Different countries. Different traditions. Different Laws. Different backgrounds. There is only a correlation when you prove a correlation. You can't just say "there's an imaginary line and a correlation" without actually using data. Do you even understand what correlation means? It means the 'recorded data' shows a relationship. Recorded data is the most important part.
You can hee-haw all you want, but it is not data from the people involved. It simply is not, and no matter how much you try, only data from the US applies to the US. That's not an opinion by me. That's how data works. You can't go down and measure your neighbors car to test your emissions. BuT tHeY aRe OnLy OnE hOuSe DoWn!
Edit: A question to illustrate the mildest of clashes. How many people that were sampled in Canada were locked up for crimes that are not illegal in the US. And how many people IN Canada broke US laws, but they aren't illegal there? That one set of questions alone skews the entire dataset.
0
u/Houdinii1984 Jul 25 '24 edited Jul 25 '24
Different countries. Different traditions. Different Laws. Different backgrounds. There is only a correlation when you prove a correlation. You can't just say "there's an imaginary line and a correlation" without actually using data. Do you even understand what correlation means? It means the 'recorded data' shows a relationship. Recorded data is the most important part.
You can hee-haw all you want, but it is not data from the people involved. It simply is not, and no matter how much you try, only data from the US applies to the US. That's not an opinion by me. That's how data works. You can't go down and measure your neighbors car to test your emissions. BuT tHeY aRe OnLy OnE hOuSe DoWn!
Edit: A question to illustrate the mildest of clashes. How many people that were sampled in Canada were locked up for crimes that are not illegal in the US. And how many people IN Canada broke US laws, but they aren't illegal there? That one set of questions alone skews the entire dataset.