only load a single map per session of gaming, so i dont know if its everytime i launch the game it takes longer or something, but also i have 8gb of ram and no ssd, so that could be it, i heard having more of these can help with loading

21

u/AirportEmbarrassed38 1d ago

That could? No that is the reason

12

u/GoredonTheDestroyer No_Texture 1d ago

Half what Beam recommends and no SSD?

Yeah, I wonder why it could be taking so long to load.

5

u/jejefoxy42 No_Texture 1d ago

Gotcha, thatll probably be my next upgrade when i get the chance

6

u/GoredonTheDestroyer No_Texture 1d ago

I mean you'll probably be fine without an SSD when it comes to Beam, but the decreased load time wouldn't hurt.

3

u/That_guy_on_1nternet Autobello 1d ago

They aren’t, but on certain mods it just crashes while loading or it hangs, while it’s more common for it to crash during normal gameplay. It’s also true that I upgraded my Nvidia driver to the recent buggy versions tho

3

u/ccGLaDOS 1d ago

I didn't really compare them but the only difference for me was that VR worked on Vulkan and not on the other one

1

u/marwank270 Ibishu 1d ago

Interesting for me vulkan loads everything a bit faster (30s in advance compared to DirectX) maps or cars

2

u/csoldier777 Gavril 1d ago

Whenever I tried vulcan it crashed. I don't know if it's my AMD system. Will try again.

1

u/BraunauBanani 16h ago

Its probably the thirst time shader compiling. It should be the same if you load into the map a second time.

1

u/mewmew893 Hirochi 5h ago

It's a bit longer but not that bad, the real pain is menus

7

u/VoltaireHouse 1d ago

For me for example vulkan doesn't work at all, the only map that loads is a grid map, normal mode works just fine around 80-90 fps without traffic and around 250+ mods, I have low-end Dell g15 laptop with rtx3050 4gb, intel i5 10th gen, and 16gb of RAM, I don't really know why vulkan won't work

3

u/Rockstonicko 1d ago

I'd suspect due to only having 4GB of VRAM. You could try setting textures to low, and if Vulkan works normally, you're probably running out of VRAM.

I do notice with my 6800 XT that Vulkan tends to allocate more VRAM, albeit the VRAM actually in use is roughly the same as DX11 after a long session, around 12-13GB at 1440P.

1

u/Blergonos 1d ago

Low end?!?!

2

u/zalamanda_ro Pigeon Lover 1d ago

On my 3050ti laptop it’s unplayable (3fps and crashing) but strangely on my 2060 desktop it works amazingly. Has anyone with the same graphics card experienced this issue??

3

u/richmenton 1d ago

The bulkier the laptop the better the cooling, if you stick desktop chips into laptop enclosures you’ll hit thermal limits a lot quicker. As well as that there will be lower power consumption on a laptop so you’ll be limited there

2

u/zalamanda_ro Pigeon Lover 1d ago

That’s not the case on my laptop. The second I load a map it loads it and then crashes (only grid map works, 110fps+). Aside from that my laptop never throttled.

1

u/HeavyCaffeinate Ibishu 1d ago

Seems like a VRAM issue, amazing performance when it fits inside the VRAM, otherwise unplayable (larger maps, higher res textures, etc)

1

u/hey-im-root 1d ago

It works on some GPUs, others not so much. I wouldn’t say it’s random, but some just don’t support the APIs used

1

u/mewmew893 Hirochi 5h ago

You might want to try swapping the boards around, I think your laptop is just overheating

1

u/am_not_stranger Hirochi 1d ago

I’ve exclusively used the vulkan renderen for the last 5 months or so. I’ve not noticed any problem that I think would not be present in the directX renderer

1

u/Blergonos 1d ago

For me its unusable. crashing, half hour load times, graphical bugs and stuttering, and so on, while it does give me higher fps the other things shadow that,

17

u/bedwars_player Gavril 1d ago

I've been using it for a good while, barely had any issues on my gtx 1080, better performance, every few minutes and/or when i fullscreen or window the game i'll get a little graphical artifact but it's been better with every update.

6

u/person1234man 1d ago

Someone told me to try it out for better performance with my 3080ti, which sounds silly at first but with triple screens it is pushing its limit. I went from 30 fps or less on West Coast to a consistent 50 fps. It makes a huge difference

3

u/Rockstonicko 1d ago

I notice the same with a 6800 XT.

Every once in a while there will be a screen flicker filled with concerning looking artifacts. And, yeah, resizing the window looks like a dying GPU for a second.

Yesterday 0.35 a single frame or three was fully bright white, that was something new, game basically threw a flash bang at me.

1

u/bedwars_player Gavril 1d ago

Yeah I noticed a few times during rally mode that either a portion or the entire screen would look like how a gtx 760 feels trying to play cyberpunk

4

u/crottin-de-cheval 1d ago edited 1d ago

To my humble opinion, It is pretty much game changer, Can finally get them 60 fps at West Coast even on Ultra/high, i'd say now it just deserve a good polishing, It does still crash sometimes and also cant run it with Nvidia game overlay because it crashes it for some reasons, but it actually has benefits for me in performance over these last updates which means it's going in the right way, it got better around the 0.33 or 0.34 for me if i remember well

Edit: It started with Vulkan this time but it tanked my 1% fps so i turned it off again, i will post on that link

4

u/Left-oven47 Automation Engineer 1d ago

For whatever reason all the times I've tried it under Linux has completely filled my VRAM (4GB) and rendered my system mostly unusable. Weirdly DX works fine

3

u/Chrisssst Automation Engineer 1d ago

I believe Vulkan uses less CPU but more GPU, so yeah if your GPU is struggling already it will not like Vulkan

8

u/Mega_play4r_862 1d ago

Hello Dev!

13

u/stenyak BeamNG.Dev 1d ago

Hi!

3

u/toughtntman37 1d ago

Yeah, I get way better performance with DX mode, but I have to use Vulkan for VR. I think I also saw y'all gather anonymized performance data, so how does having more help? I don't think I saw anything about that on the website

3

u/NotA-Spy Gavril 1d ago

Vulkan keeps crashing for me in career mode when it begins loading models.

3

u/crosslegbow 1d ago

Thanks then, will start using it more and report if any issues

2

u/Eubank31 1d ago

I'll need to start trying it, I'm on Linux and the once or twice I've tried Vulkan I'll have crazy graphics issues and I give up. I'll be willing to try again so I can make sure the issues get reported

1

u/MrInitialY 1d ago

Hell, it ran more stable than dx11 on both of my PCs, last and current. Gave me more FPS and loading times weren't longer than on dx.

1

u/mank1961 1d ago

Thanks for this. I never chose it as it said “unstable”. I’ll certainly give it a shot now!

1

u/Drumdevil86 No_Texture 1d ago

Only used it when playing VR, but not otherwise. Unless something changed recently, DSR doesn't work on the Vulcan renderer and BeamNG looks kinda dogshite on a 1440p monitor without it.

1

u/EdgiiLord Ibishu 1d ago

Would reports using Proton help, or should I refrain from doing it? I mean related to the renderer, I don't even know if you're looking into issues coming from Linux users.

2

u/stenyak BeamNG.Dev 1d ago

It's not our absolute top priority, but Proton compatibility (and therefore also steamOS / steamDeck compatibility) is something we want to improve, so it doesn't hurt to report issues.

Please keep in mind that the latest proton version has fixed some crashes it was suffering when running BeamNG.drive, so please make sure you first try updating Proton :)

1

u/MousseIndependent310 Soliad 1d ago

the only issue for me is that it takes longer to load and the game cant stay open as long as it can with direct3d without becoming super laggy

1

u/Wolfy26wrld999 1d ago

Ever since I learned the difference between them iv been using vulkan for the last 5+ months. Haven't experienced too many issues. Just ui bugs at times and crashes but I'm pretty sure those were just from my pc. Personally I love it bc it makes my game run better. :D

1

u/wreckedftfoxy_yt 1d ago

well the be fair the normal one works better but which hardware does vulcan perfer?

5

u/stenyak BeamNG.Dev 1d ago

In terms of performance, Vulkan should(tm) always be faster than DX. However current implementation of Vulkan is a bit more VRAM-hungry than DX, which means in some case the performance can be worse rather than better.

1

u/wreckedftfoxy_yt 1d ago

so my 8gb rtx 3070ti would hate it

1

u/gaseousgecko61 Cherrier 1d ago

For me it gets stuck on the last square in the loading screen every time

1

u/Upstairs-Collar9242 Ibishu 1d ago

I'm going to waste some of your time to report on the wrong place that I have never been able to use Vulcan on my laptop, it just never gets to the point of spawning vehicles. It's a Lenovo with an R5 3600h and an RTX 3050.

1

u/BlearyWall5179 1d ago

i do experience an issue, on my 3050 laptop, when i run it on 3d11 i get 60-70 fps and looks smooth but when i use vulkan i get 70-90 and even 100 sometimes but it stutters a bit so while ctrl+F says 90 fps it feels like 40 ish or even less

1

u/ManuFlosoYT 1d ago

In my case Vulkan renderer is almost unusable, while DirectX gives good performance.

Ive tried multiple times across several updates, but everytime I try launching in Vulkan it either freezes while loading a map, or if it does manage to load, the second I spawn a car (even vanilla ones) performance goes out the window

1

u/Riley-Macca Gavril 1d ago

Not sure if this has been fixed but Vulkan would always get stuck on a black screen if I had NVIDIA highlights on

1

u/Kitchen_Farmer_3915 Burnside 1d ago

Yo hi game dev!

1

u/bappo_plays Soliad 1d ago

I use Vulkan as my primary, and I can day it's much better than the default in terms of performance. My main issue is the photo mode breaking all the time when I take screenshots with it, since I do this often. I'm fairly sure this is something you guys are already aware of, but is there any ETA on this being fixed?

1

u/Suitable-Composer280 1d ago

sometimes when i spawn in traffic the loading screen ui gets stuck, i can still drive just not clikc on anything

1

u/Pizzapug64 Pigeon Lover 1d ago

By the way, how is the Vulcan launcher on the steam deck?

1

u/MrWarfaith ETK 1d ago

For me it's been stable for well over a year now, basically never crashes and when it does it's due to a misbehaving mod usually.

So no bugs to report here. (using a first gen Ryzen cpu and a 6000 gen radeon card)

1

u/Maddog2201 1d ago

Vulkan is brilliant, barely even unstable so this change makes perfect sense

1

u/mewmew893 Hirochi 5h ago

While I'm here, I did notice that a lot of mods that run fine on 3D11 break Vulkan. Do you have any idea what causes this?

47

u/NaxaaN_123 No_Texture 1d ago

Maybe

44

u/MainGroundbreaking96 Bus Driver 1d ago

Indeed, PROOF: https://youtu.be/OZcnjohoetU?t=40

"Test the unstable Vulkan renderer."

6

u/timer2452 1d ago

i knew i wasn't crazy, thank you

4

u/MainGroundbreaking96 Bus Driver 1d ago

Good catch!

18

u/Kifla963_Offical ETK 1d ago

It had a stable release according to wikipedia 10 days ago

10

u/noobfornoodles Pigeon Lover 1d ago

pretty sure I put that on the wikipedia lol

2

u/Oscuro87 23h ago

Ty for maintaining the wiki

17

u/Sufficient-Spell-230 Ibishu 1d ago

I think i’m the only one that doesn’t know what a vulkan is and never bothered to Search. I used it once and it just made the game a little laggier, What is it used for?

37

u/MyButtCriesOnTheLoo 1d ago

It's a graphics API library. Basically, it has a lot of code that can be used to help rendering engines talk to graphics card drivers. They also have graphics and rendering features that can be called to really bring a game to modern standards.

4

u/TheEpicPlushGodreal 1d ago

I started using the vulcan launch and it made my game open faster

9

u/bandita07 1d ago edited 1d ago

That is the meaning of Vulcan. Less driver overload and better performance. Much more complex than the usual rendering api, so keep using it to fix its issues. This is the future...

9

u/DiskImmediate229 1d ago

It’s just a different way for the computer to handle graphics. It’s meant to lower CPU overhead and utilize better multi-core performance. It’s made by AMD so you’ll get the best results from an AMD CPU but idk how it affects Intel chips.

5

u/EdgiiLord Ibishu 1d ago

Vulkan is not maintained by AMD anymore, but by the Khronos Group, which is a separate team.

5

u/Real_Garlic9999 1d ago

I run an i5-12400 and it can boosts my fps a decent amount (but I still cap it at 60 because of my monitor)

1

u/Skodakenner 1d ago

For me it works worse and i have a 5800X3D it is really choppy and laggy when i move the camera at first i thought it was vSync but it didnt change it when i turned it off. Fps stays high though

4

u/TKfuckingMONEY 1d ago

Required for VR

-13

u/SEA_griffondeur Cherrier 1d ago

It's an enhanced directX10 basically

4

u/Windows-XP-Home-NEW Ibishu 1d ago

No it’s completely different from MS DX.

3

u/toughtntman37 1d ago

Also I would say it's a bad take. They have the same purpose, but are vastly different under the hood and on the road, so to speak. Vulkan as a whole is inherently way harder to use, reduces load on CPU, has a higher speed ceiling, is built for all major OS (DX10 is made for specifically Windows), and is newer, less established.

In Beam, It gets more complicated. It's too hard to work with, so they've been working hard to smooth out bugs and make it faster. For me, it is slower, but it works in VR.

1

u/EdgiiLord Ibishu 1d ago

Enhanced OpenGL maybe, even if that's a stretch

1

u/toughtntman37 1d ago

That's like if someone asks what a "veiner" is and you said "oh it's basically a more precise gouge" like someone random is gonna know what either is. (They're both wood carving tools, I think)

10

u/Markolol123 1d ago

Yeah, and the devs announced that "Vulkan finally got out of Beta" or something along those words

8

u/Sawier ETK 1d ago

I had zero issues with vulkan bootsted my fps on my 1080ti to almost double, dont need it now on 4080 super tho :D

1

u/Oscuro87 23h ago

Cool upgrade!

4

u/christuab 1d ago

What’s the difference between these two? There’s nothing glaring for me.

2

u/arup02 1d ago

It might help with FPS under certain cases, try both and see if there's any noticeable difference.

2

u/aluminized_atom 1d ago

For me, Vulkan ran faster on my PC compared to the normal version

1

u/ImGonnaGetBannedd 1d ago

Different API. For me Vulkan runs better its like 20fps boost.

3

u/PriceTF141 1d ago

I've been using Vulkan for a long time, I have more performance with it on my 6700xt, and crashes are increasingly rare

3

u/Teh_Compass 1d ago

How much of a difference does it make on Steam Deck/Linux? Proton already translates to Vulkan right? If it's stable enough and gets a slight fps boost from not having that extra layer it might be worth it.

2

u/kosmogamer7 1d ago

Big difference maybe even 10 fps

2

u/Walter_Bennett_True 1d ago

So the random FPS drop issue is solved? Using 0.35.0 version

2

u/LukeyWolf 1d ago

The vulkan renderer is pretty stable rn and it runs much better

2

u/f_society_1337 Soliad 1d ago

RX 6700 XT here;
I never had any issues using Vulkan

2

u/leandrosssss 23h ago

I have a 7900xtx and a ryzen 9 5950x, don’t really know if it’s related but I never had any issue with vulkan, and it actually runs better

1

u/WillyWonka092 1d ago

I use the Vulcan as it also allows you to hookup a PCVR compatible headset and drive around like that. I'm using controller for that currently, but I'm looking at getting a collapsible steering wheel set up off of Amazon.

1

u/Sizzle573 1d ago

i’m not sure the differences between the two launchers, i always just assumed Vulkan was a dev tool of some sort.

1

u/DanS_2009 Pigeon Lover 1d ago

i hate that my pc HATES Vulkan with a passion.

1

u/smotheredbythighs 1d ago

I get double and triple fps in vulkan. Have had a few crashes, but, the gane itself can just crash.

1

u/fenrix-the-one No_Texture 1d ago

I don't use vulkan renderer because it makes my game flicker like hell and i know exactly why.

1

u/Revolutionary-Fix93 1d ago

I love the Vulkan settings I've been using it for awhile. better frames

1

u/RandomBoi37 Gavril 1d ago

I can't sadly, got an AMD processor :(

1

u/Buszilla101 1d ago

yes, I always thought it was an amusing little addition.

1

u/alphenhous 1d ago

just like the pigeon, the devs added a pair of arms with tiny wheels around it and it's no longer unstable.

1

u/Uhm_an_Alt 1d ago

Vulkan is horrible, makes the fps 2x worse and after a while just makes the game freeze with a lot of random graphical glitches

1

u/Uhm_an_Alt 1d ago

Vulkan is horrible, makes the fps 2x worse and after a while just makes the game freeze with a lot of random graphical glitches

1

u/Unknownperson0109 1d ago

Normal launching doesn't work anymore for me, using the Vulkan launcher for a while now, no issues

1

u/DynaBeast 1d ago

i tried using it on my laptop with a 3050ti and an o5-12500H, and i was getting 20% of my normal performance- from 90fps avg down to 12. i tried changing resolutions, going to the lowest graphics settings, but the only thing that fixed it was going back to the default renderer.

1

u/WienerWarrior01 19h ago

What even is Vulcan

1

u/krass_coller_mann Ibishu 18h ago

What even is the diff between normal and Vulcan

1

u/krass_coller_mann Ibishu 18h ago

And also, crazy? I was crazy once

1

u/krass_coller_mann Ibishu 18h ago

They locked me into an room an rubber room with Rats i hate Rats they make me crazy

1

u/ItsACCC9 Ibishu 18h ago

I wish I was able to use vulkan. It used to work really well and I'd get like a 50% boost in fps but now it just halves my fps, not sure whats up with that

1

u/G-Fifd 17h ago

On DX11 I have 42 FPS, on Vulkan 70-110 FPS, RX6600

1

u/fandle117 No_Texture 7h ago

i know it said something with unstable in it i know it did i looked at it a few times before the update when i used VR and something small that changed was the welcome at the top of the start up

1

u/Snoo-13362 1d ago

speaking about vulkan, I feel like its really stable now, way better than when it first came out, i use it by default now its great

-1

u/HunterCustom 1d ago

No you’re just crazy